Search

Background: The prognosis in patients with breast cancer with isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) without simultaneous distant metastases after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognosis in this patient population. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective observational study evaluated 3295 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent IBR at 12 Japanese medical facilities between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016. The outcome measures were the prognostic factors for ILRR after IBR, 5-year distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI), and 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: Mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy was performed in 3295 patients. ILRR occurred in 70 patients, and the median observation period from ILRR diagnosis was 39.3 months. Of the 70 patients, 9 (12.9%) had axillary lymph node recurrence (ALNR) at the time of ILRR diagnosis. The 5-year DMFI and OS rates after ILRR were 92.4% and 91.2%, respectively. Pathological lymph node metastasis at primary surgery (P = 0.041) and ALNR (P = 0.022) at ILRR were significantly associated with DMFI in the univariate analysis. ALNR was the only independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.041). Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT; P = 0.022) and ALNR (P = 0.043) were significantly associated with OS in the univariate analysis, and both PMRT (P = 0.010) and ALNR (P = 0.028) were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis for OS. Conclusions: Although patients with breast cancer who had ILRR after IBR have favorable prognosis, ALNR may lead to poor prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the prognosis of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Breast reconstruction is an important part of the treatment of breast cancer. In modern implant-based immediate breast reconstruction, it is common to use acellular dermal or synthetic meshes in combination with an implant. Here, we describe a prospective cohort study to report the use of a breast implant only versus an implant with a biological mesh in the immediate reconstruction. Breast reconstruction was performed after two types of therapeutic mastectomies (skin-sparing or nipple-sparing), in order to improve aesthetic results and patient wellbeing, and to decrease morbidities and surgical complications. We assessed the patient satisfaction with their breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, that allows the measuring of the level of satisfaction with the professional, the achieved results and self-perception. We try to contribute in establishment of biological matrices use to achieve the best result in such a delicate moment which is mastectomy therapeutic decision. We evaluate postoperative complications, aesthetic results and satisfaction outcomes in patients with breast cancer after intervening with a skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with an immediate prosthetic reconstruction with or without a biological mesh. Patients with multifocal breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ with an indication for a mastectomy and cT2 tumors with no response to primary systemic treatment were included, whereas patients aged >75 years, with inflammatory carcinoma, and severe circulatory disorders were excluded. Patients in the control group were reconstructed using a prosthesis, whereas the study group included patients reconstructed using a prosthesis and biological acellular porcine dermal mesh (Strattice™). In both groups, the result was assessed using the BREAST-Q instrument. A total of 51 patients (62 intervened breasts) were included in the study group and 38 patients (41 intervened breasts) in the control group. Implant loss and removal occurred in three patients in the study group (5.9%) and nine patients in the control group (24.3%; p = 0.030). Infections appeared in three patients in the study group (4.8%) and three patients in the control group (7.3%; p = 1.00). Skin necrosis appeared in 5 patients in the study group (12.2%) and 11 patients in the control group (21.6%; p = 0.367). Seroma appeared in five patients in the study group (12.2%) and five patients in the control group (8.1%; p = 0.514). The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a comparison between both groups regarding "satisfaction with breasts after surgery" (p = 0.026), "sexual well-being after intervention" (p = 0.010) and "satisfaction with the information received" (p = 0.049). We have noted a statistically significant decrease in implant loss in women receiving an implant with a biological mesh. A higher satisfaction was observed in patients reconstructed using Strattice™, with statistically significant differences in three items. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Both skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have been widely adopted. Although postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can improve clinical outcomes, it can worsen cosmesis following reconstruction. Therefore, identifying risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) could help de-escalate PMRT after NSM/SSM in patients with pT1-2 disease. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSM (N = 400) and NSM (N = 156) in patients with pT1-2N0-1 disease between 2009 and 2016. Seventy-four patients received PMRT with 50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of IBTR. Results: With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 17 IBTR events were observed, with 5-year IBTR-free rate of 97.2%. Although only one IBTR was observed after PMRT, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year IBTR-free rate (PMRT vs. no PMRT, 98.6% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.360). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age ≤45 years and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were adverse features of IBTR. The low-risk group (0 risk factor) showed a better 5-year IBTR-free rate than the high-risk group (≥1 risk factor) (100.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.003). In the high-risk group, PMRT slightly improved 5-year IBTR-free rate compared with no PMRT (98.6% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.166). In addition, PMRT increased 5-year cumulative incidence of reconstruction failure (10.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: We identified risk factors (age and LVI) related to IBTR following upfront SSM/NSM with pT1-2 disease. As a hypothesis-generating study, de-escalation of PMRT by omitting chest wall irradiation in selective patients could improve reconstruction-related complications without compromising oncologic outcomes.

For Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), recurrence is shown to be higher after skin-sparing (SSM) versus simple (SM) mastectomy. This study aimed to compare the two groups recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall (OS) survival. We conducted a retrospective register-based cohort study of women operated with SSM (n = 338) or SM (n = 238) for DCIS between 2007 and 2017. Data from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry was used to estimate recurrences rates, DFS and OS. Mean age was 51 and 61 years in the SSM and SM groups, respectively. Median follow-up time was 77 months for SSM (range: 21–152 months) vs 84 months for SM (range: 7–171 months). After five years of follow-up, the overall recurrence rate (OR) was 2.1%; 3.9% for SSM and 0.9% for SM. After ten years, the rates were 3.0%, 6.2% for SSM and still 0.9% for SM. DFS was after ten years 92.2%; 91.8% for SSM, and 92.4% for SM. OS was 95.0%; 97.5% for SSM and 93.3% for SM at ten years. For SSM, involved margins represented a significant risk for recurrence. The recurrence rate was higher in the SSM versus the SM group. Whether the difference is due to the operating procedures or underlying risk factors remains unknown. When stratifying for the difference in age, there was no statistical difference in DFS or OS. Involved margins in the SSM group were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have been widely adopted. Although postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can improve clinical outcomes, it can worsen cosmesis following reconstruction. Therefore, identifying risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) could help de-escalate PMRT after NSM/SSM in patients with pT1-2 disease. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSM (N = 400) and NSM (N = 156) in patients with pT1-2N0-1 disease between 2009 and 2016. Seventy-four patients received PMRT with 50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of IBTR. With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 17 IBTR events were observed, with 5-year IBTR-free rate of 97.2%. Although only one IBTR was observed after PMRT, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year IBTR-free rate (PMRT vs. no PMRT, 98.6% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.360). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age ≤45 years and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were adverse features of IBTR. The low-risk group (0 risk factor) showed a better 5-year IBTR-free rate than the high-risk group (≥1 risk factor) (100.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.003). In the high-risk group, PMRT slightly improved 5-year IBTR-free rate compared with no PMRT (98.6% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.166). In addition, PMRT increased 5-year cumulative incidence of reconstruction failure (10.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.001). We identified risk factors (age and LVI) related to IBTR following upfront SSM/NSM with pT1-2 disease. As a hypothesis-generating study, de-escalation of PMRT by omitting chest wall irradiation in selective patients could improve reconstruction-related complications without compromising oncologic outcomes. • IBTR-free rate at 5 years after SSM/NSM in pT1-2N0-1 disease was 97.2%. • Age ≤45 years and tumor with LVI were associated with increased IBTR rate. • Omitting chest wall RT to selective patients could improve reconstruction outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women, accounting for ∼30.7% of all incident cancers among women. Conservative mastectomies such as skinsparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy aim for breast reconstruction, thus improving the quality of life and the psychological damages in patients with breast cancer. Breast reconstruction can be done either immediately or delayed, using prosthesis as implants or temporary expanders or autogenous tissue as flaps from the anterior abdominal wall as the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM) or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) flaps or from the back as the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Aim The present study assesses the lipofilled LD muscle flap in immediate autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy as regards feasibility, complications, and cosmetic outcome. Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 20 patients with breast cancer, who were candidates for skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, or skinreducing mastectomy and aiming for complete autologous breast reconstruction. Patients were admitted to the Surgical Oncology Unit, Alexandria Main University Hospital. Results Majority of patients (12 patients) were of age less than 50 years with a BMI ranging from 23.2 to 35. Fourteen (70%) patients had moderate breast size (cup B) and 12 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Operative time ranged from 105 to 225 min. Size of the flap ranged from 150 to 300 cm² with the harvested fat ranging from 180 to 300 ml. Complications were detected in six patients mostly back seroma and one case of flap necrosis and wound dehiscence and one case of LD muscle twitches. Most of the patients were very to moderately satisfied with the final outcome with two cases needed relipofilling after a follow-up for about 18 months. Conclusion Lipofilling of the LD myocutaneous flap aiming for breast reconstruction following mastectomy is an easy, versatile technique that overcomes the drawback of the small-sized LD flap and need for implants. The technique shows excellence in terms of neoadjuvant setting and in correction of complication of implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR)., Methods: The records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared., Results: Surgical training outcomes of BMR group (N = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group (N = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss (P = .011) and surgery time (P < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group (N = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis (P < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group (P = .002)., Conclusion: Compared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mastectomy is performed prior to or concurrently with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. However, the complication rates of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) versus skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with DIEP are not well-characterized., Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent SSM or NSM with DIEP reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 at an academic institution. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Variables were compared using Student's t-tests/Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests., Results: Of 535 patients, 195 (36%) underwent NSM and 340 (64%) underwent SSM. The 30-day postoperative complication rates did not differ between cohorts (16.4% in NSM vs. 16.8% in SSM, p > 0.9). The NSM cohort had a higher rate of any flap necrosis (9.