Search

Background: Left ventricular enlargement (LVE) is a common manifestation of cardiac remodeling that is closely associated with cardiac dysfunction, heart failure (HF), and arrhythmias. This study aimed to propose a machine learning (ML)-based strategy to identify LVE in HF patients by means of pulse wave signals. Method: We constructed two high-quality pulse wave datasets comprising a non-LVE group and an LVE group based on the 264 HF patients. Fourier series calculations were employed to determine if significant frequency differences existed between the two datasets, thereby ensuring their validity. Then, the ML-based identification was undertaken by means of classification and regression models: a weighted random forest model was employed for binary classification of the datasets, and a densely connected convolutional network was utilized to directly estimate the left ventricular diastolic diameter index (LVDdI) through regression. Finally, the accuracy of the two models was validated by comparing their results with clinical measurements, using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) to assess their capability for identifying LVE patients. Results: The classification model exhibited superior performance with an accuracy of 0.91 and an AUC-ROC of 0.93. The regression model achieved an accuracy of 0.88 and an AUC-ROC of 0.89, indicating that both models can quickly and accurately identify LVE in HF patients. Conclusion: The proposed ML methods are verified to achieve effective classification and regression with good performance for identifying LVE in HF patients based on pulse wave signals. This study thus demonstrates the feasibility and potential of the ML-based strategy for clinical practice while offering an effective and robust tool for diagnosing and intervening ventricular remodeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An increasing proportion of heart failure (HF) patients progress to the advanced stage (AdHF) with high event rates and limited treatment options. Echocardiography, particularly Speckle Tracking-derived myocardial work (MW), is useful for HF diagnosis and prognosis. We aimed to assess MW's feasibility in the prognostic stratification of AdHF. Methods: We retrospectively screened patients with AdHF who accessed our hospital in 2018–2022. We excluded subjects with inadequate acoustic windows; unavailable brachial artery cuff pressure at the time of the echocardiography; atrial fibrillation; and mitral or aortic regurgitation. We measured standard parameters and left ventricular (LV) strain (LS) and MW. The population was followed up to determine the composite outcomes of all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device implantation and heart transplantation (primary endpoint), as well as unplanned HF hospitalization (secondary endpoint). Results: We enrolled 138 patients, prevalently males (79.7%), with a median age of 58 years (IQR 50–62). AdHF etiology was predominantly non-ischemic (65.9%). Thirty-five patients developed a composite event during a median follow-up of 636 days (IQR 323–868). Diastolic function, pulmonary pressures, and LV GLS and LV MW indices were not associated with major events. Contrarily, for the secondary endpoint, the hazard ratio for each increase in global work index (GWI) by 50 mmHg% was 0.90 (p = 0.025) and for each increase in global constructive work (GCW) by 50 mmHg% was 0.90 (p = 0.022). Kaplan–Meier demonstrated better endpoint-free survival, with an LV GWI ≥ 369 mmHg%. Conclusions: GWI and GCW, with good feasibility, can help in the better characterization of patients with AdHF at higher risk of HF hospitalization and adverse events, identifying the need for closer follow-up or additional HF therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Surgically implanted Impella 5.5. delivers full cardiac support and left ventricular unloading for patients with heart failure. So far, the Impella device is implanted under general anesthesia (GA). Material and Methods A total of n = 3 critically ill patients presented with acute heart failure in need of cardiac support. All patients suffered cardiogenic shock of varying etiology. Due to hemodynamically unstable conditions, GA was avoided. All implantations were performed solely under local anesthesia (LAS) without any regional anesthesia. Results All implantations were performed successfully under LAS with 60 mL of mepivacaine of 2% solution and ropivacaine of 1% solution (50:50 ratio). All devices were placed from the right axillary artery. One patient needed hematoma evacuation several days after surgery. No other Impella-related complication was observed. Conclusion A surgical implantation of the Impella 5.5 device under LAS is feasible and safe. Despite the small number of cases, no disadvantage can be described at the present moment. Our series should encourage physicians to perform the procedure under LAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure patients without contraindications. However, limited donor availability and long wait times have created a need for left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) to be used as a bridge to transplantation in appropriately selected patients. Improvements in LVAD technology have resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes, further supporting the use of these devices for a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) indication. LVAD utilization as BTT exhibits notable disparities worldwide, mainly due to variations in organ availability, allocation policies, and financial constraints. Although Europe has experienced a consistent increase in the use of LVAD for this purpose, the United Network for Organ Sharing 2018 policy amendment resulted in a significant reduction in the number of LVADs used for BTT in the US. To overcome this issue, modifications in the US allocation policy to consider factors such as days on device support, age, and type of complications may be necessary to potentially increase implantation rates.The authors provide an overview comparing the current state of heart transplantation in the US and Europe, with a particular focus on how distinct allocation policies and organ availability impact medical practices. Additionally, the review will examine critical aspects ranging from patient selection and pre-implantation optimization to post-transplant outcomes. