Search

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is associated with its presentation in the pediatric population as roseola infantum. Rarely, it is the causative agent of encephalitis, with most cases reported among the immunocompromised population due to reactivation. This review article analyzes the published records of cases labeled HHV-6 encephalitis in immunocompetent adults, aiming to understand the diagnostic methods behind each case and explore the complexities of such a diagnosis. We note significant variability in the methods used to come to a diagnosis of HHV-6 encephalitis, as well as inconsistent approaches to treatment of this condition. Given the rarity of HHV-6 encephalitis in immunocompetent adults, there are no clearly structured diagnostic guidelines for this condition in this patient population. We highlight several diagnostic methods that provide more convincing evidence of true HHV-6 encephalitis and may provide a basis for further development of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Introduction: Reconstruction of critical bone defects is challenging. In a substantial subgroup of patients, conventional reconstructive techniques are insufficient. Biodegradable scaffolds have emerged as a novel tissue engineering strategy for critical-sized bone defect reconstruction. A corticoperiosteal flap integrates the hosts' ability to regenerate bone and permits the creation of a vascular axis for scaffold neo-vascularisation (regenerative matching axial vascularisation-RMAV). This phase IIa study evaluates the application of the RMAV approach alongside a custom medical-grade polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) scaffold (Osteopore) to regenerate bone sufficient to heal critical size defects in lower limb defects., Methods and Analysis: This open-label, single-arm feasibility trial will be jointly coordinated by the Complex Lower Limb Clinic (CLLC) at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Woolloongabba (Queensland, Australia), the Australian Centre for Complex Integrated Surgical Solutions (Queensland, Australia) and the Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology in Kelvin Grove (Queensland, Australia). Aiming for limb salvage, the study population (n=10) includes any patient referred to the CLLC with a critical-sized bone defect not amenable to conventional reconstructive approaches, after discussion by the interdisciplinary team. All patients will receive treatment using the RMAV approach using a custom mPCL-TCP implant. The primary study endpoint will be safety and tolerability of the reconstruction. Secondary end points include time to bone union and weight-bearing status on the treated limb. Results of this trial will help shape the role of scaffold-guided bone regenerative approaches in complex lower limb reconstruction where current options remain limited., Ethics and Dissemination: Approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the participating centre. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12620001007921., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DH is a shareholder in Osteopore (Osteopore International, Singapore). The remaining authors declare no competing interests relating to this paper., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: We describe the first clinical series of a novel bone replacement technique based on regenerative matching axial vascularisation (RMAV). This was used in four cases: a tibial defect after treatment of osteomyelitis; a calvarial defect after trauma and failed titanium cranioplasty; a paediatric tibial defect after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of Ewing sarcoma; and a paediatric mandibular deficiency resulting from congenital hemifacial microsomia., Method: All patients underwent reconstruction with three-dimensional (3D)-printed medical-grade polycaprolactone and tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) scaffolds wrapped in vascularised free corticoperiosteal flaps., Outcome: Functional volumes of load-sharing regenerate bone have formed in all cases after a moderate duration of follow-up. At 36 cm, case 1 remains the longest segment of load bearing bone ever successfully reconstructed. This technique offers an alternative to existing methods of large volume bone defect reconstruction that may be safe, reliable, and give predictable outcomes in challenging situations. It achieves this by using a bioresorbable scaffold to support and direct the growth of regenerate bone, driven by RMAV., Conclusion: This technique may facilitate the reconstruction of bone defects previously thought unreconstructable, reduce the risk of long-term implant-related complications and achieve these outcomes in a hostile environment. These potential benefits must now be formally tested in prospective clinical trials., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating condition and there is a lack of evidence to guide its management. We hypothesized that treatment success is independently associated with modifiable variables in surgical and antibiotic management., Methods: The is a prospective, observational study at 27 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Newly diagnosed large joint PJIs were eligible. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. The main outcome measures at 24 months were clinical cure (defined as all of the following: alive, absence of clinical or microbiological evidence of infection, and not requiring ongoing antibiotic therapy) and treatment success (clinical cure plus index prosthesis still in place)., Results: Twenty-four-month outcome data were available for 653 patients. Overall, 449 patients (69%) experienced clinical cure and 350 (54%) had treatment success. The most common treatment strategy was debridement and implant retention (DAIR), with success rates highest in early postimplant infections (119 of 160, 74%) and lower in late acute (132 of 267, 49%) and chronic (63 of 142, 44%) infections. Selected comorbidities, knee joint, and Staphylococcus aureus infections were independently associated with treatment failure, but antibiotic choice and duration (including rifampicin use) and extent of debridement were not., Conclusions: Treatment success in PJI is associated with (1) selecting the appropriate treatment strategy and (2) nonmodifiable patient and infection factors. Interdisciplinary decision making that matches an individual patient to an appropriate management strategy is a critical step for PJI management. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the role of rifampicin in patients managed with DAIR and the optimal surgical strategy for late-acute PJI., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Introduction: Rabies is fatal and can cause almost certain mortality in animals and humans. Effective post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using the rabies vaccine remains the cornerstone for preventing disease in humans. We present the first reported case of supporting the live purified-chick-embryo-cell rabies vaccine(PCECV) administration with prophylactic high-dose corticosteroids., Case: A 39-year-old female was at high-risk of developing rabies-like disease following a bat bite. She was commenced on PEP using PCECV. Our patient developed an anaphylactic reaction with bronchospasm and a rash following her 2 nd PCECV dose. Consequently, she received 2 days of loratadine and high-dose prednisolone prior to her final vaccination. During this administration in the emergency department, our patient completed the final PCECV dose. At a two-week follow-up, our patient had no evidence of rabies and had adequate viral neutralizing antibody levels detectable on serology., Discussion: Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions to PCECV are rare. Only 20 anaphylactic cases have been reported from a total of 1.1million administered doses over 8 years. Individuals at higher risk of anaphylaxis include those with a prior history of allergy to either egg white, gelatin, milk, penicillin, bee venom, or beef products. Administering high dose prophylactic corticosteroids prior to vaccination can potentially induce immune tolerance and minimize subsequent risks of hypersensitivity reactions. However, data relating to its use is extremely limited to only animal and limited human case-report data from other vaccines., Conclusion: We propose an alternative option which will require further research to manage vaccine-related anaphylaxis where immunization is an essential prophylactic requirement with the support of an immunologist and careful monitoring in an appropriate environment.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery. Most observational studies of PJI are retrospective or single-center, and reported management approaches and outcomes vary widely. We hypothesized that there would be substantial heterogeneity in PJI management and that most PJIs would present as late acute infections occurring as a consequence of bloodstream infections., Methods: The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective study at 27 hospitals. From July 2014 through December 2017, we enrolled all adults with a newly diagnosed PJI of a large joint. We collected data on demographics, microbiology, and surgical and antibiotic management over the first 3 months postpresentation., Results: We enrolled 783 patients (427 knee, 323 hip, 25 shoulder, 6 elbow, and 2 ankle). The mode of presentation was late acute (>30 days postimplantation and <7 days of symptoms; 351, 45%), followed by early (≤30 days postimplantation; 196, 25%) and chronic (>30 days postimplantation with ≥30 days of symptoms; 148, 19%). Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention constituted the commonest initial management approach (565, 72%), but debridement was moderate or less in 142 (25%) and the polyethylene liner was not exchanged in 104 (23%)., Conclusions: In contrast to most studies, late acute infection was the most common mode of presentation, likely reflecting hematogenous seeding. Management was heterogeneous, reflecting the poor evidence base and the need for randomized controlled trials., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Diabetic foot infections (DFI) present a major morbidity, mortality and economic challenge for the tertiary health sector. However, lack of high quality evidence for specific treatment regimens for patients with DFIs may result in inconsistent management. This study aimed to identify DFI caseload proportion and patterns of clinical practice of Infectious Diseases (ID) Physicians and Trainees within Australia and New Zealand., Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of Australian and New Zealand ID Physicians and Trainees was undertaken, to estimate the overall ID caseload devoted to patients with DFIs and assess clinicians' management practices of patients with DFIs., Results: Approximately 28% (142/499) of ID Physicians and Trainees from Australia and New Zealand responded to the survey. DFI made up 19.2% of all ID consultations. Involvement in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) was common as 77.5% (93/120) of those responding indicated their patients had access to an inpatient or outpatient MDT. Significant heterogeneity of antimicrobial treatments was reported, with 82 unique treatment regimens used by 102 respondents in one scenario and 76 unique treatment regimens used by 101 respondents in the second scenario. The duration of therapy and the choice of antibiotics for microorganisms isolated from superficial swabs also varied widely., Conclusions: Patients with DFIs represent a significant proportion of an ID clinician's caseload. This should be reflected in the ID training program. Large heterogeneity in practice between clinicians reflects a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials for patients with DFI and highlights the need for management guidelines informed by future trials., Competing Interests: This project was conducted as a quality initiative benchmarking current practice against the national therapeutic guidelines. Participants were aware of the nature of the project. Case vignettes were written specifically for this project and contained no real patient information. Ethical approval was not required for this survey of health professionals as it was assessed to have no ethical risk.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) has become established as a standard of care in most Australian hospitals to treat a variety of infections. Since 1998, the Alternate Site Infusion Service (ASIS) has provided an OPAT service to five hospitals in southern Brisbane, Queensland, using predominantly a patient or carer administration model (self-administered, S-OPAT). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of our S-OPAT programme., Methods: Consecutive patients treated by ASIS at the Princess Alexandra Hospital from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed. Data on patient demographics, diagnoses, microbiology, antimicrobial therapy, duration, outcome, and complications were sourced from a prospectively collected database and from patient medical records., Results: There were 150 episodes involving 144 patients resulting in 3520 days of OPAT; the median duration on the programme was 22 days (range 4–106 days). Patient or carer administration occurred in the majority of episodes. The most common indication by far was bone or joint infection (47% of patients), followed by infective endocarditis (9%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently treated organism. The overall cure rate was 93%. On multivariate analysis, patients with two or more comorbidities had an increased risk of failure. Line-related complications occurred in 1.4/1000 catheter-days. Rash was the most common drug-related event. Despite the extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics there were no cases of Clostridium difficile infection during therapy and for up to 28 days post cessation of intravenous antibiotics. The cost of OPAT per patient excluding drug administration and home visits was approximately A$ 150.00/day, significantly lower than the cost of an inpatient bed, which is estimated to be A$ 500–800/day.5 CONCLUSION: OPAT using a patient or carer administration model is an effective and safe option for the management of selected patients with infection requiring intravenous antibiotics.