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.01) compared to the SSM cohort, though rates of total DIEP flap loss rate did not differ (4.1% vs. 1.5% respectively). Site-wide total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. The NSM cohort had smaller preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distances (25.0 vs. 26.5 cm, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of preoperative radiation therapy (28.2% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.002) compared to the SSM cohort. The cohorts did not differ in demographic or operative variables including reconstruction timing (delayed vs. immediate interval), readmission, and reoperation., Conclusions: Individuals who received an NSM prior to DIEP reconstruction had more flap complications compared to the SSM cohort. Both cohorts had comparable overall 30-day postoperative complication rates and demographic variables, and rate of total DIEP flap loss was 2.4%. Patient preference can further guide surgical decision-making., (© 2024 The Author(s). Microsurgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Approximately 268,600 new breast cancer diagnoses and 41,760 cancer-related deaths in the U.S. were estimated for 2019. SSM (skin sparing mastectomy) is defined as a simple or radical surgery with modified minimal incisions that retain the widest possible coverage and sub-cutaneous breast groove but dry the NAC, flaws of previous biopsies and/or scarring caused by diagnostic percutaneous biopsies. Access to the armpit for a possible sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection is obtained through the same incision. An additional incision may be necessary to perform the reconstructive procedure (e.g., microsurgical axillary anastomosis). Objective: To study the risks and benefits of use subcutaneous mastectomy with silicon prosthesis as treatment of early breast cancer: as regards the impact of radiotherapy administration on implant, psychological impact, operative time and post-operative complications including complication of silicon, effect on wound healing. Patients and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at tertiary care hospital at the general surgery department in Ain Shams University hospitals and Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST) hospital and from November 2021, till July 2022 and performed on total 15 females suffering from stage I-II infiltrating breast carcinomas. Results: The current study revealed that mean ±SD of age of the studied cases was 46.3 ±7.4. Regarding tumor site, LOQ was the most frequent (40.0%), followed by UIQ (33.3%), then UOQ (20.0%) and lastly LIQ (6.7%). Concerning T grades, T1 was in (46.7%), while the remaining (53.3%) were T2. Concerning N grades, N0 was in (73.3%), while the remaining (26.7%) were N1. Sentinel lymph nodes done in 73.3% of cases. As regards operative characteristics, Axillary clearance done in less than half of cases (46.7%), while nipple sparing achieved in less than quarter of cases (20.0%). As regards post-mastectomy treatment, majority of cases (86.7%) received hormonal therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy to axilla was (46.7%), chemotherapy (33.3%), while immunotherapy was (6.7%). As regards postoperative side effects, Pain was the most frequent postoperative side effect; detected in (33.3%) of cases, followed by seroma (20.0%), then flap necrosis (13.3%), and the least frequent was hematoma (6.7%). As regards postoperative patients' satisfaction, mean ±SD of Postoperative patients' satisfaction was 7.361.5 with range 5.0 -10.0. Near half of the studied cases (46.7%) had 7.0 - 8.0 satisfaction grade. Conclusion: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate subcutaneous silicon implantation are an acceptable and safe method for breast reconstruction. It offers a number of advantages including ease of dissection for surgeons, improved symmetry, and low complication rates. With improvements in surgical techniques in preserving mastectomy skin flap viability, the traditionally higher rates of complications in subcutaneous implants may be outdated. The present study can burden the knowledge and shed some light on future prospective studies with larger sample sizes to evaluate a cost benefit analysis and patient and surgeon assessment of outcomes to directly compare with traditional submuscular single- or 2- stage implant-based reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionAutologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) represent the most common procedures after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy. This cross-sectional study is a comprehensive analysis of ABR and IBR considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes.Patients and methodsEligible patients underwent breast reconstruction (ABR and IBR) after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy between January 2014 and December 2020. Outcome parameters included quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC - QLQ30, BR23, Breast-Q, CES-D), complication rates, aesthetic result, and breast sensitivity.Results108 patients participated in the study (IBR: n = 72, age 48.9 ± 9.9 years; ABR: n = 36, age: 46.6 ± 7.3 years). Mean follow-up was 27.1 ± 9.3 (IBR) and 34.9 ± 20.5 (ABR), respectively. IBR patients suffered significantly more often from major complications (30.6% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.01), while ABR patients underwent secondary procedures significantly more often to improve the aesthetic result (55.6% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.004). Unilateral reconstructions revealed superior aesthetic results in ABR (n.s.), while in bilateral reconstruction IBR tended to score higher (n.s.). Scar evaluation resulted in a better result of IBR in both categories (p

Nick Spindler,1 Franziska Ebel,1 Susanne Briest,2 Sandra Wallochny,2 Stefan Langer1 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 2Department of Gynecology, Women’s and Children’s Centre, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyCorrespondence: Nick SpindlerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, Leipzig, 04103, GermanyTel +49-341-9717140Fax +49-341-9717139Email nick.spindler@medizin.uni-leipzig.dePurpose: Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) can reduce the risk of developing breast cancer by up to 95% in women with increased exposure. Although survival is increased, mastectomies can adversely affect a patient physically, psychologically, and psychosexually. High health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often achieved after simultaneous breast reconstruction (BR) following BRRM; however, data on the pre- and postoperative results of HRQoL are lacking. Therefore, we investigated the quality of life, esthetic outcome, and patient well-being after BRRM and simultaneous implant-based BR.Patients and Methods: Of the 35 patients who underwent skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy between May 2012 and December 2017 at a university hospital, only 22 completed the evaluation. Baseline data and data on previous operations and operation techniques were retrieved from the patient’s charts. BREAST-Q and short form-36 health survey (SF-36) questionnaires were used to evaluate patient satisfaction and HRQoL.Results: SF-36 analysis showed a significantly higher score for pain (p=0.043) in our population than in the general female population. Comparing the pre- and postoperative BREAST-Q results, a significant decrease in the physical well-being of the chest (p=0.0179) and a slight improvement in breast satisfaction were observed (p=0.3266). All patients were well-satisfied with the postoperative outcome, reconstruction, and perioperative surgeon care.Conclusion: Bilateral mastectomy with simultaneous BR using pre-pectoral implants is associated with an HRQoL similar to that of the healthy population. Although bilateral mastectomy may have an immense effect on the psychological, physical, and social aspects, immediate BR preserves the outer appearance and improves self-esteem.Keywords: risk-reducing mastectomy, implant-based reconstruction, BRCA1, BRCA2, skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparring mastectomy

