Search

Anti‐HER2 therapy is indicated for erb‐b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2)‐amplified/overexpressing endometrial carcinoma (EC). Mutations constitute another mode of ERBB2 activation, but only rare ERBB2‐mutated ECs have been reported. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic and genetic features of ERBB2‐mutated EC. From an institutional cohort of 2638 ECs subjected to clinical tumor‐normal panel sequencing, 69 (2.6%) with pathogenic ERBB2 mutation(s) were identified, of which 11 were also ERBB2‐amplified. The most frequent ERBB2 hotspot mutations were V842I (38%) and R678Q (25%). ERBB2 mutations were clonal in 87% of evaluable cases. Immunohistochemistry revealed low HER2 protein expression in most ERBB2‐mutated ECs (0/1+ in 66%, 2+ in 27%); all 3+ tumors (7.3%) were also ERBB2‐amplified. Compared to ERBB2‐wildtype ECs (with or without ERBB2 amplification), ERBB2‐mutated/non‐amplified ECs were enriched for the microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H) and, to a lesser extent, DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit (POLE) molecular subtypes, and associated with high tumor mutational burden and low chromosomal instability. Survival outcomes were similar between patients with ERBB2‐mutated/non‐amplified versus wildtype EC, whereas ERBB2 amplification was associated with worse prognosis on univariate, but not multivariate, analyses. In conclusion, ERBB2 mutation defines a rare subgroup of ECs that is pathogenically distinct from ERBB2‐wildtype and ERBB2‐amplified ECs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether urinary diversion procedures performed at time of pelvic exenteration affect quality of life in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies., Methods: We performed a retrospective secondary longitudinal analysis of quality of life according to type of urinary diversion patients received. Participants completed a series of validated questionnaires at various time points. We allocated patients based on urinary diversion type to either the continent group (CD; 29 [55 %]) or noncontinent group (NCD; 24 [45 %])., Results: We noted a significant improvement in global health scores from baseline over time (time p = 0.027). Physical functioning scores showed a statistically significant difference over time (at 24 months: NCD, -4.3 [95 % CI, -14.1 to 5.4]; CD, 0.4 [95 % CI, -7.1 to 7.9]. p < 0.001). Social functioning scores were persistently higher for the CD vs NCD group at all time points but did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline (p = 0.75) or over time within the same group (time p = 0.122). Body image scores significantly decreased (reduced burden) over time for both groups (p = 0.044) and were consistently higher in the NCD vs CD group., Conclusions: Patients experienced a return to their baseline quality of life within a year of surgery. Clinicians should prioritize and improve identifying and discussing postoperative challenges such as changes in physical and social functioning and body image., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Abu-Rustum reported grants or contracts paid to the institution from GRAIL. Dr. Leitao Jr. reported ad-hoc speaker fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; and advisory board participation for Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon and Immunogen. Dr. Bochner reported consulting fees from Olympus. Dr. Carter reported grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation; consulting fees from Sprout; and speaker fees from MedCo. Dr. Chi reported speaker fees from AstraZeneca; advisory board participation for Verthermia Acquio and Biom ‘Up; and stock ownership for Doximity and BioNTech SE. No other disclosures were reported., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To assess clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of patients with endometrial carcinoma involving adnexal, full-thickness serosal, or combined involvement., Methods: This international, multi-institutional, retrospective study examined patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIA endometrial cancer and tumors involving the uterine serosa and/or adnexa, who were surgically staged between 2000 and 2019. Patients with sarcoma histology, concurrent endometrial/ovarian malignancy, neoadjuvant treatment, positive lymph nodes, or peritoneal disease were excluded., Results: Of 185 patients identified, 139 had tumors with adnexal-only, 40 with serosal-only, and six with combined adnexal/serosal involvement. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 23-89). Among tumors of endometrioid histology, 12 (48%) with serosal-only and 17 (19%) with adnexal-only involvement were FIGO grade 3 (p=0.007). Twenty-three tumors with serosal-only (64%) and 50 with adnexal-only (37%) involvement had lymphovascular invasion (p=0.004). Non-endometrioid histology was present in five tumors (83%) with combined adnexal/serosal, 15 (38%) with serosal-only, and 50 (36%) with adnexal-only involvement.Median follow-up was 77 months (range 0.6-254). Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates for all patients with stage IIIA disease were 73.8% (SE 3.5%) and 81.0% (SE 3.1%), respectively. For patients with adnexal-only, serosal-only, and combined adnexal/serosal involvement, 5-year progression-free survival rates were 80% (SE 3.8%), 61% (SE 8.3%), and 33% (SE 19.2%), respectively (p<0.01); 5-year overall survival rates were 85% (SE 3.3%), 70% (SE 7.8%), and 60% (SE 21.9%), respectively (p=0.09). On univariate analysis, tumors having serosal involvement with/without adnexal involvement, non-endometrioid histology, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with progression. On multivariate analysis, tumors having serosal involvement with/without adnexal involvement remained significantly associated with recurrence (adjusted HR=2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.3; p=0.01)., Conclusions: Patients with 2009 FIGO stage IIIA endometrial cancer have distinct survival outcomes depending upon adnexal and/or serosal involvement. Progression-free survival was worse for patients with serosal involvement after adjusting for histology, adjuvant treatment, and lymphovascular space invasion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ML reports personal fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, J&J/Ethicon, and Immunogen. NRA-R reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. AGE reports speaker fees from Intuitive Surgical and AstraZeneca. DZ reports institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Merck, Plexxikon, Synthekine, and Genentech; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Synthekine, Astellas, Tessa Therapeutics, Memgen, Celldex, Crown Biosciences, Hookipa Biotech, Kalivir, Xencor, and GSK; royalties from Merck; and stock options from Accurius Therapeutics, ImmunOS Therapeutics, and Calidi Biotherapeutics, all outside the submitted work. The other authors do not have potential conflicts of interest to declare., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system includes lymphovascular invasion quantification as a staging criterion for endometrioid endometrial carcinomas; no lymphovascular invasion and focal invasion (≤4 vessels involved) are grouped as one category, and substantial invasion as another., Objective: To assess the association between lymphovascular invasion and oncologic outcomes., Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with FIGO 2009 stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer treated surgically with total hysterectomy and lymph node assessment at two tertiary care centers between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Lymphovascular space invasion was categorized as focal (<5 vessels involved), substantial (≥5 vessels involved), and no lymphovascular invasion using WHO criteria., Results: Of 1555 patients included, 65 (4.2%) had substantial, 119 (7.7%) had focal, and 1371 (88.2%) had no lymphovascular invasion. Median age was 64 years (range 24-92). Thirty-five patients (53.8%) with substantial, 44 (37%) with focal, and 115 (8.4%) with no lymphovascular invasion had stage IB disease (p<0.001); 21 (32.3%) with substantial, 24 (20.2%) with focal, and 91 (6.6%) with no lymphovascular invasion had grade 3 disease (p<0.001). Thirty-six patients (55.4%) with substantial, 80 (67.2%) with focal, and 207 (15.1%) with no lymphovascular invasion received adjuvant treatment (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 61.5 months (range 0.8-133.9). Five-year progression-free survival rates were 68.7% (substantial), 70.5% (focal), and 90.7% (no invasion) (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, any lymphovascular invasion was associated with increased risk of progression/death (adjusted HR (aHR)=1.84 (95% CI 1.73 to 1.96) for focal; 2.17 (95% CI 1.96 to 2.39) for substantial). Compared with focal, substantial lymphovascular invasion was associated with an aHR for disease progression of 1.18 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.39)., Conclusions: Focal and substantial lymphovascular invasion were associated with increased risk of disease progression and do not appear to be prognostically distinct. Focal versus no lymphovascular invasion have different prognostic outcomes and should not be combined into one category., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AGE reports speakers fee from Intuitive Surgical and GSK. BD is a speaker and consultant for MSD. NRA-R reports research funding from GRAIL paid to the institution. ML reports personal fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, J&J/Ethicon, and Immunogen. VM is supported (all funding to institution)/unpaid consultancy/advisory board membership from AstraZeneca, Clovis, Duality, Eisai, Faeth, Genentech, GSK, Immunocore, iTEOS, Kartos, Karyopharm, Moreo, Morphosys, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, and Zymeworks. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To examine the risk of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in apparent uterine-confined endometrial cancer (EC) using molecular classification with clinicopathologic features and assess oncologic outcomes by molecular subtypes with micro- or macro-metastases in SLN., Methods: Patients undergoing surgical staging for presumed uterine-confined EC of any histology, with successful bilateral SLN mapping were included. Primary tumors were assigned molecular subtypes using a published algorithm. SLN pathology was categorized as negative, isolated tumor cells (ITCs), or micro- or macro-metastases., Results: Overall, 756 patients were included; 80 (10 %) had micro- or macro-metastases and 51 (7 %) had ITCs. On multivariate multinomial logistic regression, risk of micro- or macro-metastases versus negative SLN was higher for ECs with copy number-high (CN-H)/TP53abn (OR 3.1; 95 % CI 1.3-7), lymphovascular space invasion ([LVSI]; OR 8.0; 95 % CI 4-16), and deep myoinvasion (≥50 %; OR 3.33; 95 % CI 1.9-6.04). Three-year PFS rates by subtype for 68 