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Heart transplantation is the treatment of choice for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Because of donor organ shortages, there has been a growing interest in alternative strategies, in particular mechanical circulatory support, not only as a bridge to transplantation but also as a destination therapy (DT). • In Poland, the implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is still registered as a bridge to transplantation, a bridge to candidacy, but has yet to be registered as a DT. The outcomes, however, force the decisive institutions to proceed with the registration of LVAD implantation as a DT next year. • Although these mechanical circulatory support devices, especially third-generation full magnetic pumps, have significantly improved survival rates and quality of life, the evolution of LVADs is challenging. One such formidable complication that continues to pose a significant clinical dilemma is driveline infection. Although drivelines are crucial in maintaining device functionality, they also serve as potential entry points for pathogens, leading to infections that can seriously affect patients. • Patients receiving LVADs as DT are often immunocompromised due to advanced age, comorbidities like diabetes, or the use of specific medications. This compromised immune status increases susceptibility to infections involving driveline infections. The most important complication of driveline infection is the development of bloodstream infection. • Optimal surgical techniques and early implementation of targeted antibiotics are crucial. In our cohort, the most frequent pathogen revealed in wound swab culture was Staphylococcus aureus (MSS) methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus (n = 23; 44%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 9; 17%), which was in line with the research from other centers worldwide. Donor organ shortages cause increasing demand for mechanical circulatory support in patients with end-stage heart failure not only as a bridge to heart transplantation but mainly as a destination therapy. Improved results and increased applicability and durability of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have established this treatment option as an alternative to heart transplantation in selected patients. One of the most common complications after LVAD implantation is driveline infections (DLIs). This study aimed to expand the understanding of DLI epidemiology and potential changes in implantation techniques regarding optimizing DLI prevention and treatment among all patients undergoing LVAD (Medtronic's Heartware HVAD and HeartMate 3 Abbott LVAD system) implantation with at least 12 months of follow-up time between 2015 and 2022. There were 120 individuals with LVAD implantation, of whom 90 had 12 months of follow-up (85 men [94%], 5 women [6%]) with a median age of 58 years (50.25-63.75). The median body mass index was 27.12 kg/m2 (25.27-29.68). Of the 90 patients, 43 had ischemic heart failure (48%), 43 had dilated cardiomyopathy (48%), and the remaining 3 had other etiologies (3%), such as postinflammatory, and the remaining 1 had congenital heart defect (1%). Preoperative echocardiography revealed a mean left ventricle ejection fraction of 13.8% and a median left ventricle dimension of 7.55 cm (6.92-8.2). Imaging confirmed pulmonary hypertension in 61 patients (68%). Thirty-four of the 90 patients had diabetes (38%), and 16 were active smokers (18%). Median follow-up was 30 months (17.25-42), with the longest period being 82 months. More than half of the patients (n = 52; 57%) experienced a DLI. The median time to the first episode of DLI was 13 months (6-25). The most common pathogen revealed in wound swab culture was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 23; 44%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 9; 17%), Proteus mirabilis (n = 4; 7%), and others. We observed that deeper driveline implantation below the left rectus muscle and just above the posterior rectus sheath resulted in fewer DLIs and longer free-from-DLI follow-up time. There was no statistically significant difference in DLI frequency between patients with or without diabetes mellitus. Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of destination therapy. DLI is the most common complication after LVAD implantation. Optimal surgical techniques and early implementation of targeted antibiotics are crucial. Significant challenges remain in optimizing DLI prevention and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Heart transplantation is still the treatment of choice for selected patients with end-stage heart failure, but the availability of heart transplantation is insufficient. Even significant scientific progress and numerous innovations within the field of mechanical circulatory support cannot solve the two persistent problems of cardiac transplantation: a continuously increasing number of heart failure patients worldwide and a continuous decrease in donor organs suitable for transplantation. • Destination therapy provides long-term circulatory support, and patients can experience prolonged survival and improved functional status. Successful outcomes are closely tied to careful patient selection and individualized care. Comprehensive pre-implant evaluation, including assessment of comorbidities, psychosocial factors, and nutritional status, helps identify