Search

Highlights: What are the main findings? This multicenter retrospective study, encompassing two hospital sites for training and leveraging data from forty-seven different hospitals for testing, aimed to develop machine learning models utilising both clinical and radiomics features (individually and in combination) extracted from pre-treatment CT scans. The objective was to predict PFS and OS in patients with PDAC. Among the various models developed, the model based on the combination of clinical and CT-derived tumour radiomics features demonstrated superior performance for OS with a C-index of 0.72 in the testing dataset. Conversely, the model based solely on clinical features excelled in predicting PFS, achieving a C-index of 0.70 in the testing dataset. What is the implication of the main finding? The analysis further highlighted the high relevance of clinical features both for OS and PFS outcomes in patients with PDAC. Purpose. This multicenter retrospective study aims to identify reliable clinical and radiomic features to build machine learning models that predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Methods. Between 2010 and 2020 pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT scans of 287 pathology-confirmed PDAC patients from two sites of the Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB) and from 47 hospitals within the HUB network were retrospectively analysed. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were also collected. Gross tumour volume (GTV) and non-tumoral pancreas (RPV) were semi-manually segmented and radiomics features were extracted. Patients from two HUB sites comprised the training dataset, while those from the remaining 47 hospitals of the HUB network constituted the testing dataset. A three-step method was used for feature selection. Based on the GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis classifier, different machine learning models were trained and tested to predict OS and PFS. Model performances, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Highlights: What are the main findings? Both the model utilizing edema-related features and the model utilizing mass-related features demonstrated promising results in predicting the occurrence of lung metastases, with similar performances. What is the implication of the main finding? The findings suggest that the analysis of radiomic features extracted exclusively from edema can offer valuable insights into the prediction of lung metastases. Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate whether radiomic features extracted solely from the edema of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) could predict the occurrence of lung metastasis in comparison with features extracted solely from the tumoral mass. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 32 STSs, including 14 with lung metastasis and 18 without. A segmentation of the tumor mass and edema was assessed for each MRI examination. A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted for each mass segmentation and 107 radiomic features for each edema segmentation. A two-step feature selection process was applied. Two predictive features for the development of lung metastasis were selected from the mass-related features, as well as two predictive features from the edema-related features. Two Random Forest models were created based on these selected features; 100 random subsampling runs were performed. Key performance metrics, including accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC), were calculated, and the resulting accuracies were compared. Results: The model based on mass-related features achieved a median accuracy of 0.83 and a median AUC of 0.88, while the model based on edema-related features achieved a median accuracy of 0.75 and a median AUC of 0.79. A statistical analysis comparing the accuracies of the two models revealed no significant difference. Conclusion: Both models showed promise in predicting the occurrence of lung metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas. These findings suggest t, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

info:eu-repo/semantics/published