Background: The introduction of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate reconstruction allowed a noticeable improvement in reconstructive surgery aesthetic results and patients’ psychophysical well-being. In any case, there are still concerns about the long-term oncological safety of these two procedures. This study aims to assess the oncological outcomes of women who underwent SSM and NSM and to compare them with traditional modified total mastectomy (MTM). The secondary outcome was to compare mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) outcome. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review study concerning all patients who had experienced SSM and NSM in our Clinic between January 2004 and July 2013. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrences cumulative rate. Results: Among this study’s 1836 invasive breast carcinomas, we found NSM (86.7, 95% confidence interval (CI), 76.7–98.0%) to have a significantly shorter 5-year DFS than MTM (90.4%, 95% CI, 87.9–93.0%). Furthermore, low body mass index (odds ratio (OR) 0.733, p = 0.056), basal-like molecular subtype (OR 28.932, p < 0.05), extended intraductal component (OR 11.160, p = 0.107), and lymph node metastasis extracapsular invasion (OR 8.727, p = 0.077) were the most significant predictors of recurrence in women treated with NSM. Furthermore, patients with BCS had significantly longer OS and DFS than those who underwent MTM. Conclusions: Occult nipple neoplastic involvement following negative intraoperative histological examination of subareolar tissue may explain the higher recurrence rate among women undergoing NSM. Patients with one or more risk factors for recurrence after NSM, such as basal-like molecular subtype, extended intraductal component, and extracapsular invasion of lymph node metastasis, should be given special attention.

Mastectomy may be needed in the context of previous radiotherapy in cases of breast carcinoma following mantle field radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma or in cases of local relapse or second primary tumours after breast conserving therapy including whole-breast irradiation (BCT). The outcome of combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (SSM-IIBR) has been reported to be unfavourable in these cases. To compare the outcome of SSM-IIBR after mantle field radiotherapy to that after BCT and to compare both to the outcome observed in non-irradiated breasts. The prevalences of short-term events, device loss, long-term corrections and secondary reconstructions, and reversion to autologous tissue techniques of 42 SSM-IIBRs performed after mantle field irradiation were compared to those of 47 salvage SSM-IIBRs following BCT. Both outcomes were compared to the outcome in the contralateral, non-irradiated breast of the subgroup of 23 women in the BCT group. The groups were comparable in terms of patient- and procedure-related risk factors, except for time lapse after previous therapy, intraoperative device weight, and the fraction of immediate use of a definitive implant. The outcome of SSM-IIBR after mantle field irradiation significantly differs favourably from that after BCT. It matches the outcome observed in non-irradiated breasts. Skin-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is a fully justifiable option for women who previously underwent mantle field irradiation for Hodgkin lymphoma. We feel that the unfavourable outcome observed in women who previously underwent BCT necessitates an alternative reconstructive modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:  Breast Cancer has now become the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. In a traditional radical mastectomy, there can be complications that may affect the physiological characteristics of the breast and subsequently cause profound psychological stress to the patients. Hence, latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction provides an aesthetic approach in patients undergoing mastectomy. The goal is to maximize the flap's soft tissue coverage while minimizing the magnitude of donor site defect and complication., Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, where 30 breast cancer patients were enrolled and had undergone mastectomy with immediate LD flap reconstruction. Cosmetic assessments using BREAST-Q questionnaires were conducted postoperatively at various intervals starting from postoperative day one, week two, and week six. The subjective evaluation was done by the patient, while a blinded nurse and surgeon did the objective assessment., Result:  The majority (n=23, 76.7%) were aged 31-50 years. Initial postoperative BREAST-Q scores declined but significantly improved by week six, attributed to gradual wound healing over time, resulting in improved breast shape and contour. The objective scoring done by the blinded surgeon and nurse improved at six weeks compared to two weeks postoperatively. Almost similar outcomes were observed between preoperative and six-week postoperative scores with a significant overall p-value of <0.001. No significant statistical differences were noted between blinded surgeons and nurses for objective scoring., Conclusion:  The rising trend of breast cancer in younger demographics emphasizes the importance of balancing cosmetic satisfaction with oncological outcomes. Immediate LD flap breast reconstruction provides a reliable means for soft tissue coverage with acceptable perioperative morbidities for patients undergoing mastectomy. Complication rates were acceptable, with donor site seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), and shoulder weakness among them. They could be prevented or treated (prolonged drain in situ, quilting sutures, and seroma aspiration) or resolved with time (SSI and shoulder function)., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) and Safdarjung Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee issued approval IEC/VMMC/SJH/Thesis/06/2022/CC-133. A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. Thirty patients were enrolled in the study who had a preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer and had undergone mastectomy with immediate LD Flap reconstruction in the elective setting. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Nyekha et al.)

