Search

Bioethanol is commonly recovered from fermentation broth via distillation because it is the most economical and reliable process for large-scale industrial operations. Because extraction is a highly energy-efficient process applicable to low-composition bio-product separation, high-performance solvents are necessary for efficient bioethanol recovery. 2-Methyl pentanol, a branched long-chain alcohol, which was used as the extraction solvent, and a deep eutectic solvent, choline chloride and ethylene glycol (1:2), was employed as an entrainer for product refinement. Thermodynamic models of vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) and liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) systems were derived using molecular simulations and experimental results to develop the bioethanol extraction and refinement processes. The heat duty of the designed process was reduced by a quarter compared to that of previous recovery processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bioethanol is the most widely used alternative transportation fuel to petrol. Bioethanol is considered a clean, renewable, and environmentally friendly fuel that can contribute to climate change mitigation, decreased environmental pollution, and enhanced energy security. Commercial bioethanol production is based on traditional agricultural crops such as corn, sugarcane, and sugarbeet, primarily used as food and feed. In order to meet the growing demand for this fuel and decrease competition in the food and biofuel sectors for the same feedstock, other raw materials and process technologies have been intensively studied. Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most abundant renewable resources, with it being rich in compounds that could be processed into energy, transportation fuels, various chemical compounds, and diverse materials. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has received substantial attention in recent decades. This review gives an overview of bioethanol production steps from lignocellulosic biomass and challenges in the production process. The following aspects of bioethanol production are covered here, including pretreatment methods, process strategies, strain development, ethanol isolation and purification, and technical hurdles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bioethanol is the most widely used alternative transportation fuel to petrol. Bioethanol is considered a clean, renewable, and environmentally friendly fuel that can contribute to climate change mitigation, decreased environmental pollution, and enhanced energy security. Commercial bioethanol production is based on traditional agricultural crops such as corn, sugarcane, and sugarbeet, primarily used as food and feed. In order to meet the growing demand for this fuel and decrease competition in the food and biofuel sectors for the same feedstock, other raw materials and process technologies have been intensively studied. Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most abundant renewable resources, with it being rich in compounds that could be processed into energy, transportation fuels, various chemical compounds, and diverse materials. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has received substantial attention in recent decades. This review gives an overview of bioethanol production steps from lignocellulosic biomass and challenges in the production process. The following aspects of bioethanol production are covered here, including pretreatment methods, process strategies, strain development, ethanol isolation and purification, and technical hurdles.

• Continuous removal of ethanol from dilute mixtures using hot-microbubbles. • Ethanol concentration maintained below the inhibition threshold for organism TM242. • An ethanol productivity up to 14.9 g L−1h−1 was supported by the stripping unit. Product inhibition is a barrier to many fermentation processes, including bioethanol production, and is responsible for dilute product streams which are energy intensive to purify. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether hot microbubble stripping could be used to remove ethanol continuously from dilute ethanol–water mixtures expected in a bioreactor and maintain ethanol concentrations below the inhibitory levels for the thermophile Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius (TM242), that can utilize a range of sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass. A custom-made microbubble stripping unit that produces clouds of hot microbubbles (~120 °C) by fluidic oscillation was used to remove ethanol from ~2% (v/v) ethanol–water mixtures maintained at 60 °C. Ethanol was continuously added to the unit to simulate microbial metabolism. The initial liquid height and the ethanol addition rate were varied from 10 to 50 mm and 2.1–21.2 g h−1 respectively. In all the experiments, ethanol concentration was maintained well below the inhibition threshold of the target organism (~2% [v/v]). This microbubble stripping unit has the potential to operate in conjunction with a 0.5–1.0 L fermenter to allow an ethanol productivity of 14.9–7.8 g L−1h−1 continuously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this work, we performed recovery of ethanol from a fermentation broth of banana pseudostem by pervaporation (PV) as a lower‐energy‐cost alternative to traditional separation processes such as distillation. As real fermentation systems generally contain by‐products, it was investigated the effects of different components from the fermentation broth of banana pseudostem on PV performance for ethanol recovery through commercial flat sheet polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane. The experiments were compared to a binary solution (ethanol/water) to determine differences in the results due to the presence of fermentation by‐products. A real fermented broth of banana pseudostem was also used as feed for the PV experiments. Seven by‐products from fermented broth were identified: propanol, isobutanol, methanol, isoamyl alcohol, 1‐pentanol, acetic acid, and succinic acid. Moreover, the residual sugar content of 3.02 g/L1 was obtained. The presence of methanol showed the best results for total permeate flux (0.1626 kg·m−2·h−1) and ethanol permeate flux (0.0391 kg·m−2·h−1) during PV at 25°C and 3 wt% ethanol, also demonstrated by the selectivity and enrichment factor. The lowest total fluxes of permeate were observed in the experiments containing the acids. Better permeance of 0.1171 from 0.0796 kg·m−2·h−1 and membrane selectivity of 9.77 from 9.30 were obtained with real fermentation broth than with synthetic solutions, possibly due to the presence of by‐products in the multicomponent mixtures, which contributed to ethanol permeation. The results of this work indicate that by‐products influence pervaporation of ethanol with hydrophobic flat sheet membrane produced from the fermented broth of banana pseudostem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) is an attractive variant of the novel membrane distillation process, which is promising for various separations, including water desalination and bioethanol recovery through fermentation of agro-industrial by-products. This publication is part of an effort to develop a capillary membrane module for various applications, as well as a model that would facilitate VMD process design. Experiments were conducted in a laboratory pilot VMD unit, comprising polypropylene capillary-membrane modules. Performance data, collected at modest temperatures (37 °C to 65 °C) with deionized and brackish water, confirmed the improved system productivity with increasing feed-water temperature; excellent salt rejection was obtained. The recovery of ethanol from ethanol-water mixtures and from fermented winery by-products was also studied, in continuous, semi-continuous, and batch operating modes. At low-feed-solution temperature (27–47 °C), ethanol-solution was concentrated 4 to 6.5 times in continuous operation and 2 to 3 times in the semi-continuous mode. Taking advantage of the small property variation in the module axial-flow direction, a simple VMD process model was developed, satisfactorily describing the experimental data. This VMD model appears to be promising for practical applications, and warrants further R&D work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this manuscript was the study of the recovery of bioethanol produced by the fermentation of the lignocellulosic biomass (olive bagasse) by nanofiltration. In terms of downstream processing, the nanofiltration permeate stream was expected to be comprised mostly of water and ethanol, and as such, ethanol may be further recovered by conventional distillation. Different nanofiltration membranes (NF90 and NF270) were tested for their efficiency in the separation of bioethanol. Model aqueous solutions of ethanol and sugars, and real liquors were processed by nanofiltration focusing on flux and rejection performance. The results shown that the more complex medium of a real liquor interacts with the membrane and lower the rejection to target solutes. Generally, both membranes tested were suitable for separating and recovering ethanol from a fermentation medium. The diafiltration mathematical model developed in this work shown to be capable of describing experimental results, which may be considered extremely important for process design and scaling up purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]