patients with macro-metastases were 38 % (95 % CI 10-67 %) CN-low/no specific molecular subtype (CN-L/NSMP), 66 % (95 % CI 44-82 %) microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), and 23 % (95 % CI 10-40 %) CN-H/TP53abn (p = 0.006). Three-year OS rates were 55 % (95 % CI 20-80 %) CN-L/NSMP, 83 % (95 % CI 61-93 %) MSI-H, and 55 % (95 % CI 34-71 %) CN-H/TP53abn (p = 0.048)., Conclusions: Integrating molecular subtype with uterine risk factors (LVSI and myoinvasion) further stratifies risk of occult SLN metastases in patients undergoing surgical staging for early-stage EC. No molecular subgroup had exceedingly low SLN metastases detected, supporting continued universal SLN assessment. Patients with macro-metastases and CN-L/NSMP or CN-H/TP53abn EC had worse outcomes than those with MSI-H EC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Weigelt reports funding by REPARE Therapeutics, and employment of an immediate family member at AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Momeni-Boroujeni reports consulting work at Scorpion Therapeutics. Dr. Leitao reports personal fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, J&J/Ethicon, and Immunogen. Dr. Abu-Rustum reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. The other authors do not have potential conflicts of interest to declare. Funding Research reported in this publication was supported in part by a Cancer Center Support Grant of the NIH/NCI (Grant No. P30CA008748). B. Weigelt is funded in part by Cycle for Survival and Breast Cancer Research Foundation grants. C. Dagher was supported in part by the Bobst Foundation., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) has different molecular subtypes associated with varied prognosis. We sought to characterize the molecular features of ECs with POLE hotspot mutations and concurrent mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency/high microsatellite instability (MSI)., Methods: We identified POLE-mutated (POLEmut), MMR-deficient (MMRd)/MSI-high (MSI-H), or combined POLEmut/MMRd ECs subjected to clinical tumor-normal panel sequencing between 2014 and 2023. Clonality of somatic mutations, MSI scoring, tumor mutational burden (TMB), proportion of somatic insertions and deletions (indels), and single base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures were extracted., Results: We identified 41 ECs harboring POLE exonuclease domain hotspot mutations, 138 MMRd and/or MSI-H ECs, and 14 POLEmut/MMRd ECs. Among the 14 POLEmut/MMRd ECs, 11 (79 %) exhibited clonal POLE hotspot mutations; 4 (29 %) had a dominant POLE-related mutational signature, 4 (29 %) displayed dominant MMRd-related signatures, and 6 (43 %) had mixtures of POLE, aging/clock, MMRd, and POLEmut/MMRd-related SBS mutational signatures. The number of single nucleotide variants was higher in POLEmut/MMR-proficient (MMRp) and in POLEmut/MMRd ECs compared to POLE wild-type (wt)/MMRd EC (both p < 0.001). Small indels were enriched in POLEwt/MMRd ECs (p < 0.001). TMB was highest in POLEmut/MMRd EC compared to POLEmut/MMRp and POLEwt/MMRd ECs (both p < 0.001). Of 14 patients with POLEmut/MMRd EC, 21 % had a recurrence, versus 10 % of those with POLEmut/MMRp EC. Similar findings were noted in 3 POLEmut ECs in patients with Lynch syndrome; akin to somatic POLEmut ECs, these tumors had high TMB., Conclusion: POLEmut/MMRd ECs may be genetically distinct. Further studies are needed to assess the impact on outcomes and treatment response within this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Weigelt reports funding by REPARE Therapeutics, and employment of an immediate family member at AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Momeni-Boroujeni reports consulting work at Scorpion Therapeutics. Dr. Abu-Rustum reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. Dr. Liu reports research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, GSK/Tesaro, Repare Therapeutics and Artios Pharma unrelated to this work, and payment/honoraria from Topline Bio and HMP Education. The other authors do not have potential conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine the impact of adjuvant therapy on oncologic outcomes in patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA, IB, or II endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review at 4 international institutions. Patients with newly diagnosed clinical stage I or II disease of either clear cell or mixed histology with a clear cell component treated between 01/01/2000-12/31/2015 were included. Oncologic outcomes were assessed for patients based on adjuvant treatment received, including chemotherapy, radiation, or chemotherapy with radiation., Results: Of 125 patients identified and analyzed, 77 (61.6%) had clear cell histology and 118 (94.4%) had stage I disease. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range, 33-91). All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph node assessment. Twenty-five patients (20.0%) underwent surgical management alone and 100 (80.0%) received adjuvant therapy: 20 (16.0%) received postoperative chemotherapy, 47 (37.6%) received postoperative radiation, and 33 (26.4%) received postoperative chemotherapy with radiation. Median follow-up was 88.4 months (range, <1-234). Progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between surgery alone and type of adjuvant therapy (P = 0.18 and P = 0.56, respectively). Patients with mixed ECCC did not have a survival advantage over those with pure ECCC (5-year PFS rate, 85.0% vs 82.7%, P = 0.77; 5-year OS rate, 88.3% vs 91.2%, P = 0.94)., Conclusions: Receipt of adjuvant therapy in surgically staged I/II ECCC did not appear to offer a survival advantage over observation alone. Adjuvant therapy in early-stage ECCC with consideration of molecular classification should be evaluated., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Leitao reports personal fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, J&J/Ethicon, and Immunogen. Dr. Abu-Rustum reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. Dr. Eriksson reports speaker fees from Intuitive Surgical and AstraZeneca. Dr. Makker reports unpaid consulting/advisory roles with the following: Duality, Novartis, Morphosys, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Clovis Oncology, Karyopharm Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, ArQule, Cullinan, Faeth Therapeutics, Jazz, Immunocore, Iteos Therapeutics, Ideaya, Kartos Therapeutics, Lilly, Moreo, Prelude, Takeda, and Zymeworks; research funding from the following: Merck (Inst), Eisai (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Duality (Inst), Zymeworks (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst), Faeth Therapeutics (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), and Cullinan (Inst); travel, accommodations, and expenses from the following: Eisai, Merck, AstraZeneca; and a relationship with IBM. Dr. du Bois reports honoraria/expenses from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, Roche, and Zodiac; and consulting/advisory board role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, Clovis, Genmab/Seattle Genetics, GSK/Tesaro, MSD, Roche, Pfizer. The other authors do not have potential conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, open surgery has become the standard approach for radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Recent studies assessed the role of a non-radical approach in low risk cervical cancer and showed no survival difference compared with radical hysterectomy. However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer. This review offers an overview of the current evidence on the role of the minimally invasive approach in low risk cervical cancer and raises the need for a new clinical trial in this setting., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing strategies and follow-up of patients with cervical cancers, ovarian cancers, and borderline ovarian tumours. The developmental process of these guidelines is based on a systematic literature review and critical appraisal involving an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of 25 experts from relevant disciplines (ie, gynaecological oncology, oncofertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, imaging, conservative surgery, medical oncology, and histopathology). Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 121 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover oncological aspects of fertility-sparing strategies during the initial management, optimisation of fertility results and infertility management, and the patient's desire for future pregnancy and beyond., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PM reports having had an advisory role or received speaker's honoraria (paid to him or to his institution) from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and ImmunoGen. GS reports grants or contracts from MSD, consulting fees from Tesaro Bio Italy and Johnson and Johnson, and payment or honoraria from Clovis Oncology Italy. NRA-R reports grants or contracts from Grail (paid to the institution). FFi reports honoraria from Theramex and Organon, and support for attending and travelling to meetings from Organon, Merck-Serono, and Theramex (paid to the institution). SB reports honoraria from MSD; support for attending and travelling to meetings from Hologic, MSD, and Pfizer; and honoraria for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Hologic. CR-J reports payment for lectures (paid to the institution) from Organon and Novartis, speakers bureau (paid to the institution) from Gédéon Richter and Roche, and for manuscript writing (paid to the institution) from Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Drug resistance is the major cause of therapeutic failure in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Yet, the mechanisms by which tumors evolve to drug resistant states remains largely unknown. To address this, we aimed to exploit clone-specific genomic structural variations by combining scaled single-cell whole genome sequencing with longitudinally collected cell-free DNA (cfDNA), enabling clonal tracking before, during and after treatment. We developed a cfDNA hybrid capture, deep sequencing approach based on leveraging clone-specific structural variants as endogenous barcodes, with orders of magnitude lower error rates than single nucleotide variants in ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) detection, demonstrated on 19 patients at baseline. We then applied this to monitor and model clonal evolution over several years in ten HGSOC patients treated with systemic therapy from diagnosis through recurrence. We found drug resistance to be polyclonal in most cases, but frequently dominated by a single high-fitness and expanding clone, reducing clonal diversity in the relapsed disease state in most patients. Drug-resistant clones frequently displayed notable genomic features, including high-level amplifications of oncogenes such as CCNE1 , RAB25 , NOTCH3 , and ERBB2 . Using a population genetics Wright-Fisher model, we