Search

The article presents the author's comments on an article "Optimum Sample Size for a Problem in Choosing the Population With the Largest Mean," by statistician Paul N. Somerville, published in the June 1970 issue of "Journal of the American Statistical Association." In the article Somerville described a procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from normal populations with unknown means and a common known variance. The author claims that his procedure gives a unique minimax solution and that the minimax is a reasonable solution to the problem. According to the author, Somerville has not made it clear that his procedure gives only the local minimax solution. This makes practical applications of his procedure severely limited for it is difficult to think of a situation in which an experimenter would like to determine a local minimax value.

The article discusses moments of the distribution of sample size, N in a sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). The present paper provides variance, the third and the fourth moments of N. The details are worked out in five common applications of the SPRIT. The relation of the variance of N to the truncation of a SPRT is discussed is also discussed in the paper. Scholar A. Wald indicated in passing how one can obtain the moments of N, but the only published literature where the author encountered a general expression for the variance of N. However, their expression is incorrect. Using scholar J. Wolfowitz's results, which they do, or differentiating Wald's, fundamental identity twice one gets provided. In many practical applications of the SPRT, μ and moments in an equation derived are differentiable functions of a real-valued parameter. The limiting expressions for the moments can then be determined by standard methods of mathematical analysis. However, for the third and fourth moments the actual technique may involve an excessive amount of arithmetic.

Let X[sub 1], ... , X[sub m] and Y[sub 1], ... , Y[sub n] be independent random samples from populations having continuous d.f.'s psi((x-micro)/sigma) and psi((y-nu)/tau) respectively. The classical F-test of a hypothesis concerning angle = tau/sigma is known to be non-robust. This paper examines several robust alternative procedures and compares them on the basis of Pitman a.r.e and Monte Carlo studies of power functions. An approximate permutation test [13] and a "jackknife" procedure [9] are found to be most satisfactory; while a class of "rank-like" tests [10] are found to be "useful inefficient statistics" [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the results of a Monte Carlo study of the accuracy of an approximation to the power of the chi-square goodness of fit test with small but equal expected frequencies. Various combinations of sample size, number of groups, and alpha level are considered, and in most instances the actual power of the test is estimated to be less than the nominal power. The degree of accuracy appears to be more related to the size of the sample than to the size of the expected frequencies. The following rule of thumb is offered for obtaining crude estimates of the actual power from the nominal power for sample sizes from 10 to 50: The actual power of the test equals about eight-tenths of the nominal power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we examine how well the asymptotic null distribution of a two sample test due to Lehmann approximates the small sample distribution of the test, compare the validity of this Lehman test with the validity of the two sample t test under the null hypothesis of equal means, and compare the power of this Lehmannn test with the power of the t test. Our general conclusion is that experimenters will prefer to use the t test when the underlying distribution is the scale contaminated compound normal distribution and the sample sizes are less than thirty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper the first two moments of the ratio (treatment sum of squares)/(treatment sum of squares + error sum of squares)over all possible random assignment of treatments to the experimental plots, for a class of 2 associate PBIBD has been obtained. These two moments are compared with the corresponding moments of a continuous beta distribution to settle the question of approximating the randomization test by the usual F-test. It has been shown that a reasonable approximation to the randomization test based on the statistic F is equivalent to modifying the normal theory test by multiplying the numbers of d.f. of the F-distribution by a factor depending on the heterogeneity of the blocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]