Search

Different laser damage testing protocols, including 1-on-1, S-on-1, and Raster Scan, were conducted on 532 nm polarizers to evaluate the damage resistance and mechanisms. A comparison of the laser-induced damage thresholds (LIDTs) revealed different damage characteristics and major contributions to film failure for different polarizations. For P polarization, the LIDTs for the three test protocols were nearly the same because of the stabilization of two typical damage morphologies of flat-bottomed pits and mussel damage pits. For S polarization, the LIDTs for multiple pulses were lowest, where absorptive defect-induced damage was revealed. The damage characteristics of 532 nm polarizers and 1064 nm polarizers have been also compared. The mussel damage pits, which are similar to the typical damage morphologies of ultraviolet (UV) laser damage to fused silica, were observed for the first time in coatings of 532 nm polarizers. This suggests that, the polishing-induced subsurface damage of fused silica substrates may tend to be excited by a short-wavelength laser rather than the fundamental wavelength. • The damage resistance and damage characteristics of 532 nm polarizers in different laser damage test protocols, including 1-on-1, S-on-1, and Raster Scan, have been summarized, as a reference for thin-film optics in high-power laser applications. • The damage characteristics of 532 nm polarizers and 1064 nm polarizers were compared. The subsurface damage of fused silica substrates is easily excited by short-wavelength lasers. • Mussel pits, associated with the ultraviolet laser damage of fused silica, were observed in the coatings for the first time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]