Notwithstanding frequent reports attesting to the value of homografting, there is still a reluctance to use the procedure freely and early enough to realize its fullest benefits. 11,14,18 This is partly due no doubt to the knowledge that the surface covering obtained is temporary, plus a belief that the procedure is too troublesome and elaborate to be practical. In our experience the ease of setting up on short notice a practical working scheme for homografting in surroundings that had never witnessed such a procedure before, the characteristically enthusiastic cooperation of the patient's friends and relatives who thereby gained a sense of participation in the task of getting the patient well and the immense sense of security given the surgeon by the possession of practically unlimited square inches of healthy skin in which to dress an extensively burned patient, make homografting seem to us a procedure of vast practical application and of particular common sense in the treatment of the acute extensive burn. There is no more desolate situation than to bring a major burn case successfully through the first forty-eight hours or so of burn shock, edema formation and resolution, then to be confronted with a vast denuded area demanding prompt skin coverage and to wonder from where the skin is going to come. Homografting, we think, supplies the answer. Despite firm conviction that early skin replacement is of paramount importance in the treatment of burns the tendency is strong and well nigh irresistible to wait weeks because of the poor condition of the patient, insufficient autogenous skin or a desire to be thrifty with what skin is left to the patient, and to use it only when a good take seems reasonably sure. All of these reasons for hesitancy spell delay, which may be fatal, and which can be circumvented by early recourse to homografting, a procedure which offers a generous supply of healthy skin at little or no physiologic expense to the patient and which can be undertaken to the great benefit of the sickest burn patient provided only that he be able to withstand the rigors of an extensive dressing. The authors would like to suggest that the nearest approximation to the ideal dressing for severely burned skin is a healthy split skin graft, autogenous or homologous. They would like, also, to suggest that the initial formal dressing of an extensively and deeply burned patient might well be a skin dressing of homografts procured from relatives or friends during the first two or three days of burn treatment and stored under sterile conditions of optimum refrigeration until needed, which is as soon as the patient's shock and edema fluctuations are controlled and corrected.