IT WAS with considerable pleasure that I accepted the invitation of your committee to present a paper before this Society, as one of a group along with those of my good friends, Drs. Hellman and Woodbury. Variance of opinion has existed among us, and I sincerely hope that our discussions here may result in a fuller coalescence of our views. The task assigned to me was to cover more particularly the mechanics of orthodontic practice. Obviously this could not be successfully done without some consideration of the various factors entering into the growth problem, with which, so far as is possible with our present knowledge, mechanical procedure must harmonize. So, in the title of this paper, I have used the word "biomechanics," a term suggested by Hellman some time ago. Notwithstanding the extensive research being done by a number of orthodontists, imbued with biological inclination, as well as by other students of biology, sufficient evidence has not yet been evolved to establish any definite knowledge concerning the etiology of malocclusion. The growth process in the human being is obscure; its study, undoubtedly, is very fascinating, and our specialty is fortunate in having so many of its own members who are capable of doing this type of work. Some day, as a result of their efforts, and the work of others who will follow them, the science of orthodontics may become established upon a sound biological basis, but in the meantime we must still face our problems in treatment, directed almost wholly by theories and clinical experience. For the workers in this field I have the greatest admiration; they are endeavoring, in our behalf and in the interests of humanity, to discover what is taking place in the growth process that would account for the malformation of the jaws and dental arches so common today. It is not my desire to be understood as decrying the efforts of these men, but the difficulty in arriving at definite conclusions concerning the etiology of malocclusion is partly responsible for the fact that we have no scientific basis from which to approach the problem of treatment, thus resulting in confusion. Greater progress might possibly result if those men with biological tendency would place a higher value upon knowledge gained through clinical experience, for from this source we have learned considerable. Dr. Arthur Thornton Taylor, of Sydney, Australia, recently visited a number of orthodontists throughout the world, as wen as several dental clinics in which orthodontics was practiced, and his impressions in "Scanning the Orthodontic Horizon'" give us some idea of the diverse views concerning the biological as well as the mechanical side of our specialty.