Search

AbstractPurposeMaterials/MethodsResultsConclusion\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis study provides an understanding of the chronic low back pain (CLBP) beliefs and management practices of physicians/doctors and physiotherapists in Ghana, and the mechanisms underlying their beliefs and practices.Thirty-three individual semi-structured interviews, involving eighteen physio­therapists and fifteen physicians involved with CLBP management, were carried out. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using Straussian grounded theory principles and critical realist philosophy.Five categories were derived: The predominance of bio-medical/mechanical beliefs, maladaptive beliefs, maladaptive practices, limited involvement of physiotherapists and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) and evidence-based beliefs and practices. The predominant mechanisms underlying the HCPs beliefs and practices were: the healthcare environment (professional roles/identity hinged around paternalistic and biomedical care, fragmented CLBP management, limited physiotherapy/HCPs’ knowledge) and sociocultural environment (sociocultural/patients’ expectations of passive therapy and paternalism).The CLBP beliefs and practices of HCPs involved with CLBP in Ghana is modelled around a professional identity that is largely hinged on paternalism and bio-medical/mechanical understandings. Lack of collaboration and sociocultural expectations also play a significant role. There is the need for a reconstitution of Ghanaian HCPs’ CLBP beliefs and management approaches to align with evidenced-based approaches (e.g., imaging should not be universally prescribed, biopsychosocial and patient-centred care).The burden of low back pain is substantial globally, with an increasing burden identified in low-to-middle income countries.This study highlights a predominance of non-evidence-based understandings around chronic low back pain and its management among Ghanaian healthcare professionals, although some evidence-based approaches were also identified.Ghanaian healthcare professionals need to engage with current evidence for chronic low back pain management, incorporate psychological factors and consider non-specific chronic low back pain as a possible diagnostic label.Professional, structural, and sociocultural inclinations towards paternalism, passive therapies, biomedical and fragmented approaches to chronic low back pain management need to be addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Organizational reform has been commonplace in the response to global socio-economic changes. Rising managerialism, consumerism and marketization has accelerated reforms; providing challenges for the healthcare professions. The latest socio-economic challenge, austerity, and its professional implications have scarcely been researched. This study aims to explore the lived reality of austerity as experienced by physiotherapists working on the frontline of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Nottingham; the study was advertised via the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy online network. Two participants took part; semi-structured interviews were completed, audio recorded, and transcribed. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes arose from the data: (1) Fulfilling professional responsibilities; (2) Changing organizational landscape; and (3) Professional reality of rationalizing and accommodating austerity. The clinical implications of austerity included increased length of hospital stay, insufficient community services, constrained resources, and understaffing. Participants demonstrated attempts to preserve their professional status and services through restratification throughout the intra-professional hierarchy, changing division of labor, and re-professionalization. Despite claims that austerity is coming to an end, it remained a reality for these clinicians in the NHS. Physiotherapists in this study used similar methods to preserve practice when faced with exogenous constraints as seen in medicine, such as re-professionalization and restratification. However, this attempt to defend professionalism by a non-medical healthcare profession was met with both successes and losses and has implications for the wider healthcare profession ecology, identifying an area for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder affecting populations from both low- and middle-income, and high-income countries. Global prevalence of LBP is estimated at 9.4% with prevalence rates substantially higher in low- and middle-income countries notably in Africa (39%). The recommended biopsychosocial model of managing patients with LBP, has been predominantly applied and evaluated in high-income countries, therefore, it is essential to ascertain the feasibility of implementing this approach in low- and middle-income countries including Ghana. To investigate the feasibility of implementing a biopsychosocial physiotherapy management approach (exercise and patient education) for the management of patients with chronic LBP in Ghana. Context: Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Mixed-methods, sequential, feasibility, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study. Physiotherapists will be recruited and trained to deliver the biopsychosocial intervention, followed by recruitment of patients with CLBP. Assessment of outcome measures will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-months, focusing on feasibility outcomes including recruitment rate, retention rate, and acceptability of the intervention. Patient demographics and secondary outcomes measures will also be collected. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the outcomes data and assess feasibility against a priori feasibility criteria. Finally, qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore participants' experiences and acceptance through thematic analysis. This study will investigate the feasibility of implementing a biopsychosocial physiotherapy management approach for patients with CLBP in Ghana. The outcomes will assess the feasibility of the intervention, the appropriateness of outcome measures and inform a future clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMaterial and methodsResultsConclusion\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLow back pain management has evolved with researchers advocating for a biopsychosocial management model. The biopsychosocial management model has been predominantly applied in high-income countries and underexplored in low- and middle-income countries including Ghana. This study aimed to explore the potential barriers and facilitators to patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and physiotherapists engagement with a biopsychosocial intervention (exercise and patient education) as part of a feasibility study.This was a qualitative study embedded within a mixed-methods, sequential, feasibility study, in Ghana, applying semi-structured interviews. Two categories of participants involved in this study were, two trained physiotherapists, and six patients with CLBP, sampled within the feasibility study.Regarding the barriers and facilitators to the delivery of the BPS intervention, five interlinked themes emerged from the thematic analysis. These were: structure and process of delivery; patients’ expectations; patients’ health beliefs, autonomy, and engagement; external influences and personal and professional characteristics of physiotherapists.The themes that emerged from this study demonstrated many positive facilitators based on participants’ improved understanding of LBP and the clarity and purpose of the biopsychosocial intervention. The results therefore demonstrate a potential to deliver the biopsychosocial intervention in a Ghanaian context.A biopsychosocial approach to managing chronic low back pain offers a promising alternative to patients and physiotherapists in Ghana.A biopsychosocial approach to managing chronic low back pain has the potential to improve physiotherapists’ thoughts and attitudes, and have a positive influence on their professional development in Ghana.A biopsychosocial approach to managing chronic low back pain has the potential to reverse patients’ maladaptive beliefs, improve their understanding of their condition, improve outcomes in Ghana. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives There is an emergent body of evidence supporting exercise therapy and physical activity in the management of musculoskeletal pain. The purpose of this study was to explore potential barriers and facilitators with patients and physiotherapists with patellofemoral pain involved in a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) study. The trial investigated a loaded self-managed exercise intervention, which included education and advice on physical activity versus usual physiotherapy as the control. Design Qualitative study, embedded within a mixedmethods design, using semi-structured interviews. Setting A UK National Health Service physiotherapy clinic in a large teaching hospital. Participants Purposively sampled 20 participants within a feasibility RCT study; 10 patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain, aged between 18 and 40 years, and 10 physiotherapists delivering the interventions. Results In respect to barriers and facilitators, the five overlapping themes that emerged from the data were: (1) locus of control; (2) belief and attitude to pain; (3) treatment expectations and preference; (4) participants' engagement with the loaded self-managed exercises and (5) physiotherapists' clinical development. Locus of control was one overarching theme that was evident throughout. Contrary to popular concerns relating to painful exercises, all participants in the intervention group reported positive engagement. Both physiotherapists and patients, in the intervention group, viewed the single exercise approach in a positive manner. Participants within the intervention group described narratives demonstrating self-efficacy, with greater internal locus of control compared with those who received usual physiotherapy, particularly in relation to physical activity. Conclusions Implementation, delivery and evaluation of the intervention in clinical settings may be challenging, but feasible with the appropriate training for physiotherapists. Participants' improvements in pain and function may have been mediated, in some part, by greater self-efficacy and locus of control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundPrimary care faces unprecedented challenges. A move towards a more comprehensive, multi-disciplinary service delivery model has been proposed as a means with which to secure more sustainable services for the future. One seemingly promising response has been the implementation of physiotherapy self-referral schemes, however there is a significant gap in the literature regarding implementation.AimThis evaluation aimed to explore how the professionals and practice staff involved in the delivery of an in-practice physiotherapy self-referral scheme understood the service, with a focus on perceptions of value, barriers and impact.Design and settingA qualitative evaluation was conducted across two UK city centre practices that had elected to participate in a pilot self-referral scheme offering ‘physiotherapy-as-a-first-point-of-contact’ for patients presenting with a musculoskeletal complaint.MethodsIndividual and focus group interviews were conducted amongst participating physiotherapists, administration/reception staff, general practitioners (GPs) and one practice nurse (in their capacity as practice partner). Interview data were collected from a total of 14 individuals. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThree key themes were highlighted by this evaluation. First, the imperative of effecting a cultural change – including management of patient expectation with particular reference to the belief that GPs represented the ‘legitimate choice’, re-visioning contemporary primary care as a genuine team approach, and the physiotherapists’ reconceptualisation of their role and practices. Second, the impact of the service on working practice across all stakeholders – specifically re-distribution of work to ‘unburden’ the GP, and the critical role of administration staff. Finally, beliefs regarding the nature and benefits of physiotherapeutic musculoskeletal expertise – fears regarding physiotherapists’ ability to work autonomously or identify ‘red flags’ were unfounded.ConclusionThis qualitative evaluation draws on the themes to propose five key lessons which may be significant in predicting the success of implementing physiotherapy self-referral schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]