There is a renewed interest for prepectoral reconstruction. We aimed to describe the feasibility and the early complications associated with immediate one-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction using prepectoral anatomical polyurethane (PU) foam-coated implants alone, for women with breast cancer or mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing surgery. We performed a single-center, retrospective review of 50 patients (mean age of 49 years), who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate prepectoral PU implant-based reconstruction. All procedures were performed by the same senior operator, from July 2018 to March 2020. A total of 64 mastectomies (25 SSMs and 39 NSMs) with one-stage prepectoral PU foam-coated implant reconstruction were performed. Out of 50 patients, 6 required surgical revision within 30 days, because of hematoma (2), wound dehiscence (2) infection (1), and full thickness nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis (1). Four patients developed a cutaneous rash with spontaneous resolution. Statistical analysis showed a significant influence of hypothyroidism and previous radiotherapy on the risk of complications. The association with prior radiotherapy (pRT) was not significant using binary logistic regression. When excluding oncological reasons and patient's wish for NAC excision, our decision to perform an NSM was influenced by breast cup size, preoperative measurements, and breast weight. Early experience with immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction with PU-covered implants alone suggests that it is a reliable procedure. Prior breast irradiation does not increase postoperative complication rates in our series. NAC preservation was decided according to preoperative lower breast measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundFew data are available on the risk factors of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in breast cancer. Herein, we evaluated the factors predicting LRR in a large series of patients who underwent either nipple- (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with IBR after NACT.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 609 breast cancer patients who underwent NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR between February 2010 and June 2017. Factors associated with an increased risk of LRR were analyzed by univariate (chi-square or Fisher’s exact test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard regression model) analyses.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 63 months, LRR as the first event occurred in 73 patients, and the 5-year cumulative LRR rate was 10.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed post-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10% [hazard ratio (HR), 2.208; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.295-3.765; P = 0.004], high tumor grade (HR, 1.738; 95% CI, 1.038-2.908; P = 0.035), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR, 1.725; 95% CI, 1.039-2.864; P = 0.035) as independently associated with increased LRR risk. The 10-year LRR rate was 8.5% for patients with none of the three associated risk factors, 11.6% with one factor, 25.1% with two factors, and 33.7% with all three factors (P < 0.001).ConclusionsPost-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10%, high tumor grade, and presence of LVI are independently associated with an increased risk of developing LRR after NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR. Future prospective trials are warranted to decrease the risk of LRR in patients with associated risk factors.

Immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy, is becoming increasingly popular, while the benefits are evident, the concern is in leaving breast tissue under the skin envelope, which could potentially lead to a higher chance of recurrence. We aim to determine the incidence and study the management of loco-regional recurrence (LR) of breast cancer following immediate autologous free flap reconstruction (AFFR) from a 10-year database at a single tertiary breast unit. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients who underwent AFFR between July 2008 and December 2018. All patients undergoing delayed reconstruction and risk-reducing surgery were excluded, leaving a total of 216 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significance in the prediction of LR. Management and outcome of the LR was also studied. LR was found in 7/216 cases (3.25%). The median age at surgery for patients with LR, was 45 (range 31–54). Median time to recurrence was 54 months (7–79 months). Three patients presented with self-detected lesions. In all, 6/7 patients were ER/PR positive, 2/7 were HER2 + at recurrence, and 1/7 was triple negative. All patients underwent surgical excision for the LR followed by radiotherapy, either chemotherapy (n-5) and/or hormone therapy (n-2). No patients have developed further LR. Because of low numbers of recurrences, no statistical significance was observed for factors causing recurrence. The low LR we report demonstrates that immediate AFFR is oncologically safe. Timely recognition through post-reconstruction patient education and appropriate management results in good outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few data are available on the risk factors of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in breast cancer. Herein, we evaluated the factors predicting LRR in a large series of patients who underwent either nipple- (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with IBR after NACT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 609 breast cancer patients who underwent NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR between February 2010 and June 2017. Factors associated with an increased risk of LRR were analyzed by univariate (chi-square or Fisher's exact test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard regression model) analyses. Results: During a median follow-up of 63 months, LRR as the first event occurred in 73 patients, and the 5-year cumulative LRR rate was 10.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed post-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10% [hazard ratio (HR), 2.208; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.295-3.765; P = 0.004], high tumor grade (HR, 1.738; 95% CI, 1.038-2.908; P = 0.035), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR, 1.725; 95% CI, 1.039-2.864; P = 0.035) as independently associated with increased LRR risk. The 10-year LRR rate was 8.5% for patients with none of the three associated risk factors, 11.6% with one factor, 25.1% with two factors, and 33.7% with all three factors (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Post-NACT Ki67 ≥ 10%, high tumor grade, and presence of LVI are independently associated with an increased risk of developing LRR after NACT and NSM/SSM with IBR. Future prospective trials are warranted to decrease the risk of LRR in patients with associated risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To evaluate 3‑year disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer who underwent radical subcutane­ous/skin-sparing mastectomy with simultaneous reconstruction.Patients and methods. The article analyzes 472 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent radical subcuta­neous/skin-sparing mastectomy in combined or complex treatment. In the Department of Oncology and reconstructive plastic surgery of the breast and skin radical skin mastectomy was performed in 255 (54.1%) and 217 (45.9%) patients with radical subcutaneous mastectomy. Reconstruction was carried out by autotissues, expanders, followed by replace­ment with endoprostheses, as well as a combination of flaps and endoprostheses. The mean age of patients was 43.8 ± 2.2 (18–73) years. In 32.3% of cases patients were in the age group up to 40 years.Results. In 9 (1,7 ± 0,6%) of patients diagnosed with a recurrence of breast cancer, herewith in 5 cases of local and in 4 cases of regional recurrence (metastases in the infraclavicular lymph nodes).Treatment of recurrences of breast cancer was as follows: in two cases polychemotherapy courses were conducted, in 6 cases operations were performed — excision of relapse in the breast (3) and subclavian lymphadenectomy (1), remov­al of the reconstructed gland (2), in 1 case — radiation therapy.In 13% relapses of breast cancer were diagnosed at stage III of breast cancer, the lowest percentage of relapse 0.7% at stage III. In luminal type A recurrence of breast cancer was diagnosed in 1.8%, in luminal B in 2.4%, in triple negative type — 2.5%, in luminal B Her2 positive — 2.7%. Metastases of breast cancer in our group of patients were diagnosed in 22 (4.7 ± 0.9%) patients. The highest percentage of long-term metastasis in our study revealed — 12.5% at stage III, the lowest percentage of 2.8 at stage I breast cancer. 3‑year overall survival of breast cancer patients in our group was 97.8% (n = 269).Conclusion. Radical subcutaneous/skin-sparing mastectomies with simultaneous reconstruction are radical in the onco­logical plan of treatment and improve the quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

Introduction. A skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy is a surgical treatment that is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. More often women themselves decide or even ask to undergo this type of surgery. In our paper, we present the issue of combined treatment of 62 patients after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy with a positive sentinel lymph node. Realisation of this type of surgery has further consequences in adjuvant treatment policies. Material and methods. The group of 62 previously untreated women with positive sentinel lymph nodes took part in this analysis. The individual plan of treatment was established for every patient by the multidisciplinary team according to the rules of the breast cancer unit. All patients were treated in the Holycross Cancer Centre in Kielce (in 2015–2018). Results. The early results show that proper qualification and realisation of oncological treatment is safe and effective. Severe complications appeared rarely. Conclusions. Skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy is a method of surgical treatment that is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. It should be remembered that the qualification for this type of procedure should be careful, and adjuvant treatment should be rationally planned. Our experience shows that it is an effective and safe method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer represents 10% of all cancers diagnosed worldwide annually and constitute 22% of all new cancers in women. The burden of breast cancer has increased steadily, almost doubling, in terms of estimated new cases annually over a 20-year span. Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the outcome on oncological standard and patient satisfaction on the aesthetic side with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for patients with early breast cancer. Patients and methods: this study included 80 female patients with breast cancer, 60 cases were operated upon at National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, 20 cases were operated upon at Oncosurgery Unit, Aswan University Hospitals, between 2015 and 2019. Results: In the current study, all patients were closely followed up to detect any signs of local recurrence (LR). The duration of postoperative follow up ranged from 24 to 48 months with a mean of 31.55 months. Only 1 patient (1.2 %) showed signs of local recurrence after 1 year of surgery. This condition was not associated with any sign of regional or systemic recurrence. This low incidence of local recurrence may be attributed to the early stage of the disease at the time of surgical intervention, the mastectomy procedure itself and the justified administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to the studied patients. However, a relatively short period of follow up might be a drawback of obtaining a solid conclusion. Conclusions: It could be concluded that skin sparing mastectomy and Immediate breast reconstruction is a technically feasible and oncologically safe procedure. Accepted cosmetic result was attained in most of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies evaluate oncological safety in complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery(C-OBCS) for DCIS. It still needs to be defined whether it is equivalent to standard breast conservation(S-BCS) or an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy(SSM). This study compares local recurrence rates(LR), disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the three surgical techniques. We conducted a retrospective register-based study on LR, DFS and OS of patients operated with S-BCS(n=1388), C-OBCS (n=106) or skin-sparing mastectomy (n=218) for DCIS diagnosed 2007–2020. Data was extracted from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry. In the S-BCS, C-OBCS and SSM groups, median age was 60, 58 and 51 years (p<0.001), median size 15, 25, and 40 mm (p<0.001) and median follow-up 55, 48 and 76 months. At ten years, the overall LR was 12.7%, 14.3% for S-BCS, 11.2% for C-OBCS and 6.8% for SSM. Overall DFS at ten years was 82.3%, 80.5% for S-BCS, 82.4% for C-OBCS and 90.4% for SSM. At ten years, the OS was 93.8%, 93.0% in S-BCS, 93.3% in C-OBCS and 96.6% in the SSM group. Weighted Kaplan Meier plots showed that SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS (p=0.003) and C-OBCS (p=0.029). DFS in C-OBCS versus S-BCS and the difference in OS was not significant (p=0.264). SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS and C-OBCS. The difference in DFS between S-BCS and C-OBCS, and OS between the three groups was not statistically significant. Our study suggests that C-OBCS is a safe alternative to S-BCS and SSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is increasingly used in patients with breast cancer. We compared the differences between use of electrocautery and LigaSure™ Small Jaw in patients with breast cancer who underwent SSM. Methods Between January 2012 and December 2015, 81 patients with breast cancer who underwent SSM were selected and were divided into the electrocautery group and the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group based on the devices that were used. Clinicopathological characteristics, body mass index, operative time, and weight of removed breast were obtained from medical records. Total amount and days of drain use, until removal, and postoperative skin necrosis, requiring debridement, were also analyzed. Results The study population consisted of 50 patients in the electrocautery group and 31 in the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group. The latter group has significantly shorter operative time (117.5 ± 16.9 vs. 104.0 ± 23.6 min, P = 0.004). The mean total volume of drainage was less (805 ± 278 vs. 694 ± 131 mL, P = 0.017) and mean duration of drainage was also significantly shorter in the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group (11.3 ± 2.5 vs. 10.1 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.029). Conclusions The use of LigaSure™ Small Jaw during skin-sparing mastectomy shortened the operative time and duration of drainage and reduced the total volume of drainage.

Introduction: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a common surgical procedure in breast cancer patients. Comparative analysis concerning the placement of implants is still lacking. Hence, we aimed to analyze pre- versus subpectoral IBR in breast cancer patients. Patients: A single-center experience with implant-based IBR following skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy was evaluated. Patient demographics, incidence of major complications, and quality of life assessed with BREAST-Q were compared between the pre- and subpectoral cohort. Results: A total of 63 patients were included in this analysis of whom 29 underwent subpectoral and 34 underwent prepectoral IBR. Median duration of surgery was prolonged in the subpectoral versus the prepectoral group (104 ± 28 vs. 80 ± 91 min; p < 0.05). The mean number of major complications was significantly increased in the subpectoral group (1.41 ± 1.76 vs. 0.47 ± 0.75 per patient; p < 0.05). Detailed analysis showed a significantly increased incidence of implant dislocation (p < 0.05) and a trend concerning capsular contracture (p = 0.086, not significant) and necrosis (p = 0.092, not significant) in the subpectoral group. Quality of life was equal in both groups. Conclusion: The mean number of major complications in the subpectoral group should be considered when IBR is indicated. Prepectoral IBR seems to be a feasible alternative surgical treatment option with less major complications in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: In order to achieve a complication-free breast reconstruction, it is fundamental for each individual patient case to determine preoperatively certain risk factors that might have a negative impact on the postoperative result after skin-sparing (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Methods: A retrospective study of 39 female breast