Search

Background: The management of congenital scoliosis poses a significant challenge for treating surgeons. The aim of our study was to provide insight into the long-term clinical results of spinal fusion in congenital scoliosis., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the scoliosis database in our institution for the period 1976 until 2002 identifying 43 patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion. Patient demographics, diagnosis, levels fused, and radiographs were evaluated. Patients were evaluated for unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) via SRS 22, EQ5D-5L, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)., Results: Of the 43 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 22 patients agreed to participate, 3 patients were known to be deceased and 18 patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and were excluded. The mean age of the respondents was 40.7 years (range, 30 to 47 y) with a mean follow-up from index surgery of 35 years (range, 20 to 44 y). At most recent follow-up, 12 patients (54%) underwent UPROR. The mean age at diagnosis was 3.4 years (range, birth to 11.5 y), and the mean age for first surgery was 5.8 years (range, 1 to 13 y). As regards radiologic follow-up; the mean number of levels fused was 5.2 (range, 2 to 12). Thoracic fusion was performed in 17 patients (77%). The mean T1 to T12 height at index surgery and maturity was 166 mm (range, 130 to 240 mm) and 202 mm (range, 125 to 270 mm), respectively. The mean functional scores at follow-up were SRS 22: 4.5 (range, 2.4 to 5), cumulative EQ5D-5L score 7.2 (range, 5 to 15), and ODI: 8% (range, 2 to 30%). All respondents completed high school, 10 patients (45%) completed university, and 2 patients were awarded doctorates. Currently, 17 patients (77%) are in paid employment., Conclusions: This report constitutes the largest series of patients treated by spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis followed into maturity. We demonstrate the thorax continues to grow after index fusion, patient-reported outcomes were satisfactory with superior educational and employment rates and unplanned return to theatre is rare in adult life., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Compared to Immediate-Release (IR) metformin, Extended-Release (ER) metformin reduces side effects and pill burden while improving adherence; however, there is little real-life data on patient satisfaction with this innovative formulation to guide physicians toward a more holistic approach., Objective: Our goal is to train general practitioners on holistic patient management, with the aim of increasing patient satisfaction and treatment adherence, reducing side effects, and improving quality of life in patients with poor tolerance to metformin-IR., Materials and Methods: We designed an educational program for physicians called SlowDiab, aimed at establishing a holistic patient approach. In this context, adult patients with T2DM who experienced gastrointestinal discomfort with metformin-IR were enrolled and switched to metformin- ER. Data on glycemic control were collected at baseline and 2 months after switching. A survey was carried out on patients to assess their level of satisfaction., Results: In 69 enrolled patients (mean (min-max) age, 68.2 (41-90)), side effects decreased after switching from 61.8% to 16.2% (p < 0.01), and the mean perceived burden of adverse events on a scale of 1 to 10 also decreased (6.17 vs. 3.82; p < 0.05). Among patients previously intolerant to metformin-IR, 74.3% reported no longer experiencing any side effects after the switch. The mean number of tablets taken daily (2.28 vs. 1.66; p < 0.01) and mean plasma glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values (7.0% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.05) decreased, while 93.8% of patients were satisfied with the treatment change. Moreover, 84.2% reported an improvement in glycemic control after the switch., Conclusion: In a real-life setting, an educational program for general practitioners confirmed that metformin ER reduces side effects and improves pill burden, therapeutic adherence, and patient satisfaction compared to metformin IR., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) aim to control curve progression while limiting surgical burden in children with early-onset scoliosis. Systemic and local distribution of metal debris has been documented in children with spinal implants. The aim of the study was to assess serum metal ion levels and local metal debris-related changes at the conclusion of MCGR treatment., Methods: Between February 2019 and September 2022, all patients who had a conversion to definitive fusion at the completion of MCGR treatment in our institution were invited to participate in this study. Consenting patients had serum metal ion levels drawn (titanium, cobalt, and chromium) and histologic analyses of peri-implant tissue samples., Results: We enrolled 24 children who underwent definitive fusion post-MCGR treatment for early-onset scoliosis. The average age at definitive fusion was 13.3 years (range: 11 to 17 y). The average length of MCGR treatment was 4.8 years (range: 1.5 to 6.8 y). At the end of the MCGR treatment, 23 (96%) patients had elevated serum metal ion levels. Mean serum titanium levels were 165.4 nmol/L (range: 30 to 390 nmol/L), mean serum cobalt levels were 4.6 nmol/L (range: 1.2 to 14 nmol/L), and mean serum chromium levels were 14 nmol/L (range: 2.4 to 30 nmol/L). Peri-implant soft tissue histologic analysis demonstrated local metal debris and foreign body reactions in all patients., Conclusions: At the completion of MCGR treatment, the majority of patients demonstrate elevated serum metal ion levels and local metal debris-related peri-implant soft tissue changes. Although there is no current literature to suggest these findings are harmful, further research as to the clinical significance is required., Level of Evidence: Level IV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)