Search

Copyright of Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente is the property of Universidade Federal do Parana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Realidad Economica is the property of Realidad Economica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental & Social Management Journal / Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental is the property of Environmental & Social Management Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente is the property of Universidade Federal do Parana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental & Social Management Journal / Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental is the property of Environmental & Social Management Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Etnobiología is the property of Etnobiologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O objetivo deste artigo é caracterizar e diagnosticar o perfil socioeconômico da agricultura familiar do município de Parnaíba, Piauí, evidenciando a sua participação para o desenvolvimento de Parnaíba. A abordagem consistiu na análise de dados estatísticos obtidos do Censo Agropecuário Brasileiro de 2017, acessíveis por meio do Sistema de Recuperação Automática (SIDRA) do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), de acordo com a delimitação de indicadores para a caracterização dos estabelecimentos agropecuários, dos dirigentes das unidades familiares e da mão de obra ocupada. As informações obtidas foram tratadas a partir da estatística descritiva, analisadas e sistematizadas sob formas de tabelas e gráficos. Os resultados indicam que o segmento representa 37% das unidades agropecuárias do município, com predominância de minifúndios e carência de assistência técnica. Os dados mostram também que a categoria se destaca na produção de alimentos básicos, provendo o mercado interno e segurança alimentar das famílias agricultoras, contribui para o dinamismo econômico do município, movimentando mais de 15 milhões de reais em 2017 e emprega 30% da mão de obra rural de Parnaíba. Observa-se reduzida participação dos jovens no desenvolvimento das atividades produtivas, baixo acesso à instrução educacional e organizacional, demonstrando desafios no potencial produtivo, na manutenção e permanência da agricultura familiar. Abstract: The objective of this paper is to characterize and diagnose the socioeconomic profile of family farming in the municipality of Parnaíba, Piauí, highlighting its participation in the development of Parnaíba. The approach consisted of analyzing statistical data obtained from the 2017 Brazilian Agricultural Census, accessible through the Automatic Recovery System (SIDRA) of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), according to the delimitation of indicators for characterizing establishments agricultural workers, heads of family units and employed labor. The information obtained was treated using descriptive statistics, analyzed and systematized in the form of tables and graphs. The results indicate that the segment represents 37% of the municipality's agricultural units, with a predominance of smallholdings and a lack of technical assistance. The data also shows that the category stands out in the production of basic foods, providing the domestic market and food security for farming families, contributing to the economic dynamism of the municipality, generating more than 15 million reais in 2017 and employing 30% of the workforce. rural work in Parnaíba. There is reduced participation of young people in the development of productive activities, low access to educational and organizational instruction, demonstrating challenges in the productive potential and in the maintenance and permanence of family farming.

Copyright of Revista PAMPA is the property of Universidad Nacional del Litoral and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Agroecology encompasses various perspectives and trajectories – situated according to the particular social, cultural and ecological characteristics of each region –. The aim of this paper was to approach the hermeneutics of extension workers linked to Agroecology in Santiago del Estero between 2016 and 2017 with the purpose of contributing to the reflection of the practice and training in agroecology. We conducted an exploratory qualitative research from a critical interpretative approach through semi-structured interviews. We based our analysis on questions proposed by hermeneutics. Thus, we reconstructed What is there? What exists? What is being investigated for? How are problems transformed? What is known? How is knowledge (re)constructed? What is considered evidence? How is knowledge evaluated? Through these questions we recognise coherences, gaps and decouplings between discourses and practices. These contradictions are rather associated with institutionalized practices, involving tensions between individual-collective-institution. The extension staff showed a great diversity of perspectives and practices that we classified into three extension profiles linked to agroecology in Santiago del Estero: “Transferencist”, “Mediator” and “Emancipator”. The “transferencist” profile is the one we associate with the greatest number of contradictions and difficulties felt. The “emancipatory” profile is linked to a complex and multidimensional perspective, based on constructivist perspectives of defined knowledge, explicit utopias and epistemological pluralism based on an intersubjective dialogue for the strengthening of the network and collective identity. Furthermore, we identify the need to recognise the historicity of agroecology linked to rural extension and popular education within the umbrella of Latin American Environmental Thought. These results are useful for the individual and collective reflection of extension staff – and others – and as a reference for thinking about possible changes.