Search

Background: This paper aims to instigate discussion and publication of methodologies applied to enhance quality management through comprehensive scientific reports. It provides a detailed description of the design, implementation, and results of the quality control program employed in the SMESH study. Methods: Cross-sectional, multicenter, national study designed to assess the prevalence of human papillomavirus in sex workers and in men who have sex with men (MSM). Respondent-driven sampling recruitment was used. An online system was developed for the study and checkpoints were defined for data entry. The system checked the quality of biological samples and performed a retest with part of the sample. Results: A total of 1.598 participants (442 sex workers and 1.156 MSM) were included. Fifty-four health professionals were trained for face-to-face data collection. The retest showed Kappa values ranging between 0.3030 and 0.7663. Conclusion: The retest data were mostly classified as indicating a strong association. The data generated by the checkpoints showed the successful implementation of the quality control program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliance on null hypothesis significance testing often leads to misinterpretation of research results. Common misinterpretations include that a statistically nonsignificant difference (p ≥ 0.05) implies no difference between groups, and that a statistically significant finding (p < 0.05) is unbiased and clinically important. We aimed to develop a tool — the Conclusion Generator — to mitigate these misconceptions. We reviewed the content of the Conclusion Generator and validated its output using published and simulated data. The Conclusion Generator is a free online application designed to generate conclusions for scientific papers based on the values and clinical interpretation of the point estimate and confidence interval. Both relative and absolute measures of effect are supported. It offers two modes for interpretation: (1) Statistical mode provides an accurate statistical interpretation of results, with an optional specification of superiority and noninferiority bounds; (2) Clinical mode evaluates the clinical importance of the point estimate and confidence limits as specified by the user. Both modes assume no uncontrolled biases. Users must specify the number of decimals, the direction of a beneficial effect (e.g. , relative risk <1 vs. >1), and the level of detail (concise vs. elaborated) for the output. The validation confirmed the Conclusion Generator's capability to interpret research results, considering random error and clinical relevance, while avoiding common misinterpretations associated with null hypothesis significance testing. The Conclusion Generator facilitates an appropriate interpretation of research results by emphasizing estimation and clinical relevance over hypothesis testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This paper aims to instigate discussion and publication of methodologies applied to enhance quality management through comprehensive scientific reports. It provides a detailed description of the design, implementation, and results of the quality control program employed in the SMESH study. Methods Cross-sectional, multicenter, national study designed to assess the prevalence of human papillomavirus in sex workers and in men who have sex with men (MSM). Respondent-driven sampling recruitment was used. An online system was developed for the study and checkpoints were defined for data entry. The system checked the quality of biological samples and performed a retest with part of the sample. Results A total of 1.598 participants (442 sex workers and 1.156 MSM) were included. Fifty-four health professionals were trained for face-to-face data collection. The retest showed Kappa values ranging between 0.3030 and 0.7663. Conclusion The retest data were mostly classified as indicating a strong association. The data generated by the checkpoints showed the successful implementation of the quality control program.