Search

Objective investigation of new inhibitors of blood protein or cellular systems that are activated during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is impeded by the absence of a satisfactory animal model. Because most baboon hematologic proteins immunologically cross-react with those used for human assays, we developed a robust, reusable baboon model of CPB. Blood samples were obtained from adult baboons at six time intervals before, during, and after 60 minutes of partial CPB at 37 degrees C with peripheral cannulas. Both membrane (n = 7) and bubble oxygenators (n = 7) were investigated. We measured platelet and white blood cell counts; platelet response to adenosine diphosphate and release of beta-thromboglobulin; fibrinopeptide A, prothrombin fragment F1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, and plasmin-antiplasmin complex; activated complement (C3b/c and C4b/c); elastase-alpha1 proteinase inhibitor complex; and bleeding times. Adherent glycoprotein IIIa antigen in Triton X-100 washes of the perfusion circuit was also measured. Markers of baboon platelet, complement, and neutrophil activation and thrombosis significantly increased during CPB with bubble oxygenator systems but did not change appreciably in membrane oxygenator circuits. Markers of fibrinolysis, D-dimer, and plasmin-antiplasmin complex did not change with either oxygenator. The baboon model of CPB, when a bubble oxygenator is used, is a robust, reusable animal model for evaluating inhibitors of platelet, complement, and neutrophil activation and thrombosis during and after CPB.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss after cardiac surgery, particularly in patients taking aspirin. This study was performed to evaluate whether the reduction of contact phase activation by aprotinin is related to decreased complement activation during blood activation. Two hundred patients were prospectively operated on for coronary artery bypass. Aprotinin was used in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) prime if aspirin was not discontinued 10 days before surgery and in patients undergoing second operation (n = 102). Blood loss was significantly reduced in patients receiving aprotinin (596 +/- 309 ml vs 754 +/- 329 ml without aprotinin; p = 0.0001), as was the need for transfusion (13% vs 34% without aprotinin; p = 0.0001) after surgery. Blood activation has been studied in 60 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that contact phase activation, as assessed by maximum values of C1 inhibitor/kallikrein complexes, was reduced by aprotinin treatment (p < 0.0001). Fibrinolytic activity decreased with aprotinin treatment, as reflected by lower values of D-dimers at the end of CPB (p < 0.0001). In addition, thrombin generation, as assessed by F1 + 2 scission peptide, was reduced by aprotinin (p = 0.01). However, the stepwise regression model emphasized that activation of the alternative and classic complement pathways, as reflected by C3b/c and C4b/c levels, was not affected by aprotinin; neither was leukocyte activation, as reflected by elastase release. These results suggest that aprotinin does not combine the reduction of complement activation with the reduced activation of the contact phase, fibrinolysis, or coagulation during CPB for coronary artery surgery.