Search

Mast cells have crucial roles in allergic and other inflammatory diseases. Preclinical approaches provide circumstantial evidence for mast cell involvement in many diseases, but these studies have major limitations - for example, there is still a lack of suitable mouse models for some mast cell-driven diseases such as urticaria. Some approaches for studying mast cells are invasive or can induce severe reactions, and very few mediators or receptors are specific for mast cells. Recently, several drugs that target human mast cells have been developed. These include monoclonal antibodies and small molecules that can specifically inhibit mast cell degranulation via key receptors (such as FceRI), that block specific signal transduction pathways involved in mast cell activation (for example, BTK), that silence mast cells via inhibitory receptors (such as Siglec-8) or that reduce mast cell numbers and prevent their differentiation by acting on the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KIT. In this Review, we discuss the existing and emerging therapies that target mast cells, and we consider how these treatments can help us to understand mast cell functions in disease.

Background. Mast cells (MCs) are considered the main effectors in allergic reactions and well known for their contribution to the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases, urticaria, and mastocytosis. To study their functions in vitro, human primary MCs are isolated directly from several tissues or differentiated from hematopoietic progenitors. However, these techniques bear several disadvantages and challenges including low proliferation capacity, donor-dependent heterogeneity, and the lack of a continuous cell source. Objective. To address this, we developed a novel strategy for the rapid and efficient differentiation of MCs from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Methods. A 4-step protocol for the generation of hiPSC-derived MCs, based on the use of 3 hiPSC lines, was established and validated by comparison with human skin MCs and peripheral hematopoietic stem cell-derived MCs. Results. hiPSC-MCs share phenotypic and functional characteristics of human skin MCs and peripheral hematopoietic stem cell-derived MCs. They display stable expression of the MC-associated receptors CD117, FceRIa, and Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 and degranulate in response to IgE/anti-IgE and substance P. Conclusions. This novel hiPSC-based approach provides a sustainable and homogeneous source for a rapid and highly productive generation of phenotypically mature, functional MCs, and its principle allows for the investigation of disease- and patient-specific MC populations.

Background: Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is characterized by three diagnostic criteria: (1) episodic mast cell (MC)-driven signs/symptoms of at least two organ systems in the absence of clonal MC expansion and definite triggers, (2) episodic increase in tryptase, and (3) response to MC-targeted treatment. Many patients believe they have MCAS, but how often this is the case remains unknown. Methods: We prospectively investigated patients with suspected MCAS (n = 100) for the diagnostic criteria including baseline tryptase, KIT D816V mutation, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over the course of 12 weeks. Comorbid depression and anxiety were explored with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: In 53% of our patients (80% females), suspicion of MCAS was based on self-evaluation. In total, patients reported 87 different symptoms, mostly fatigue (n = 57), musculoskeletal pain/weakness (n = 49), and abdominal pain (n = 43), with overall high disease activity and impact. Two of 79 patients had increased tryptase (by >20% +2 ng/ml) following an episode. Only 5%, with any of the PROMs used, showed complete response to MC-targeted treatment. Depression and anxiety disorders were frequent comorbidities (n = 23 each), and 65 patients had pathological HADS values, which were linked to high disease impact and poor symptom control. Conclusion: Mast cell activation syndrome was confirmed in only 2% of patients, which implies that it is not MC activation that drives signs and symptoms in most patients with suspected MCAS. There is a high need for comprehensive research efforts aimed at the identification of the true underlying pathomechanism(s) in patients with suspected MCAS.