Search

Contains fulltext : 215417.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), This study compares the quality of life (QoL) of infantile hemangioma (IH) patients and their parents at the beginning of the involution phase with QoL in the growth phase. Additionally, the differences in QoL between propranolol-treated patients and non-treated patients are assessed. Overall, QoL seems to improve, even before involution occurs. Due to the efficacy of propranolol treatment, the impact on QoL remains relatively mild even in patients with severe IH.

Radboud University, 09 oktober 2018, Promotores : Kerkhof, P.C.M. van de, Schultze Kool, L.J. Co-promotores : Vleuten, C.J.M. van der, Spillekom-van Koulil, S., Contains fulltext : 195512.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) data are lacking in children with infantile hemangioma (IH) and their parents/caregivers. Available data are conflicting. OBJECTIVES: To determine QoL of (parents of) patients with IH in the proliferative phase related to IH-severity and activity. METHODS: Parents of 59 IH-patients (

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: The Hemangioma Severity Scale (HSS) assesses the severity of an infantile hemangioma (IH). OBJECTIVE: First, to compare HSS scores between patients with IH for whom propranolol treatment was indicated at their first visit and those who were not treated. Second, to assess suitable cutoff values for the need for propranolol treatment. METHOD: All patients with IH who attended our tertiary referral center since 2008 and were 0 to 6 months of age at their first visit were included. They were divided into propranolol and no-propranolol groups on the basis of choice of treatment at their first visit. HSS scores were assessed, and median scores were compared. RESULTS: A total of 657 children (342 in the propranolol group) were included. The median HSS score (25th-75th percentile) in the propranolol group was 10 (range, 8-14) compared with 7 (range, 4-9) in the no-propranolol group (P < .001). Cutoff values of 6 or lower (no indication for treatment) and 11 or higher (indication for treatment) resulted in 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity, respectively. LIMITATIONS: HSS scoring was not completely blinded. CONCLUSION: The HSS with cutoff values of 6 or lower and 11 or higher could be used as a triage tool for propranolol treatment. Patient age, IH type, and parental preference may also contribute to treatment decisions.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the potential long-term effects of propranolol treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH). OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess psychologic (social, emotional, behavioral, and executive) functioning in children treated with propranolol for IH. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with IH (6.1-7.6 years of age) treated with propranolol for >/=6 months during infancy, and without other developmental risk factors, were recruited. Parents completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Social Emotional Questionnaire, Child Behavior Checklist, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. For each questionnaire, the number of patients with abnormal scores, based on established cutoff points, was calculated. RESULTS: Only 1 child (3.7%) scored outside the normal range. The Hemangioma Severity Scale did not correlate with psychologic problems in these patients. Longer treatment duration was found to correlate with less attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) characteristics (rho = -0.476; P = .012) and better executive functioning (rho = -0.466; P = .014). LIMITATIONS: Exclusion of children born at gestational age <36 weeks or small for gestational age, no reference group and relatively small study size. CONCLUSION: We found no increased risk for psychologic problems at age 7 in IH patients treated with propranolol.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Long-term adverse effects of propranolol treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH) in young children have been suggested. OBJECTIVE: To compare growth and development in children treated with propranolol for IH with nontreated healthy controls. METHODS: Eighty two (73%) children with IH aged 43 to 51 months treated with propranolol for 6 months or longer, and without other developmental risk factors, were recruited (cases) and matched with 4 twin counterparts and 78 children from a community-based cohort (control subjects). Parents completed the 48-months Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Percentages of children with abnormal ASQ results were compared using chi(2) analyses. Mean ASQ scores and growth were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Six (7.3%) cases had abnormal ASQ results, compared with 10 (12.2%) controls (P = .292). Mean ASQ total score (25th-75th percentile) was 52.9 (50.8-57.0) for cases and 51.9 (49.0-56.0) for controls (P = .383). Height and weight of cases and controls were comparable. LIMITATIONS: A parent-completed screening instrument was used. The exclusion of children born at gestational age less than 36 weeks and/or children born small for gestational age partly limits generalizability. CONCLUSION: We found no increased developmental risk or growth impairment at age 4 years in patients with IH treated with propranolol.

Contains fulltext : 171287.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext