Search

Global grassland degradation has prompted professionals and practitioners to critically consider about the future of grassland resources. Restoration actions related to payment for ecosystem services (PES) have been proposed as a possible approach to balancing grassland sustainable development and ecosystem service supply. Since 2005, approximately one billion U.S. dollars have been invested in the Three-River Headwater Region (TRHR) of China to restore 5.69 × 106 ha of degraded grasslands via grassland cultivation and fencing. Unfortunately, few literature has drawn valid and generalizable conclusions regarding the economic performance of these PES programs. Therefore, field data from multiple sites were collected to evaluate the economic returns of restoration actions, returns on investments (ROI), and trade-offs among ecosystem services of cultivated and fenced grasslands over different restoration years in the TRHR. The results revealed that PES-related restoration efforts in the TRHR had yielded a net profit of $14.34 billion, with $13.20 billion from the alpine meadow, $0.74 billion from the alpine steppe and $0.40 billion from the temperate steppe. These substantial economic can be attributed to the combined effects of the surge in specific ecosystem services and the synergistic improvement of all ecosystem services. The ROI of supporting service accounted for the largest proportion of ROI in total ecosystem services and exhibited drastic fluctuations with restoration years, whereas the ROI of other services either increased gradually or remained stable across different restoration periods. The trade-offs in ecosystem services varied greatly with grassland type. We observed an increasing synchronization of ecosystem services over time in the fenced alpine steppe, cultivated alpine meadow, and cultivated temperate steppe; whereas a similar trend was not detected in other grasslands. Our research underscores the importance of incorporating herders' willingness, assessing restoration performance of grasslands and adopting more targeted and adaptive restoration actions in subsequent PES programs. • PES helped balance sustainable development and ecosystem conservation. • Multiple site data was collected to explore ecological returns of restoration actions. • Restoration actions with PES programs had yielded a net profit of $14.34 billion. • Gains were owed to surge of specific ecosystem services and synergy of all services. • Herders' willingness and more targeted actions should be considered in next steps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How climate change and human activities drive the evolution of the regional environment and where the quality of ecosystems improve or decline over time have become widespread concerns. In this study, we took the Three-River-Source (TRS) region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau as a case, aiming to identify and quantify the contribution of the natural and anthropogenic factors to the ecosystem changes over the past years from 1980 to 2018 using the methods of remote sensing and spatial statistical analysis. Based on the land cover map interpreted by reference to satellite remote sensing imagery data, we defined the Ecological Restoration Area Proportion (ERAP) as the bare land patch decrement to indicate the ecologically restored quantity in space. Assembling the restoration project information, we digitalized and vectorized the ecological Restoration Intensity (RI) including the spatial range and temporal duration. Combining the ERAP and the net primary productivity (NPP), which indicates the quantity and quality of ecosystems, respectively, the ecological asset Index (EAI) was developed and calculated. Having integrated the datasets of the vegetation monitoring, climatic factors, geographical factors, and human activities, we performed multi-variable analysis of the attribution of how the change in the EAI, the NPP, and the EAI have been affected by these factors together. The NPP of the middle and eastern parts of the TRS region has improved the most, as the average growth rate of NPP reached approximately 2.5 kg C/m2/10a. Due to such dynamic pattern, we found that human-induced re-vegetation has made limited contributions in our multi-regression model as the variance explained by the RI merely amounts to 4.4% to 8.8%, while the changes were mostly dependent on the regional temperature and the precipitation which contributed over 45% to the ecological restoration on average. It was summarized that "climate-help" overwhelms "human act" in such alpine grassland ecosystem. The regression results for the different aspects of the ERAP and NPP demonstrated that the ecological restoration project helped most in regard to ecosystem quality improvement rather than the restored ecosystem quantity. Our study has developed a comprehensive assessment methodology that can be reused to account for more ecological asset. The case is an example of an alpine ecosystem in which the success of ecological restoration needs favorable climatic conditions as supporting evidence for the nature-based solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]