suitable candidates for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. • Anemia after LVAD implantation is a recognized complication that requires careful monitoring and management. In the early postoperative period, bleeding is the most frequent cause of anemia. Gastrointestinal bleeding otherwise is a common complication in LVAD recipients in follow-up observation and can be a significant cause of anemia. • Renal failure after LVAD implantation also represents a multifaceted and challenging complication that demands careful consideration. Consequently, alterations in hemodynamics and perfusion resulting from LVAD placement may exert profound effects on renal function. Heart transplantation is the treatment of choice for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Persistent donor organ shortage causes a growing demand for mechanical circulatory support not only as a bridge to transplantation but mainly as a destination therapy (DT). The aim of the study was to analyze the indications, comorbidities, and complications during the follow-up of all patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with at least 12 months of follow-up time in one of the most experienced clinics in Poland between 2015 and 2023. There were 125 individuals with LVAD implantation, from which 90 had full 12 months of follow-up (85 males – 94%, 5 females – 6%), with a median age of 58 (50.25-63.75) years. The median body mass index was 27.12 (25.27-29.68). The etiology of heart failure was ischemic (n = 44, 49%), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 44, 49%), and others. Preoperative echocardiography revealed a mean LV ejection fraction of 13.8% and a median LV dimension of 7.55 (6.92-8.2) cm. In 61 patients (68%), imaging confirmed pulmonary hypertension. Thirty-four patients (38%) had diabetes and 16 (18%) were active smokers. Median follow-up was 30 (17.25-42) months, with the longest period being about 82 months. 40 (44%) patients had kidney failure before LVAD implantation, and in 43 cases (48%), we observed relevant, transient deterioration of kidney function. Almost all patients (n = 82, 91%) suffered from anemia (Hb <13 g/dL in males and <12 g/dL in females) in different periods after LVAD implantation due to perioperative bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding or unknown causes. The lowest Hb level was observed in the first week after LVAD implantation in 53 cases (58%). Median red cell concentrate transfusion demand before the discharge after surgery was 6 (2-8, 5) units. Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Anemia and kidney failure are the most frequent follow-up complications. Improved results and increased applicability and durability of LVADs have established this treatment option as an excellent alternative for patients with end-stage heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Left ventricular assist device (L‐VAD) implantation is increasingly used in patients with heart failure (HF) and most patients also have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Limited data are available on the incidence of ICD therapies and complications in this special setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the real‐world incidence and predictors of ICD therapies, complications and interactions between ICD and L‐VAD. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in patients with advanced HF implanted with ICD and a continuous‐flow L‐VAD, followed‐up in five advanced HF centers in Northern Italy. Results: A total of 234 patients (89.7% male, median age 59, 48.3% with ischemic etiology) were enrolled. After a median follow‐up of 21 months, 66 patients (28.2%) experienced an appropriate ICD therapy, 22 patients (9.4%) an inappropriate ICD therapy, and 17 patients (7.3%) suffered from an interaction between ICD and L‐VAD. The composite outcome of all ICD‐related complications was reported in 41 patients (17.5%), and 121 (51.7%) experienced an L‐VAD‐related complication. At multivariable analysis, an active ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone and a prior ICD generator replacement were independent predictors of ICD therapies and of total ICD‐related complications, respectively. Conclusions: Real‐world patients with both L‐VAD and ICD experience a high rate of ICD therapies and complications. Our findings suggest the importance of tailoring device programming in order to minimize the incidence of unnecessary ICD therapies, thus sparing the need for ICD generator replacement, a procedure associated to a high risk of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has evolved into an established therapy for patients with chronic heart failure and a wide QRS complex. Data on long-term outcomes over time are scarce and the criteria for implantation remain a subject of investigation. Methods: An international, multicenter, retrospective registry includes 2275 patients who received CRT between 30 November 2000 and 31 December 2019, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.7 years. Four time periods were defined, based on landmark trials and guidelines. The combined endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. Results: The composite endpoint occurred in 656 patients (29.2%). The mean annual implantation rate tripled from 31.5 ± 17.4/year in the first period to 107.4 ± 62.4/year in the last period. In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for the composite endpoint was not statistically different between time periods. When compared to sinus rhythm with left bundle branch block (LBBB), a non-LBBB conduction pattern (sinus rhythm: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.12–2.03; atrial fibrillation: HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.30–3.33) and a QRS duration below 130 ms (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.29–2.09) were associated with a higher hazard ratio. Conclusions: Despite innovations, an adjusted regression analysis revealed stable overall survival over time, which can at least partially be explained by a shift in patient characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Carotid baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) restores baroreflex sensitivity and modulates the imbalance in cardiac autonomic function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We tested the hypothesis that treatment with BAT significantly reduces cardiovascular mortality and heart failure morbidity and provides long‐term safety and sustainable symptomatic improvement. Methods and results: BeAT‐HF was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, two‐arm, parallel‐group, open‐label, non‐implanted control trial. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III subjects, ejection fraction ≤35%, previous heart failure hospitalization or N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) >400 pg/ml, no class I indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy and NT‐proBNP <1600 pg/ml were randomized to BAT plus optimal medical management (BAT group) or optimal medical management alone (control). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality and HF morbidity; additional pre‐specified endpoints included durability of safety, quality of life (QOL), exercise capacity (6‐min hall walk distance [6MHWD]), functional status (NYHA class), hierarchical composite win ratio, freedom from all‐cause death, left ventricular assists device (LVAD) implantation, heart transplant. Overall, 323 patients had 332 primary events, median follow‐up was 3.6 years/patient. Both primary endpoint (rate ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–1.57; p = 0.82) and components of the primary endpoints were not significantly different between BAT and control. The system‐ and procedure‐related major adverse neurological and cardiovascular event‐free rate remained 97% throughout the trial. Symptom improvement (QOL, 6MHWD, NYHA class, all nominal p < 0.001) in the BAT group was durable in time, sustainable in extent. Win ratio (1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.58) and freedom from all‐cause death, LVAD implantation, heart transplant (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.43–1.01) favoured the BAT group but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The BeAT‐HF primary endpoint was neutral; however, BAT provided safe, effective, and sustainable improvements in HFrEF patient's functional status, 6MHWD and QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy in end-stage heart failure patients is frequently complicated by the emergence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). These arrhythmias have been implicated in precipitating deleterious clinical outcomes, increased mortality rates and augmented healthcare expenditures. Case Presentation: We present a challenging case of a 49-year-old male with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy who received an LVAD. Post-implantation, the patient suffered from intractable VAs, leading to multiple rehospitalizations and hemodynamic deterioration. Despite exhaustive medical management and electrical cardioversion attempts, the patient's VAs persisted, ultimately necessitating prioritization for cardiac transplantation. Discussion: This case highlights the challenges in managing VAs in LVAD patients and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration. While pharmacological intervention is the initial strategy, catheter ablation may be considered in selected cases when medication is insufficient. In instances of intractable VAs, expeditious listing for heart transplantation as a high-priority candidate is advisable when feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of end-stage heart failure and patients who could benefit from heart transplantation requires an expansion of the donor pool, relying on the transplant community to continually re-evaluate and expand the use of extended criteria donor organs. Introduction of new technologies such as the Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System aids in this shift. We seek to analyze the impact of the SherpaPak system on recipient outcomes who receive extended criteria organs in the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry. Between October 2015 and December 2022, 1,113 adults from 15 US centers receiving donor hearts utilizing either SherpaPak (n = 560) or conventional ice storage (ice, n = 453) were analyzed from the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry using summary statistics. A previously published set of criteria was used to identify extended criteria donors, which included 193 SherpaPak and 137 ice. There were a few baseline differences among recipients in the 2 cohorts; most notably, IMPACT scores, distance traveled, and total ischemic time were significantly greater in SherpaPak, and significantly more donor hearts in the SherpaPak cohort had >4 hours total ischemia time. Posttransplant mechanical circulatory support utilization (SherpaPak 22.3% vs ice 35.0%, p = 0.012) and new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/ventricular assist device (SherpaPak 7.8% vs ice 15.3%, p = 0.033) was significantly reduced, and the rate of severe primary graft dysfunction (SherpaPak 6.2% vs ice 13.9%, p = 0.022) was significantly reduced by over 50% in hearts preserved using SherpaPak. One-year survival between cohorts was similar (SherpaPak 92.9% vs ice 89.6%, p = 0.27). This subgroup analysis demonstrates that SherpaPak can be safely used to utilize extended criteria donors with low severe PGD rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality and seems to be responsible for approximately 50% of heart failure cases and hospitalizations worldwide. First-line treatments of patients with HFrEF, according to the ESC and AHA guidelines, include β-blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This quadruple therapy should be initiated during hospital stay and uptitrated to maximum doses within 6 weeks after discharge according to large multicenter controlled trials. Quadruple therapy improves survival by approximately 8 years for a 55-year-old heart failure patient. Additional therapeutic strategies targeting other signaling pathways such as ivabradine, digoxin, and isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine combination for African Americans, as well as adjunctive symptomatic therapies, seem to be necessary in the management of HFrEF. Although second-line medications have not achieved improvements in mortality, they seem to decrease heart failure hospitalizations. There are novel medical therapies including vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil, genetic and cellular therapies, and mitochondria-targeted therapies. Moreover, mitraclip for significant mitral valve regurgitation, ablation in specific atrial fibrillation cases, omecamtiv mecarbil are options under evaluation in clinical trials. Finally, the HeartMate 3 magnetically levitated centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has extended 5-year survival for stage D HF patients who are candidates for an LVAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The deleterious consequences of chronically elevated venous pressure in patients with profound right ventricular or biventricular dysfunction are well known, including renal and hepatic dysfunction, and volume overload. The only option for these patients, if they fail optimal medical treatment, is a heart transplant, as they are not candidates for left ventricular assist device therapy. Mean perfusion pressure (MPP) is important in the outcomes of critically ill patients with high venous pressure. The question arises whether MPP is important for the outcomes of heart transplants in patients with elevated pre-transplant venous pressure. Medical management of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction involves lowering the systemic afterload with vasodilators while awaiting a transplant. We hypothesised that when venous pressure is elevated prior to transplant, a substantial reduction in systemic arterial elastance (E a) through vasodilation may significantly decrease MPP, resulting in compromised end-organ function and consequent unfavourable outcomes after heart transplantation. This study aims to investigate whether a low MPP serves as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in heart transplant recipients with high venous pressure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 heart transplant recipients undergoing isolated heart transplantation at a single institution from October 2012 to March 2020. Right atrial pressure (RAP) of more than 15 mmHg was considered high. Additionally, E a calculated as the ratio of end-systolic pressure to stroke volume, and MPP calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure and RAP were considered in our analysis. The outcomes of transplantation were measured in terms of 90-day mortality and survival up to 7 years. High RAP was a significant risk factor for short-term and medium-term survival if E a was low (<2.7 mmHg/mL, the median value). This group had 39.39% in-hospital mortality compared to 14.49% for RAP<15 mmHg (p∼0.005). When E a was high, this difference in survival was not evident: 8% for RAP<15 mmHg vs 4.8% for RAP>15 mmHg (p∼0.550). This effect was mediated through a lower MPP, and the mortality due to lower MPP increased strikingly with higher body surface area (BSA). A negative correlation was observed between MPP indexed to BSA (MPPI) and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (r∼-0.3580, p<0.0001) as well as creatinine (r∼-0.3551, p<0.0001). MPPI less than 40 mmHg/m2 was associated with poorer short-term (23.2% for MPPI<40 mmHg/m2 vs 7.1% for MPPI>40 mmHg/m2, p∼0.001) and medium-term survival. The impact of high RAP and low E a on survival was evident even on medium-term follow-up; only 30% survival at 7 years follow-up for high RAP and low E a vs 75% for RAP<15 mmHg (p∼0.0033). The acceptable blood pressure during vasodilator therapy in patients with high RAP needs to be higher, especially in those with higher BSA. MPPI less than 40 mmHg/m2 is a risk factor for survival, in the short and medium-term, after heart transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure, a common clinical syndrome caused by functional and structural abnormalities of the heart, affects 64 million people worldwide. Long-term mechanical circulatory support can offer lifesaving treatment for end-stage systolic heart failure patients. However, this treatment is not without complications. This review covers the major complications associated with implantable mechanical circulatory support devices, including strokes, pump thrombosis and gastrointestinal bleeding. These complications were assessed in patients implanted with the following devices: Novacor, HeartMate XVE, CardioWest, Jarvik 2000, HeartMate II, EVAHEART, Incor, VentrAssist, HVAD and HeartMate 3. Complication rates vary among devices and remain despite the introduction of more advanced technology, highlighting the importance of device design and flow patterns. Beyond clinical implications, the cost of complications was explored, highlighting the difference in costs and the need for equitable healthcare, especially with the expected rise in the use of mechanical circulatory support. Future directions include continued improvement through advancements in design and technology to reduce blood stagnation and mitigate high levels of shear stress. Ultimately, these alterations can reduce complications and enhance cost-effectiveness, enhancing both the survival and quality of life for patients receiving mechanical circulatory support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKTx) and combined heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) remain the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure with concomitant end-stage renal or lung failure. We sought to study trends and outcomes of HKTx and HLTx over the last two decades. