Search

Is the post-processing of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) forecasts necessary for issuing good photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts? Whenever this question is raised, the instinctive supposition always seems to be "yes," because GHI is the most important weather parameter governing the amount of PV power generated, and surely, the better the GHI forecasts are, the better the PV power forecasts should result. To attend to this question more scientifically and more formally, two classic deterministic-to-deterministic post-processing methods, namely, the model output statistics and kernel conditional density estimation, are applied at various stages of PV power forecasting, resulting in four distinct workflows. These different workflows are trained and tested on three PV plants in Hungary, using data from a four-year (2017–2020) period. Both ground-based GHI and satellite-retrieved GHI are used as the "truth" with which numerical weather prediction (NWP) GHI forecasts are post-processed. A very thorough deterministic forecast verification exercise is conducted following the best practices. It is found that contrary to the common supposition, post-processing GHI only leads to marginal, if that can be quantified at all, benefits, so long as the PV power forecasts are to be post-processed. This ought to be deemed as a very important finding, as it puts into question the "GHI forecasting + post-processing + irradiance-to-power conversion" workflow that has dominated solar forecasting for decades. • Post-processing is best performed on PV power instead of GHI • Model chains change the bias and variance of the input forecasts • Post-processing methods developed for GHI are transferable to PV power [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since directly measuring beam and diffuse irradiance is not feasible on many occasions, one often has to resort to estimating the beam and diffuse irradiance components from the global irradiance, which is known as separation modeling. Separation modeling is essentially a nonlinear regression problem, with the clearness index being the main input and the diffuse fraction being the output. Hundreds of separation models with various complexities have been proposed, among which the Yang4 model was recently validated using worldwide data as the quasi-universal choice for 1-min data. In this work, Yang4 is further improved by regime-dependent fitting, i.e., fitting a separate set of model coefficients for each climatological regime. Different regimes are determined through clustering of cloud cover frequency, aerosol optical depth, and surface albedo climatology maps. The new Yang5 model is able to outperform its predecessor at the 126 stations tested, covering a wide range of climate types. Overall, the normalized root mean square errors for beam normal irradiance (BNI) and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI) of Yang5 are 17.55% and 32.92% on average, as compared to 19.13% and 34.94% for the next best model, namely, Yang4. Furthermore, through conducting pairwise Diebold–Mariano tests, Yang5 is shown superior to Yang4 at 110/126 sites for BNI prediction and 93/126 for DHI. [Display omitted] • A concise summary of recent advances in separation modeling is given. • A regime-dependent version of the Yang4 model is proposed. • Regimes are defined by clustering cloud, aerosol, and albedo climatology. • The new Yang5 model outperforms the quasi-universal Yang4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A high-quality solar power forecasting system that strictly adheres to grid regulations is valuable for system operators to formulate strategies for power system scheduling. Some grid operators, therefore, enact penalty schemes for the forecasts submitted by photovoltaic (PV) plant owners, as a means to fortify truthful and high-quality forecast submissions. From the perspectives of both plant owners and grid operators, this study inquires into the quality-to-value mapping of solar forecasts in the context of power system day-ahead scheduling. A physics-based solar power forecasting method is presented, which consists of two steps. Firstly, ensemble numerical weather prediction (NWP) is summarized into point forecasts. Then irradiance is converted to power via a physical model chain. The results reveal that the two-step physics-based forecasting method has an advantage over a winning method in Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014 in terms of several accuracy measures. Subsequently, the economics of solar forecasting is quantified through performing day-ahead scheduling on a modified IEEE 30-bus system with PV and battery storage. It is demonstrated that, by respecting the statistical theory on consistency and elicitability when extracting point forecasts from NWP ensembles, both power system operators and PV plant owners can benefit profoundly in terms of cost savings. The former sees fewer needs for reserves, while the latter is less penalized. The data and Python code used to produce the results are also provided to enhance the reproducibility of this work. [Display omitted] • Solar power forecasts are integrated into a power system day-ahead scheduling framework. • The statistical theory on consistency and elicitability is used to summarize ensemble NWP. • Achieved 5% cost savings on power system reserve needs. • Achieved up to 82% cost savings on penalty of submitted forecasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]