1. Functional, Substantive, or Political? A Comment on Berger's "Second Thoughts on Defining Religion"
- Author
-
Weigert, Andrew J.
- Subjects
RELIGION ,SOCIOLOGISTS ,HUMANITIES ,PHENOMENOLOGICAL sociology ,SOCIOLOGY ,ACTION theory (Psychology) - Abstract
The article focuses on sociologist Peter L. Berger's definition of religion. In his stimulating article in the June 1974 issue of Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Berger presents an argument for reconsidering the kind of definition employed in the scientific study of religion. The major thread of his argument runs as follows. Concepts and definitions are tools fitted to the purposes of the investigator, like substantive or functional definitions of religion. Some use functional definitions for ideological purposes, that is to avoid specifically religious experience or to deny the transcendent. The scientific study of religion needs a reinvigorated substantive definition of religion from the phenomenological approaches of analysis of the numinous as religious experience and of model of multiple realities. The author agrees with Berger's approach while disagreeing with the impact of the total argument. The author holds that there are issues in the formation of concepts and definitions which are logically prior to the purposes of investigators.
- Published
- 1974
- Full Text
- View/download PDF