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify all adult patients (aged >18 y) who underwent HKTx and HLTx between 2001 and 2021. Patients were divided into 5-y groups by the year of transplantation (2001-2006, 2007-2011, 2012-2016, and 2017-2021). Primary outcome was 1-y posttransplantation mortality. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival analyses, respectively. A total of 2301 HKTx and 567 HLTx patients were included. Between 2001 and 2021, HKTx volume increased from 25 to 344 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HKTx increased from 19 to 76 (P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HKTx improved from 86.7% in 2001-2006 to 89.0% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.005). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.62 (0.39-1.00, P = 0.048) compared with that for 2001-2006. Between 2001 and 2021, HLTx volume increased from 21 to 43 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HLTx increased from 12 to 20 (P = 0.047). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HLTx improved from 68.9% in 2001-2006 to 83.9% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.600). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.37 (0.21-0.67, P = 0.001) compared with that for 2001-2006. Over the last two decades, HKTx volume substantially increased and HLTx experienced resurgent growth. One-year survival persistently improved for both procedures, especially over the past 5 y. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in the management of chronic heart failure in patients with a broad or paced QRS. However, data on long‐term outcome after upgrade to CRT are scarce. Methods and results: This international, multicentre retrospective registry included 2275 patients who underwent a de novo or upgrade CRT implantation with a mean follow‐up of 3.6 ± 2.7 years. The primary composite endpoint included all‐cause mortality, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device implantation. The secondary endpoint was first heart failure admission. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were performed. Patients who underwent CRT upgrade (n = 605, 26.6%) were less likely female (19.7% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.001), more often had ischeemic cardiomyopathy (49.8% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001), and had worse renal function (median estimated glomerular filtration rate 50.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 [35.8–69.5] vs. 59.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 [43.0–76.5], p < 0.001). The incidence rate of the composite endpoint was 10.8%/year after CRT upgrade versus 7.1%/year for de novo implantations (p < 0.001). PSM for the primary endpoint resulted in 488 pairs. After propensity score matching, upgrade to CRT was associated with a higher chance to reach the composite endpoint (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.70), for both upgrade from pacemaker (multivariable HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03–1.70) and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) (multivariable HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01–1.95). PSM for the secondary endpoint resulted in 277 pairs. After PSM, upgrade to CRT was associated with a higher chance for heart failure admission (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.26–2.41). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, the outcome of patients who underwent upgrades to CRT differed significantly from patients who underwent de novo CRT implantation, particularly for upgrades from ICD. Importantly, this difference in outcome does not imply a causal relation between therapy and outcome but rather a difference between two different patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to evaluate whether baseline GLS (global longitudinal strain), NT-proBNP, and changes in these after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can predict long-term clinical outcomes and the echocardiographic-based response to CRT (defined by 15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume). Methods: We enrolled 143 patients with stable ischemic heart failure (HF) undergoing CRT-D implantation. NT-proBNP and echocardiography were obtained before and 6 months after. The patients were followed up (median: 58 months) for HF-related deaths and/or HF hospitalizations (primary endpoint) or HF-related deaths (secondary endpoint). Results: A total of 84 patients achieved the primary and 53 the secondary endpoint, while 104 patients were considered CRT responders and 39 non-responders. At baseline, event-free patients had higher absolute GLS values (p < 0.001) and lower NT-proBNP serum levels (p < 0001) than those achieving the primary endpoint. A similar pattern was observed in favor of CRT responders vs. non-responders. On Cox regression analysis, baseline absolute GLS value (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51–1.91; p = 0.002) was beneficially associated with lower primary endpoint incidence, while baseline NT-proBNP levels (HR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.43–2.01; p = 0.002) and diabetes presence (HR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12–1.98; p = 0.003) were related to higher primary endpoint incidence. Conclusions: In HF patients undergoing CRT-D, baseline GLS and NT-proBNP concentrations may serve as prognostic factors, while they may predict the echocardiographic-based response to CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Right heart failure (RHF) is associated with poor outcomes, especially in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of RHF after LVAD implantation. Of 129 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11 years, 89% male) undergoing LVAD implantation, 34 developed RHF. Compared to patients without RHF, those with RHF required longer invasive mechanical ventilation and had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (p < 0.01). One-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with versus without RHF after LVAD implantation (29.4% vs. 1.2%; hazard ratio 35.4; 95% confidence interval 4.5–277; p < 0.001). Mortality was highest in patients with delayed RHF after initial LVAD-only implantation (66.7%). Patients who did versus did not develop RHF had significantly higher baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; 404 ± 375 vs. 234 ± 162 dyn/s/cm5; p = 0.01). PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 was a significant predictor of survival in patients with RHF after LVAD implantation. These data confirm the negative impact of RHF on morbidity and mortality after LVAD implantation. Preoperative PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 determined using invasive right heart catheterization was an independent predictor of developing RHF after LVAD implantation, and of subsequent mortality, and could be used for risk stratification in the setting for deciding between single or biventricular support strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Risk stratification in heart failure (HF) is essential for clinical and therapeutic management. The Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score is a validated prognostic model for assessing cardiovascular risk in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). From the validation of the score, the prevalence of HF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as edoxaban, for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has been increasing in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients treated with edoxaban for NVAF. Materials and Methods: This study included consecutive outpatients with HF and NVAF treated with edoxaban (n = 83) who underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). They were matched by propensity score with a retrospective group of HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) from the MECKI score registry (n = 844). The study endpoint was the risk of cardiovascular mortality, urgent heart transplantation, or Left Ventricle Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. Results: Edoxaban patients were treated with a more optimized HF therapy and had different clinical characteristics, with a similar MECKI score. After propensity score, 77 patients treated with edoxaban were successfully matched with the MECKI-VKA control cohort. In both groups, MECKI accurately predicted the composite endpoint with similar area under the curves (AUC = 0.757 vs. 0.829 in the MECKI-VKA vs. edoxaban-treated group, respectively, p = 0.452). The two populations' survival appeared non-significantly different at the 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: this study confirms the prognostic accuracy of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with edoxaban, showing improved predictive power compared to VKA-treated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent the final treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) not eligible for transplantation. Although LVAD design has been further improved in the last decade, their use is associated with different complications. Specifically, inflammation, fibrosis, bleeding events, right ventricular failure, and aortic valve regurgitation may occur. In addition, reverse remodeling is associated with substantial cellular and molecular changes of the failing myocardium during LVAD support with positive effects on patients' health. All these processes also lead to the identification of biomarkers identifying LVAD patients as having an augmented risk of developing associated adverse events, thus highlighting the possibility of identifying new therapeutic targets. Additionally, it has been reported that LVAD complications could cause or exacerbate a state of malnutrition, suggesting that, with an adjustment in nutrition, the general health of these patients could be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are surgically implanted mechanical support devices utilized with increasing frequency as a bridge to myocardial recovery, destination therapy, and heart transplantation. While the use of such devices in patients with advanced heart failure has shown significant survival benefits and improved quality of life, they bear their own risks and complications.1 Bleeding, infection, pump thrombosis, and stroke are just some of the serious complications associated with LVADs.2 LVAD-associated pseudoaneurysms are rare, with prior reports of occurrence at the left ventricular apex and at the anastomosis site of the outflow graft to the ascending aorta.3,4 Typically, this device-related complication requires surgical repair and, if at all feasible, heart transplantation. However, in cases of difficult anatomy, unfavorable position, and significant comorbidities, surgery may be contraindicated due to high surgical risk. This case portrays a patient suffering from a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after HeartMateIII implantation that was not amenable to surgical repair due to heightened surgical risk. We document the first pseudoaneurysm associated with the HeartMate-III in available literature and describe a novel management strategy of documented nonoperative course of LVAD-associated pseudoaneurysm, with the patient surviving 56+ months with medical optimization and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the potential use of interatrial shunt therapy as a treatment for heart failure (HF). Interatrial shunting involves creating a pathway for blood flow from the high-pressure left atrium to the low-pressure right atrium, which can reduce left-sided filling pressures and improve symptoms and exercise capacity in HF patients. Several interatrial shunt devices have been developed and tested, with varying results. The article presents the results of a study testing the V-Wave Ventura interatrial shunt device in HF patients, which showed positive outcomes in terms of safety, shunt patency, quality of life, and functional health status. However, the study has limitations, and further research is needed to determine the ideal patient population and the long-term effects of interatrial shunting as a treatment for HF. [Extracted from the article]

