Search

The growing threat of global warming on coral reefs underscores the urgency of identifying heat‐tolerant corals and discovering their adaptation mechanisms to high temperatures. Corals growing in intertidal rock pools that vary markedly in daily temperature may have improved heat tolerance. In this study, heat stress experiments were performed on scleractinian coral Porites lutea from subtidal habitat and intertidal rock pool of Weizhou Island in the northern South China Sea. Thermotolerance differences in corals from the two habitats and their mechanisms were explored through phenotype, physiological indicators, ITS2, 16S rRNA, and RNA sequencing. At the extremely high temperature of 34°C, rock pool P. lutea had a stronger heat tolerance than those in the subtidal habitat. The strong antioxidant capacity of the coral host and its microbial partners was important in the resistance of rock pool corals to high temperatures. The host of rock pool corals at 34°C had stronger immune and apoptotic regulation, downregulated host metabolism and disease‐infection‐related pathways compared to the subtidal habitat. P. lutea, in this habitat, upregulated Cladocopium C15 (Symbiodiniaceae) photosynthetic efficiency and photoprotection, and significantly increased bacterial diversity and coral probiotics, including ABY1, Ruegeria, and Alteromonas. These findings indicate that rock pool corals can tolerate high temperatures through the integrated response of coral holobionts. These corals may be 'touchstones' for future warming. Our research provides new insights into the complex mechanisms by which corals resist global warming and the theoretical basis for coral reef ecosystem restoration and selection of stress‐resistant coral populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant differences in environmental conditions between nearshore and offshore coral reefs lead to different symbiotic zooxanthellae density (ZD) of corals. From the perspective of energy supply, different ZD lead to different energy provided by the photosynthesis of zooxanthellae to the coral host. However, few studies have conducted a comparative analysis of coral trophic status (i.e., autotrophic photosynthesis of zooxanthellae and heterotrophic feeding of the host) between nearshore and offshore reefs. In this study, 70 coral samples of Favia palauensis were collected from the nearshore Sanya reefs, and offshore Xisha, Nansha reefs in the South China Sea (SCS). The ZD, δ15N of seawater particulate organic matter (δ15NPOM), host tissue (δ15Nh), zooxanthellae (δ15Nz) and the difference between δ15Nh and δ15Nz (i.e., △h−z 15N = δ15Nh−δ15Nz) were measured and statistically analyzed. The purpose is to elucidate the differences in the energy maintenance mechanisms of corals between nearshore and offshore reefs. Results show that ZD is significantly positively correlated with δ15Nz in all three reefs (p < 0.05). Corals in nearshore Sanya have higher autotrophic abilities than corals from offshore Xisha and Nansha reefs. By contrast, corals in offshore reefs are more dependent on heterotrophic feeding of the host to obtain energy. Our research demonstrate that corals can adjust their trophic status, especially improve their heterotrophic feeding intensity to meet energy needs under different environmental conditions. This dynamic adjustment of energy supply patterns is of great significance to improve coral's environmental adaptability. Plain Language Summary: Coral reefs are mainly divided into nearshore fringing reefs, barrier reefs and offshore atolls according to geographical distribution. Therein, ambient seawater in nearshore reefs are significantly affected by human activities and has relatively higher nutrient levels. In contrast, corals in offshore atolls are less affected by human activities as they are far away from the mainland, but they will be potentially affected by abnormal natural conditions. Different environmental conditions lead to significant differences in the physiological parameters of corals, such as symbiotic zooxanthellae density (ZD). From the perspective of energy supply, different ZD may lead to different energy provided by the photosynthesis of zooxanthellae to the coral host. However, few studies have conducted a comparative analysis of coral trophic status between nearshore and offshore reefs. Based on the δ15N labeling technology, we find that corals in nearshore fringing reefs have higher autotrophic abilities than corals from offshore reefs. By contrast, corals in the offshore reefs are more dependent on heterotrophic feeding of the host to obtain energy. This means that corals can adjust their trophic status to meet energy needs under different environmental conditions. This dynamic adjustment of energy supply patterns is of great significance to improve coral's environmental adaptability. Key Points: The δ15N can record coral trophic status changes between nearshore and offshore reefsCorals in nearshore reefs have higher autotrophic photosynthesis and heterotrophic energy than corals in offshore reefsCoral can independently adjust trophic status under different environmental conditions between nearshore and offshore [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coral probiotics can improve the tolerance of corals to heat stress, thus mitigating the process of coral thermal bleaching. Sensitive and specific detection of coral probiotics at low abundances is highly desirable but remains challenging, especially for rapid and on-site detection of coral probiotics. Since the electrochemical biosensor has been recently used in the field of environmental DNA (eDNA) detection, herein, an efficient electrochemical biosensor was developed based on CoS 2 /CoSe 2 -NC HNCs electrode material with a specific DNA probe for the C. marina detection. After optimization, the lower limit of detection (LOD) values of such biosensors for the target DNA and genomic DNA were 1.58 fM and 6.5 pM, respectively. On this basis, a portable device was constructed for the practical detection of C. marina eDNA, and its reliability and accuracy were verified by comparison with the ddPCR method (P > 0.05). For each analysis, the average cost was only ∼ $1.08 and could be completed within 100 min with reliable sensitivity and specificity. Overall, the biosensor could reflect the protective effect of probiotics on coral heat stress, and the proposed technique will put new insights into the rapid and on-site detection of coral probiotics to assist corals against global warming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]