Search

The ideology of the contemporary far-right movement inWestern Europe is characterised by a belief in authoritarianism, nativism and a rejection of liberal or democratic principles. How are these ideological characteristics reflected in the movement's approach to education? This article argues that education can be politicised from either a redistributive or cultural perspective. Drawing on literature and archival sources, it shows that right-wing parties and intellectuals have developed clear preferences for education as a cultural policy, but are more ambivalent when it comes to the distributive dimension of education. The fact that this overall pattern and its variations across the movement can be interpreted using existing theoretical approaches from education policy and history confirms the value of these approaches for future research on far-right approaches to education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Sozialreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Die Beteiligung an den Wahlen nimmt ab, die Aversion gegen die Parteien zu. Andererseits sind die Wahlen das Grundinstrument einer repräsentativen Demokratie, mit der die Bürgerinnen und Bürger ihre Vertreter selbst bestimmen können. Sinnvolle Alternativen dazu gibt es kaum. Um das Verhältnis zwischen den Wählern und den Gewählten zu verbessern und die Demokratie zu beleben, genügt es nicht, an den Wahlsystemen anzusetzen. Aber auch sie können einen Beitrag liefern. Diese Abhandlung nimmt sich vor, die Grundmodelle, das Proporzsystem einerseits und das Majorzsystem andererseits, und ihre Kombinationen auf ihre Auswirkungen hin zu analysieren und nach den optimalen Formen zu suchen. Natürlich kann man kein Idealmodell über alle Länder stülpen. Unterschiedliche sozioökonomische und kulturelle Rahmenbedingungen sind zu beachten. Das darf aber nicht daran hindern, Vor-und Nachteile der verschiedenen Systeme zu analysieren und den Versuch zu unternehmen, nach der idealen Form zu suchen oder zumindest deren wesentlichen Merkmale herauszukristallisieren. Das Wahlsystem Deutschlands spielt dabei eine wichtige Rolle. Im Lichte der jüngsten Wahlrechtsänderung des Deutschen Bundestages bekommt die Diskussion eine besondere Aktualität. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Politische Vierteljahresschrift is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)