Search

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is increasingly used in patients with refractory haematological malignancies but can induce severe adverse events. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after CAR-T therapy. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive adults admitted to either of two French ICUs in 2018–2022 within 3 months after CAR-T therapy. Results: Among 238 patients given CAR-T therapy, 84 (35.3%) required ICU admission and were included in the study, a median of 5 [0–7] days after CAR-T infusion. Median SOFA and SAPSII scores were 3 [2–6] and 39 [30–48], respectively. Criteria for cytokine release syndrome were met in 80/84 (95.2%) patients, including 18/80 (22.5%) with grade 3–4 toxicity. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 46/84 (54.8%) patients, including 29/46 (63%) with grade 3–4 toxicity. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was diagnosed in 15/84 (17.9%) patients. Tocilizumab was used in 73/84 (86.9%) patients, with a median of 2 [1–4] doses. Steroids were given to 55/84 (65.5%) patients, including 21/55 (38.2%) given high-dose pulse therapy. Overall, 23/84 (27.4%) patients had bacterial infections, 3/84 (3.6%) had fungal infections (1 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and 2 Mucorales), and 2 (2.4%) had cytomegalovirus infection. Vasopressors were required in 23/84 (27.4%), invasive mechanical ventilation in 12/84 (14.3%), and dialysis in 4/84 (4.8%) patients. Four patients died in the ICU (including 2 after ICU readmission, i.e., overall mortality was 4.8% of patients). One year after CAR-T therapy, 41/84 (48.9%) patients were alive and in complete remission, 14/84 (16.7%) were alive and in relapse, and 29/84 (34.5%) had died. These outcomes were similar to those of patients never admitted to the ICU. Conclusion: ICU admission is common after CAR-T therapy and is usually performed to manage specific toxicities. Our experience is encouraging, with low ICU mortality despite a high rate of grade 3–4 toxicities, and half of patients being alive and in complete remission at one year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory condition caused by an excessive immune response and cytokine overproduction. CRS is a life-threatening condition that is often associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Despite the increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), ICI-induced CRS remains rare. The present study describes a case of CRS that occurred after the administration of ICIs for recurrent adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A 49-year-old woman received paclitaxel, carboplatin and pembrolizumab for recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma. On day 27 of the third cycle, the patient was admitted with a fever and suspected pyelonephritis. The following day, hypotension, upper respiratory symptoms and myalgia of the extremities were noted, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased to 20%. Multiorgan failure (MOF) occurred, and the patient received ventilator support and continuous hemodiafiltration. Rhabdomyolysis, pancreatitis, erythema multiforme and enteritis were observed. CRS was diagnosed based on elevated ferritin and IL-6 levels. Steroid pulse therapy was administered; however, the MOF did not improve and the anti-IL-6-receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab (TOC) was administered. Subsequently, the LVEF improved to 50%, and the patient was removed from the ventilator on day 4 and from the continuous hemodiafiltration unit on day 6 after TOC administration. The patient was discharged on day 21. In conclusion, considering that ICI-induced CRS is a rare but severe complication, fever and other systemic conditions following ICI administration should be monitored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]