Search

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) along with emergent carotid stent placement (eCAS) has been suggested to have a greater benefit in patients with tandem lesions (TL), compared with other strategies of treatment. Nonetheless, there is no agreement on whether the intracranial occlusion should be treated before the cervical ICA lesion, or vice versa. In this retrospective multicenter study, we sought to compare clinical and procedural outcomes of the 2 different treatment approaches in patients with TL., Materials and Methods: The prospective databases of 17 comprehensive stroke centers were screened for consecutive patients with TL who received MT and eCAS. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on whether they received MT before eCAS (MT-first approach) or eCAS before MT (eCAS-first approach). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of the retrograde-versus-anterograde approach on procedure-related and clinical outcome measures. These included the modified TICI score 2b-3, other procedure-related parameters and adverse events after the endovascular procedure, and the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores., Results: A total of 295 consecutive patients were initially enrolled. Among them, 208 (70%) received MT before eCAS. After propensity score matching, 56 pairs of patients were available for analysis. In the matched population, the MT-first approach resulted in a higher rate of successful intracranial recanalization (91% versus 73% in the eCAS-first approach, P  = .025) and a mean shorter groin-to-reperfusion time (72 [SD, 38] minutes versus 93 [SD, 50] minutes in the anterograde approach, P  = .017). Despite a higher rate of efficient recanalization in the MT-first group, we did not observe a significant difference regarding the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores. Rates of procedure-related adverse events and the occurrence of both parenchymal hemorrhage types 1 and 2 were comparable., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in patients with TL undergoing endovascular treatment, prioritizing the intracranial occlusion is associated with an increased rate of efficient MT and faster recanalization time. However, this strategy does not have an advantage in long-term clinical outcome. Future controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment technique., (© 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background: Collaterals are a strong determinant of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing Endovascular Treatment (EVT). Careggi Collateral Score (CCS) is an angiographic score that demonstrated to be superior to the widely suggested ASITN/SIR score. Multi-phase CT-Angiography (mCTA) could be alternatively adopted for collateral assessment. We investigated whether mCTA had an equivalent predictive performance for functional outcome compared to CCS., Methods: Consecutive AIS patients undergoing EVT for large vessel occlusion within 24 h from onset were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariable logistic regression were investigated to evaluate the predictive performance of mCTA collateral score (range 0-5) and CCS (range 0-4) for good functional outcome (three-months modified Rankin Scale 0-2)., Results: We included 201 subjects (59.7% females, mean age 75), of whom 96 (47.7%) had good outcome at three-months. Both CCS (OR = 14.4, 95% CI = 6.3-33.8) and mCTA (OR = 23.8, 95% CI = 10.1-56.4) collateral scores were independent predictors of outcome. The AUC of CCS was 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.86) and the best cut-off was ≥ 3 (87% sensitivity, 71% specificity), while the AUC of mCTA collateral score was 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) with an optimal cut-off of ≥ 4 (85% sensitivity, 87% specificity). Patients with good mCTA collaterals experienced smaller (16.6 vs. 63.7 mL, p < 0.001) infarct lesion as compared to those with mCTA poor collaterals., Conclusion: mCTA discriminative ability for three-months 0-2 mRS was found to be comparable to CCS. mCTA appears a valid, non-invasive imaging modality for evaluating collaterals of AIS patients potentially eligible for EVT., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Dr. Morotti received expert meeting and advisory board honoraria from EMG-REG International and AstraZeneca. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Florence (Ethics Committee Approval code: 26299). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Introduction: The latest research in ischaemic stroke pathogenesis is directed to unveil what is inside embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Whether vulnerable non stenotic carotid plaques (NSTEPS), i.e. atherosclerotic lesions in carotid arteries determining a stenosis lower than 50%, may represent a cause of stroke in ESUS is a matter of debate. We aimed to study the prevalence of NSTEPS in an ESUS population., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified a consecutive ESUS population admitted to the Stroke-Unit of Careggi Hospital, Italy from 2019 to 2022. Characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques (thickness, ulceration, hypodensity) and their location (ipsilateral versus contralateral to the stroke) were studied on carotid CT angiography (CTA). Follow-up data were recorded up to 24 months after stroke., Results: We identified 57 ESUS patients with unilateral ischaemic lesions studied with CTA; 53 (93%) had an ipsilateral carotid plaque, 81% contralateral, (p = 0.754) and 74% both. Plaques ipsilateral to stroke were ≥ 3 mm thick in 15 (28%) patients; hypodense in 14 (26%) and ulcerated in 5 (9%). The frequency of hypodensity was higher in ipsilateral compared to contralateral plaques (26% vs. 13%, p = 0.039) and ulceration was around four times more frequent, although not statistically significant (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.219). At follow-up, six patients had stroke recurrence (11%), 2 of them were in the same vascular territory of the former., Discussion and Conclusions: Our data suggest that plaques ipsilateral to stroke seem to be more frequently vulnerable and consequently more prone to embolization. Prospective data are needed to clarify the causal role of NSTEPS in ESUS., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: Ethical approval was waved because of the retrospective nature of the study. Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for their anonymized information to be published in this article. Conflicting interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)