cancer patients who received SSM or NSM breast reconstruction in our department (time interval: 2010–2015), was performed. The study focus is on determining patient characteristics (e.g., demographics, history of radiotherapy/chemotherapy, menopausal status, amount of resected breast tissue) leading to higher complication rates. Results: Overall, 50 mastectomies (27 SSM and 23 NSM) with 6 immediate and 35 immediate 2-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions amounting to a total of 41 surgical interventions (n = 41) were carried out. Median follow-up time was 2 years and 5 months (range 121–1,863 days). Increased complication rates were associated with the following patient characteristics: age >50 years (p < 0.05) and personal history of cardiovascular disease (p < 0.05). Increased but not significant risk factors included postmenopausal status (p = 0.07), radiotherapy prior to SSM/NSM (p = 0.06), and weight of resected breast tissue >438 g (p = 0.09). Conclusion: This work identified age >50 years and personal history of cardiovascular disease to be risk factors for increased complication rates following SSM and NSM. Therefore, the given findings should be taken into account when selecting patients for these 2 procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis represents a significant complication of breast reconstructive procedures and is reported to occur in 30%-52% of patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Early identification of ischemia and early initiation of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy can mitigate the effects of ischemia and rescue otherwise non-viable breast flap tissue. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of HBO2 therapy in eight breasts with compromised mastectomy skin flaps between September 2015 and January 2017. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) was used to assess perfusion intraoperatively and post-HBO2 administration. Results: Seven patients were referred for HBO2 within 24 hours of mastectomy. One patient failed to improve despite starting hyperbaric treatment within 24 hours. All other patients manifested successful healing of their mastectomy skin flaps with acceptable cosmesis after 10 HBO2 treatments. The mean relative perfusion of the at-risk area was 13.8% (±3.7%) pre-HBO2 and 101.6% (±37.3%) post-HBO2. The average area at-risk pre-HBO2 was 17.1 cm² and reduced to zero post-HBO2. Relative perfusion values after HBO2 were found to be 6.8 (±3.4) times greater than those measured prior to HBO2. Conclusions: A short course of HBO2 may be sufficient to successfully rescue at risk post-mastectomy breast flaps. ICGA is a useful adjunct for evaluating post-mastectomy breast flap perfusion before and after HBO2 therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Major surgical concerns associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are partial or total nipple-areola complex (NAC) loss, decreased sensation, and nipple malposition. Patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes including malposition in patients who have undergone unilateral expander-implant reconstruction after NSM as compared with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes of breast cancer patients who underwent spared or reconstructed NAC after unilateral NSM as compared with unilateral SSM.Methods: Patients who underwent immediate expander-implant breast reconstruction following unilateral NSM or SSM were included. Medical records of patients from April 2010 to February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Reconstruction-related complications such as infection, seroma, haematoma, delayed wound healing, and reconstruction failure were recorded. NAC outcome analysis was performed using preoperative and postoperative digital photographs for each patient. Patient satisfaction with the reconstructed breast and NAC was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire.Results: Delayed wound healing occurred in 18 of 55 NSM patients and 15 of 85 SSM patients (p = 0.040). Final reconstruction failure occurred in 0 NSM patients and 6 SSM patients (p = 0.043). The mean photography analysis score of total aesthetic outcome was 13.12 ± 2.39 in the NSM group and 14.06 ± 2.75 in the SSM group (p = 0.052). The mean questionnaire score of NAC position was 2.88 ± 0.85 in the NSM group and 3.80 ± 0.84 in the SSM group (p = 0.001). The mean questionnaire score of NAC sensitivity was 2.12 ± 0.58 in the NSM group and 1.84 ± 0.46 in the SSM group (p = 0.003). Satisfaction with the reconstructed breast was similar (p = 0.913) after NSM and SSM.Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in breast reconstruction satisfaction between the NSM and SSM groups. Although overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction is high, patients in the NSM group often report dissatisfaction with nipple position. With a favourable score for NAC position, skin-sparing mastectomy followed by NAC reconstruction can be considered as a balanced alternative to NSM for properly selected patients with breast cancer.Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Skin‐sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction is standard surgical treatment for early breast cancer with widespread ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The local recurrence rate after SSM is up to 7.0%. We investigated prediction of the pathological margin using contrast‐enhanced MRI, and evaluated the cut‐off point to obtain the safety margin. We performed SSM with immediate reconstruction in 216 early breast cancer patients with widespread DCIS and/or invasive cancer from January 2014 to December 2015. Forty cases were retrospectively reviewed after excluding those with >15 mm between skin and tumor, determined by preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI, or involving reconstructive surgery for local recurrence, immeasurable lesion by preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We defined a positive pathological margin as <1 mm from the cancer nest. We reviewed the distance between skin and tumor by MRI and pathological examination. To identify the cut‐off for predicting a positive pathological margin, we performed sensitivity analysis using an ROC curve. The margin‐positive rate by pathological examination was 27.5% (n = 11/40), with a moderate correlation of MRI margin and pathological margin (r = 0.44). The best cut‐off point for margin positivity was 5 mm of MRI margin, with sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.009). This is the first prediction of pathological margin by preoperative contrast‐enhanced MRI in early breast cancer patients with SSM. Care is required for SSM if the MRI margin is less than 5 mm due to pathological margin positivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]