Search

Introduction Increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) is associated with mortality in end-stage renal disease. LVMI regression may improve outcomes. Allopurinol has reduced LVMI in randomized controlled trials in chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and ischemic heart disease. This study investigated whether allopurinol would regress LVMI in hemodialysis patients. Methods This was a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter trial funded by the British Heart Foundation (PG/12/72/29743). A total of 80 patients undergoing regular maintenance hemodialysis were recruited from NHS Tayside, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Ayrshire and Arran in Scotland, UK. Participants were randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to 12 months of therapy with allopurinol 300 mg or placebo after each dialysis session. The primary outcome was change in LVMI, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) at baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were change in BP, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), augmentation indices (AIx), and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Results A total of 53 patients, with a mean age of 58 years, completed the study and had CMRI follow-up data for analysis. Allopurinol did not regress LVMI (change in LVMI: placebo +3.6 ± 10.4 g/m2; allopurinol: +1.6 ± 11 g/m2; P = 0.49). Allopurinol had no demonstrable effect on BP, FMD, AIx, or PWV. Conclusion Compared with placebo, treatment with allopurinol did not regress LVMI in this trial., Graphical abstract

Background E-cigarette (EC) use is increasing exponentially worldwide. The early cardiovascular effects of switching from tobacco cigarettes (TC) to EC in chronic smokers is unknown. Meta-analysis of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) studies indicate 13% lower pooled, adjusted relative risks of cardiovascular events with every 1% improvement in FMD. Objectives This study sought to determine the early vascular impact of switching from TC to EC in chronic smokers. Methods The authors conducted a prospective, randomized control trial with a parallel nonrandomized preference cohort and blinded endpoint of smokers ≥18 years of age who had smoked ≥15 cigarettes/day for ≥2 years and were free from established cardiovascular disease. Participants were randomized to EC with nicotine or EC without nicotine for 1 month. Those unwilling to quit continued with TC in a parallel preference arm. A propensity score analysis was done to adjust for differences between the randomized and preference arms. Vascular function was assessed by FMD and pulse wave velocity. Compliance with EC was measured by carbon monoxide levels. Results Within 1 month of switching from TC to EC, there was a significant improvement in endothelial function (linear trend β = 0.73%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41 to 1.05; p, Central Illustration

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of high-dose allopurinol on vascular oxidative stress (OS) and endothelial function in subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundAllopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, prolongs the time to chest pain during exercise in angina. We sought to ascertain whether allopurinol also improves endothelial dysfunction in optimally treated CAD patients, because such an effect might be of value to reduce future cardiovascular mortality. The mechanism of the anti-ischemic effect of allopurinol could be related to its reducing xanthine oxidase-induced OS, and our second aim was to see whether allopurinol really does reduce vascular tissue OS in CAD patients.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 80 patients with CAD, comparing allopurinol (600 mg/day) with placebo. Endothelial function was assessed by forearm venous occlusion plethysmography, flow-mediated dilation, and pulse wave analysis. Vascular OS was assessed by intra-arterial co-infusion of vitamin C and acetylcholine.ResultsCompared with placebo, allopurinol significantly improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation, by both forearm venous occlusion plethysmography (93 ± 67% vs. 145 ± 106%, p = 0.006) and flow-mediated dilation (4.2 ± 1.8% vs. 5.4 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001). Vascular oxidative stress was completely abolished by allopurinol. Central augmentation index improved significantly with allopurinol (2.6 ± 7.0%, p < 0.001) but not with placebo.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that, in optimally treated CAD patients, high-dose allopurinol profoundly reduces vascular tissue OS and improves 3 different measures of vascular/endothelial dysfunction. The former effect on OS might underpin the anti-ischemic effect of allopurinol in CAD. Both effects (on OS and endothelial dysfunction) increase the likelihood that high-dose allopurinol might reduce future cardiovascular mortality in CAD, over and above existing optimum therapy. (Exploring the therapeutic potential of xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol in angina; ISRCTN15253766)

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) with evolution of left ventricular mass (LVM) in optimally treated primary prevention patients. Background Patients who have an elevated BNP no cardiac abnormality on echocardiography are common and at increased risk of adverse events. One hypothesis is that an elevated BNP is an early sensitive indicator of who will develop future structural abnormalities such as left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Methods We identified optimally treated primary prevention patients with no cardiac abnormality at baseline. In particular, they had no myocardial ischemia, LV hypertrophy, LV dysfunction, or left atrial enlargement. They had a diverse range of plasma BNP levels and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline and 3 years later on a 3-T scanner. Results Fifty patients with a diverse range of BNP were studied (with BNP ≤10 pg/ml in 25 patients and >10 pg/ml in 25 patients). LVM increased (+4.7 ± 3.5 g) in 24 patients and decreased (–4.9 ± 2.8 g) in 26 patients (p < 0.01). Blood pressure by 24-h monitoring was virtually identical between those whose LVM increased (systolic blood pressure 122 ± 14 mm Hg) and those whose LVM decreased (systolic blood pressure 121 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 0.77). Plasma BNP was nearly 3 times higher in those whose LVM increased versus those in whom LVM decreased (21 ± 9.6 pg/ml vs. 7.9 ± 3.9 pg/ml, p < 0.01). The c-statistic for BNP was 0.88. Conclusions In optimally treated primary prevention patients, plasma BNP levels are able to distinguish between those whose LVM will increase during the next 3 years versus those whose LVM will decrease during the next 3 years. This may explain why individuals with high BNP are at increased risk even if no cardiac abnormality can be detected initially.

Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with higher prevalent blood pressure. We tested whether high-dose intermittent oral vitamin D therapy could reduce blood pressure and left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension resistant to conventional treatment. We conducted a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Patients with supine office blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg on ≥3 antihypertensive agents received 100 000 U oral vitamin D3 or matching placebo every 2 months. Office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol were measured at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months; left ventricular mass index was measured by cardiac MRI on a subgroup at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at 6 months. A total of 68 participants were randomized, 34 in each group. Mean age was 63 (SD 11) years, mean baseline office blood pressure was 154/84 (13/10) mm Hg, and mean baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 42 (16) nmol/L. Treatment with vitamin D did not reduce 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (adjusted treatment effects: systolic, +3 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, –4 to +11; P =0.33; diastolic, –2 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, –6 to +2; P =0.29); similar results were seen for office blood pressure. Left ventricular mass index was measured in a subgroup (n=25); no reduction was seen with vitamin D treatment (adjusted treatment effect, +4 g/m 2 ; 95% confidence interval, 0 to +7; P =0.04). There was no significant change in cholesterol or glucose levels. Thus, 6 months of intermittent, high-dose oral vitamin D3 did not reduce blood pressure or left ventricular mass in patients with resistant hypertension.