This article discusses the outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure. The study compares the outcomes of de novo CRT patients (those who receive CRT as their initial treatment) to upgrade CRT patients (those who have previously received a conventional pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator and have a higher proportion of right ventricular pacing). The study found that upgrade CRT patients had a higher risk of mortality compared to de novo CRT patients, even after adjusting for various factors. However, another similar study found different results, indicating that the differences in outcomes may be due to the characteristics of the patient population. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment for upgrade CRT patients. [Extracted from the article]

A paper electrochemical immunosensor for the combined binding and quantification of the heart failure (HF) biomarker Galectin-3 has been developed. The simple design of the new sensor is comprised of paper material that is decorated with gold nanostructures, to maximize its electroactive surface area, and functionalized with target-specific recognition molecules to selectively bind the protein from aqueous solutions. The binding of the protein caused the blockage of the electron flow to the sensor electroactive surface, thus causing its oxidation potential to shift and the corresponding current to reduce quantitatively with the increase in the protein concentration within the working range of 0.5ng/mL-8ng/mL (LOQ-0.5 ng/mL). This novel sensor was able to quantify Galectin-3 concentration in saliva samples from HF patients and healthy controls within 20 min with good reproducibility (RSD = 3.64%), without the need for complex sample processing steps. The electrochemical measurements of the patient samples were cross validated by ELISA where the percent agreement between the two methods was found to be 92.7% (RSD = 7.20%). Therefore, the new paper immunosensor sensor has a strong potential for rapid and cost-effective screening of the Galectin 3 biomarker at points of care, thus supporting the timely diagnosis of heart failure. [Display omitted] • A paper electrochemical immunosensor for Galectin-3. • Non-invasive and early and rapid detection of heart damage using human saliva. • The electrochemical measurements agreed with ELISA measurements. • The has strong potential for the detection of the biomarker at points of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) have become a crucial therapy for patients with advanced heart failure awaiting heart transplantation or as destination therapy. However, the possibility of LVAD explantation, once considered rare, is increasingly recognized as a complex and evolving aspect of advanced heart failure management. LVAD explantation may be considered in specific clinical scenarios, including myocardial recovery, heart transplantation candidacy, or resolution of adverse events such as infection or device-related complications. Successful LVAD explantation often necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, including close collaboration between cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and transplant teams. However, the decision to explant an LVAD is complex and involves careful patient evaluation, including functional assessment, cardiac imaging, and hemodynamic monitoring. Challenges may arise in identifying suitable candidates, assessing myocardial recovery, and managing potential complications associated with explantation. This abstract explores the various scenarios, indications, and challenges associated with potential LVAD explantation. Case report: We present a 56-year-old female patient who has been under medical supervision since 2015 due to dilated cardiomyopathy. In the same year, she underwent pre-transplantation assessment and received an LVAD implant. She has been hospitalized on multiple occasions for microcytic anemia, attributed to uterine fibroids, for which she underwent an elective hysterectomy. In March 2020, she was hospitalized due to a local infection and bleeding around the driveline entry site. Furthermore, in July 2021, she was admitted due to increased fatigue, accompanied by exertional palpitations and lower leg swelling. The patient reported a fall at home but provided a detailed account of the incident, without any loss of consciousness. She also mentioned that she had not experienced similar incidents before. The LVAD device functioned normally without any recorded alarms. A medical consensus determined that the patient would remain on the Eurotransplant waiting list until further notice. The patient received regular follow-up care through the Daily Cardiology Clinic. In July 2023, she was hospitalized for a disease reevaluation. During hospitalization, the LVAD pump speed and flow were gradually reduced with a favorable myocardial response. Furthermore, in September of this year, she was admitted for planned right heart catheterization and evaluation for LVAD explantation. However, the right heart catheterization was not performed for technical reasons, and there were no new issues compared to her previous hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]