Search

The article discusses the China-Philippines dispute over the South China Sea and its implications for the region's stability, highlighting the escalating tensions fueled by China's assertive actions and rejection of international court rulings. Topics include the strategic importance of the South China Sea, competing territorial claims, and the role of the U.S. in maintaining maritime order and freedom of navigation.

In view of the changing security environment in Northeast Asia, stemming from China's assertiveness in regional issues and North Korea's nuclear weapons program, the threat perception in Japan has considerably heightened. This has triggered a debate domestically in Japan about whether it is an appropriate time to review its nuclear option as a means of deterrence. Such thinking presupposes that confidence in the U.S. extended deterrence has started eroding or has weakened. There are various political strands to this issue and there is no consensus yet reached to make the change officially possible. If Japan does indeed initiate a change in policy seriously, it would make the United States uncomfortable. But given the strong anti-nuclear sentiment in Japan, it would be difficult for any government of any party to sell the idea to the people. The domino effect of such a policy change would be seen almost immediately in South Korea and Taiwan, making Northeast Asia the world's most nuclearized region. This would also mean the abrogation of the security alliance relationship with the United States. Given Japan's capability in terms of capital, technology and possession of sufficient spent fuel needed for making the nuclear bomb it would be possible for Japan to make a nuclear bomb, but it would be a politically dangerous move and therefore inadvisable. Though it would remain theoretically possible, the debate would remain as an academic exercise for quite some time. This essay makes an attempt to study this complex issue as objectively as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sino-Japanese relationship is too complex a narrative in the study of security and strategic dynamics of East Asia. Despite historical irritants both have developed such a close economic relationship that neither can afford to derail the partnership by any act of miscalculation. Though neither perceives the relationship in zero-sum-game terms, both realize the benefits that would accrue if it is deepened, nothwithstanding the element of fragility in the relationship. More recently, China’s military modernisation and rising assertiveness in territorial issues have raised anxiety in Japan. Similarly, China does not see kindly to Japan’s Defense Guidelines that mentions China as a matter of ‘concern’. The contending claims over the Senkaku Islands are a sore point in the relationship and a solution does not seem to be in the horizon. This article attempts to analyse the intricacies in the bilateral relationship in the context of changing security dynamics in the Asia Pacific region and in the wake of economic interdependence and the desire to foster economic integration of economies. China is a big challenge for Japan. Managing China through regional institutions such as East Asia summit and ADMM Plus are the desirable options. The extended presence of the US as a stabilising force is likely to stay despite talks of US ‘decline’. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Remittances are increasingly identified as golden eggs that contribute crucially to the foreign exchange earnings of many developing countries across the world. Governments and international agencies have recognised that remittances to the developing world are substantially greater than aid. Though the global flow of such remittances is in the vicinity of $1 50-200 billion, remittances to South Asia alone total perhaps $40-50 billion. Much of these remittances are done through unofficial mechanisms and procedures, via informal value transfer systems and are, therefore, unregulated and uncontrolled. Proliferating migrant social networks and the emergence of a vibrant immigration industry, have given a momentum to international migration. Remittances generate both micro and macro-economic effects. In microeconomic terms, remittances make an important welfare contribution to the receiving household, besides providing a cushion during an economic downturn or following natural disasters. They also generate ripple effects impacting extended family and community beyond the receiving household due to increased consumption. In macroeconomic terms, remittances provide a stable flow of funds that is often counter-cyclical and an important source of foreign exchange for many countries. The argument in this article concentrates on the economic and financial linkages that the Indian diasporic community has maintained with the mother country and their relevance to the developmental programmes in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the role of India pertaining to the goal to established an East Asian community. India's interest in the East Asian community had sparked a challenges since it is not an East Asian countries. The country's involvement in the East Asia will greatly affect political and economic activity in the region. Its inclusion in the integration process is important as major key players in enhancing regional cooperation.