Search

A triple system is cancellative if it does not contain three distinct sets A , B , C such that the symmetric difference of A and B is contained in C. We show that every cancellative triple system H that satisfies a particular inequality between the sizes of H and its shadow must be structurally close to the balanced blowup of some Steiner triple system. Our result contains a stability theorem for cancellative triple systems due to Keevash and Mubayi as a special case. It also implies that the boundary of the feasible region of cancellative triple systems has infinitely many local maxima, thus giving the first example showing this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A celebrated theorem of Pippenger, and Frankl and Rödl states that every almost‐regular, uniform hypergraph H$\mathcal {H}$ with small maximum codegree has an almost‐perfect matching. We extend this result by obtaining a conflict‐free matching, where conflicts are encoded via a collection C$\mathcal {C}$ of subsets C⊆E(H)$C\subseteq E(\mathcal {H})$. We say that a matching M⊆E(H)$\mathcal {M}\subseteq E(\mathcal {H})$ is conflict‐free if M$\mathcal {M}$ does not contain an element of C$\mathcal {C}$ as a subset. Under natural assumptions on C$\mathcal {C}$, we prove that H$\mathcal {H}$ has a conflict‐free, almost‐perfect matching. This has many applications, one of which yields new asymptotic results for so‐called 'high‐girth' Steiner systems. Our main tool is a random greedy algorithm which we call the 'conflict‐free matching process'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider edge decompositions of K v (3) − I , the complete 3-uniform hypergraph of order v minus a set of v / 3 mutually disjoint edges (1-factor). We prove that a decomposition into tight 6-cycles exists if and only if v ≡ 0 , 3 , 6 (mod 12) and v ≥ 6 ; and a decomposition into tight 9-cycles exists for all v ≥ 9 divisible by 3. These results are complementary to the theorems of Akin et al. [Discrete Math. 345 (2022)] and Bunge et al. [Australas. J. Combin. 80 (2021)] who settled the case of K v (3). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]