Search

Background: Patients with colon cancer may present at multiple different stages of the disease process. Many patients can be cured of colon cancer as a result of a simple surgical procedure usually performed by minimally invasive techniques. However, there are a variable number of patients, estimated at approximately 10%, who have a more advanced disease. If these patients are treated by the current conventional standard of care, the likelihood for treatment failure is extremely high. Methods: These are not patients with known disseminated disease but patients who are at high risk of recurrent disease unless special treatments are initiated preoperatively and intraoperatively. The identification of these patients is by (1) a high-quality CT scan, (2) tumor markers found preoperatively, (3) colonoscopic findings, and (4) symptoms. Results: Patients identified as being at high risk require special preoperative treatments which include neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Intraoperative chemotherapy with HIPEC should occur as part of the treatment if peritoneal metastases are documented by biopsy. In the operating room, a thorough exploration of all possible occult peritoneal spaces for metastatic disease needs to be performed. A modified cytoreductive surgical procedure along with a colon resection is performed in order to minimize sites of occult peritoneal metastases. This includes the greater omentum, ovaries, and tubes in postmenopausal women. Peritonectomy is used to create a shroud around the tumor so that all peritoneum that has been in direct contact with the tumor surface is resected and is used as a barrier against tumor cell dissemination in the process of colon cancer resection. If peritoneal metastases are visualized at any site, HIPEC should be included as part of the treatment package. Conclusions: I am convinced that patients at high risk of recurrence will have an improved outcome with proper preoperative evaluation, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and a revised intraoperative management strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For peritoneal metastases from a primary appendiceal mucinous neoplasm to exist, the thin wall of the appendix must perforate to allow mucus or mucus plus tumor cells to gain access to the peritoneal spaces. The proportion of specimens containing tumor cells within mucus as compared to mucus only outside the appendix may have prognostic significance. The histopathology of tumor masses was determined from the specimens resected at the cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The presence versus absence of tumor cells in mucus and the proportion of specimens with tumor cells was determined and correlated with the overall survival of these patients. In 418 patients with a complete cytoreduction for a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), the cellularity of all resected specimens was determined. The hazard ratio of overall survival of patients whose specimens had no cells as compared to specimens with cells in mucus by histology was 4.41 (1.61, 12.1) (p = 0.0039). If overall survival of patients with all specimens without tumor cells was compared to patients with specimens with 1–99 % tumor and compared to patients with 100 % of specimens with tumor cells, the hazard ratios were 4.3 (1.34, 13.8) (p = 0.0143) and 9.62 (2.93, 31.6) (p = 0.0002), respectively. The cellularity of mucus within the specimens removed by a complete CRS has strong prognostic implications in LAMN patients. LAMN with acellular specimens (LAMNa) as compared to LAMN with tumor cells in specimens (LAMNb) should be staged as different histologic subtypes of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]