Search

BackgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest form of stroke. In observational studies, lower serum magnesium has been linked to more hematoma expansion (HE) and intracranial hemorrhage, implying that supplemental magnesium sulfate is a potential acute treatment for patients with ICH and could reduce HE. FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy - Magnesium) was a clinical trial of magnesium sulfate started prehospital in patients with acute stroke within 2 hours of last known well enrolled. CT was not required prior to enrollment, and several hundred patients with acute ICH were enrolled. In this ancillary analysis, we assessed the effect of magnesium sulfate treatment upon HE in patients with acute ICH.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data that were prospectively collected in the FAST-MAG study. Patients received intravenous magnesium sulfate or matched placebo within 2 hours of onset. We compared HE among patients allocated to intravenous magnesium sulfate or placebo with a Mann-Whitney U. We used the same method to compare neurological deficit severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) and global disability (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months.ResultsAmong 268 patients with ICH meeting study entry criteria, mean 65.4±13/4 years, 33% were female, and 211 (79%) had a history of hypertension. Initial deficit severities were median (interquartile range) of 4 (3-5) on the Los Angeles Motor Scale in the field and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 16 (9.5-25.5) early after hospital arrival. Follow-up brain imaging was performed a median of 17.1 (11.3-22.7) hours after first scan. The magnesium and placebo groups did not statistically differ in hematoma volume on arrival, 10.1 (5.6-28.7) versus 12.4 (5.6-28.7) mL (P=0.6), or HE, 2.0 (0.1-7.4) versus 1.5 (-0.2 to 8) mL (P=0.5). There was no difference in functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6), 59% versus 50% (P=0.5).ConclusionsMagnesium sulfate did not reduce HE or improve functional outcomes at 90 days. A benefit for patients with initial hypomagnesemia was not addressed.RegistrationURL: https://www.Clinicaltrialsgov; Unique identifier: NCT00059332.

The use of advanced imaging in routine diagnostic practice appears to provide only limited value in patients with migraine who have not experienced recent changes in headache characteristics or symptoms. However, advanced imaging may have potential for studying the biological manifestations and pathophysiology of migraine headaches. Migraine with aura appears to have characteristic spatiotemporal changes in structural anatomy, function, hemodynamics, metabolism, and biochemistry, whereas migraine without aura produces more subtle and complex changes. Large, controlled, multicenter imaging-based observational trials are needed to confirm the anecdotal evidence in the literature and test the scientific hypotheses thought to underscore migraine pathophysiology.

Background and purposeTo compare the diagnostic performance of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion in detecting cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes before and after endovascular recanalization in acute ischemic syndrome.MethodsThe inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were patients with acute ischemic syndrome who underwent endovascular recanalization and acquisition of both ASL and DSC before and after revascularization. ASL-CBF and multiparametric DSC maps were evaluated for image quality, location, and type of perfusion abnormality. Relative CBF (rCBF) was calculated in the infarction core and hypoperfused areas using coregistered ASL and DSC. Core and hypoperfused rCBF were used for paired pretreatment and posttreatment comparisons. Interobserver and intermodality agreement were evaluated by κ test, and t test was calculated for ASL and DSC rCBF values.ResultsTwenty-five patients met our inclusion criteria. Five studies were rated nondiagnostic, resulting in 45 pairs of DSC-ASL available for comparison. ASL and DSC agreed on type and location of the perfusion abnormality in 71% and 80% of cases, respectively. The image quality of ASL was lower than DSC, resulting in interobserver variability for the type (κ=0.45) and location (κ=0.56) of perfusion abnormality. ASL was unable to show any type of perfusion abnormality in 11% of patients. In successfully recanalized patients, hyperperfusion (rCBF >1) was detected in 100% on DSC and 47% on ASL.ConclusionsASL is less sensitive than DSC for detecting rCBF changes in patients with acute ischemic syndrome, particularly with respect to hyperperfusion after successful recanalization.

Background: Magnesium (Mg) is a neuroprotectant in preclinical models. Lower serum Mg levels have been associated with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in patients with ischemic stroke. Early treatment of acute ischemic stroke with Mg may reduce rates of symptomatic HT. Methods: In this post hoc study of the Field Administration of Stroke Therapy Magnesium (FAST-MAG) trial, 1,245 participants with a diagnosis of cerebral ischemia received 20 g of Mg or placebo initiated in the prehospital setting. Posttreatment serum Mg level was measured for 809 participants. Cases of clinical deterioration, defined as worsening by ≥4 points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), were imaged and evaluated for etiology. Symptomatic HT was defined as deterioration with imaging showing new hemorrhage. Results: Clinical deterioration occurred in 187 and symptomatic HT in 46 of 1,245 cases of cerebral ischemia. Rates of deterioration and symptomatic HT were not significantly lower in those who received Mg (15.7% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.591; 2.8% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.281). In cases where serum Mg level was obtained posttreatment, lower serum Mg level (<1.7 mg/dL) was associated with significantly higher rates of deterioration and symptomatic HT (27.5% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.0261; 11.6% vs. 3.65%, p = 0.00819). Conclusions: Treatment with Mg did not significantly reduce rates of clinical deterioration or symptomatic HT. Future analysis should address whether treatment with Mg could have influenced the subgroup with low serum Mg at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]