found evolutionary trajectories of these features were consistent with drug-induced positive selection. In select cases, these alterations impacted selection of secondary lines of therapy with positive patient outcomes. For cases with matched single-cell RNA sequencing data, pre-existing and genomically encoded phenotypic states such as upregulation of EMT and VEGF were linked to drug resistance. Together, our findings indicate that drug resistant states in HGSOC pre-exist at diagnosis and lead to dramatic clonal expansions that alter clonal composition at the time of relapse. We suggest that combining tumor single cell sequencing with cfDNA enables clonal tracking in patients and harbors potential for evolution-informed adaptive treatment decisions., Competing Interests: B.W. reports grant funding by Repare Therapeutics paid to the institution, outside the submitted work, and employment of a direct family member at AstraZeneca. C.A. reports grants from Clovis, Genentech, AbbVie and AstraZeneca and personal fees from Tesaro, Eisai/Merck, Mersana Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck and Repare Therapeutics, outside the scope of the submitted work. C.A. reports clinical trial funding to the institution from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, and Genentech/Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board in AstraZeneca and Merck; unpaid membership of the GOG Foundation Board of Directors and the NRG Oncology Board of Directors. M.F.B reports consulting fees (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Paige.AI), Research Support (Boundless Bio) and Intellectual Property Rights (SOPHiA Genetics). BL reports Intellectual propery rights (SOPHiA Genetics) and licensing royalties (BioLegend/Revvity). C.F. reports research funding to the institution from Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Daiichi; uncompensated membership of a scientific advisory board for Merck and Genentech; and is a consultant for OncLive, Aptitude Health, Bristol Myers Squibb and Seagen, all outside the scope of this manuscript. D.S.C. reports membership of the medical advisory board of Verthermia Acquio Inc and Biom’up, is a paid speaker for AstraZeneca, and holds stock of Doximity, Moderna, and BioNTech. D.Z. reports institutional grants from Merck, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Plexxikon, and Synthekine, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Xencor, Memgen, Takeda, Astellas, Immunos, Tessa Therapeutics, Miltenyi, and Calidi Biotherapeutics. D.Z. own a patent on use of oncolytic Newcastle Disease Virus for cancer therapy. N.A.-R. reports grants to the institution from Stryker/Novadaq and GRAIL, outside the submitted work. S.P.S. reports research funding from AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the scope of this work.

Whole-genome doubling (WGD) is a critical driver of tumor development and is linked to drug resistance and metastasis in solid malignancies. Here, we demonstrate that WGD is an ongoing mutational process in tumor evolution. Using single-cell whole-genome sequencing, we measured and modeled how WGD events are distributed across cellular populations within tumors and associated WGD dynamics with properties of genome diversification and phenotypic consequences of innate immunity. We studied WGD evolution in 65 high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) tissue samples from 40 patients, yielding 29,481 tumor cell genomes. We found near-ubiquitous evidence of WGD as an ongoing mutational process promoting cell-cell diversity, high rates of chromosomal missegregation, and consequent micronucleation. Using a novel mutation-based WGD timing method, doubleTime , we delineated specific modes by which WGD can drive tumor evolution: (i) unitary evolutionary origin followed by significant diversification, (ii) independent WGD events on a pre-existing background of copy number diversity, and (iii) evolutionarily late clonal expansions of WGD populations. Additionally, through integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and high-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that inflammatory signaling and cGAS-STING pathway activation result from ongoing chromosomal instability and are restricted to tumors that remain predominantly diploid. This contrasted with predominantly WGD tumors, which exhibited significant quiescent and immunosuppressive phenotypic states. Together, these findings establish WGD as an evolutionarily 'active' mutational process that promotes evolvability and dysregulated immunity in late stage ovarian cancer.

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget's disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.

Background: Racial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry-based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown., Methods: Germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry., Results: Among 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self-reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non-Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p = .009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p < .001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11-2.34) compared with patients of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability-high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%)., Conclusions: In those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention., Plain Language Summary: Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)