Search

One of the fundamental tenets of quantum mechanics is that non-orthogonal states cannot be distinguished perfectly. When distinguishing multiple copies of a mixed quantum state, a collective measurement, which generates entanglement between the different copies of the unknown state, can achieve a lower error probability than non-entangling measurements. The error probability that can be attained using a collective measurement on a finite number of copies of the unknown state is given by the Helstrom bound. In the limit where we can perform a collective measurement on asymptotically many copies of the quantum state, the quantum Chernoff bound gives the attainable error probability. It is natural to ask at what rate does the error tend to this asymptotic limit, and whether the asymptotic limit can be attained for any finite number of copies. In this paper we address these questions. We find analytic expressions for the Helstrom bound for arbitrarily many copies of the unknown state in several simple qubit examples. Using these analytic expressions, we investigate how the attainable error rate changes as we allow collective measurements on finite numbers of copies of the quantum state. We also investigate the necessary conditions to saturate the M-copy Helstrom bound. It is known that a collective measurement on all M-copies of the unknown state is always sufficient to saturate the M-copy Helstrom bound. However, general conditions for when such a measurement is necessary to saturate the Helstrom bound remain unknown. We investigate specific measurement strategies which involve entangling operations on fewer than all M-copies of the unknown state. For many regimes we find that a collective measurement on all M-copies of the unknown state is necessary to saturate the M-copy Helstrom bound., Comment: Comments very welcome

Measurement estimation bounds for local quantum multiparameter estimation, which provide lower bounds on possible measurement uncertainties, have so far been formulated in two ways: by extending the classical Cram\'er--Rao bound (e.g., the quantum Cram\'er--Rao bound and the Nagaoka Cram'er--Rao bound) and by incorporating the parameter estimation framework with the uncertainty principle, as in the Lu--Wang uncertainty relation. In this work, we present a general framework that allows a direct comparison between these different types of estimation limits. Specifically, we compare the attainability of the Nagaoka Cram\'er--Rao bound and the Lu--Wang uncertainty relation, using analytical and numerical techniques. We show that these two limits can provide different information about the physically attainable precision. We present an example where both limits provide the same attainable precision and an example where the Lu--Wang uncertainty relation is not attainable even for pure states. We further demonstrate that the unattainability in the latter case arises because the figure of merit underpinning the Lu--Wang uncertainty relation (the difference between the quantum and classical Fisher information matrices) does not necessarily agree with the conventionally used figure of merit (mean squared error). The results offer insights into the general attainability and applicability of the Lu--Wang uncertainty relation. Furthermore, our proposed framework for comparing bounds of different types may prove useful in other settings., Comment: 13 pages, 7 figures

In multi-parameter quantum metrology, the resource of entanglement can lead to an increase in efficiency of the estimation process. Entanglement can be used in the state preparation stage, or the measurement stage, or both, to harness this advantage; here we focus on the role of entangling measurements. Specifically, entangling or collective measurements over multiple identical copies of a probe state are known to be superior to measuring each probe individually, but the extent of this improvement is an open problem. It is also known that such entangling measurements, though resource-intensive, are required to attain the ultimate limits in multi-parameter quantum metrology and quantum information processing tasks. In this work we investigate the maximum precision improvement that collective quantum measurements can offer over individual measurements for estimating parameters of qudit states, calling this the 'collective quantum enhancement'. We show that, whereas the maximum enhancement can, in principle, be a factor of $n$ for estimating $n$ parameters, this bound is not tight for large $n$. Instead, our results prove an enhancement linear in dimension of the qudit is possible using collective measurements and lead us to conjecture that this is the maximum collective quantum enhancement in any local estimation scenario., Comment: 22 pages, 9 figures, 10 appendices; presented at AIP Summer Meeting 2023

Entanglement shared between distant parties is a key resource in quantum networks. However, photon losses in quantum channels significantly reduce the success probability of entanglement sharing, which scales quadratically with the channel transmission. Quantum repeaters using entanglement swapping can mitigate this effect, but usually require high-performance photonic quantum memories to synchronize photonic qubits. In this work, we theoretically and experimentally investigate an entanglement swapping protocol using photon-number-encoded states that can effectively alleviate quantum channel losses without requiring photonic quantum memories. We demonstrate that the protocol exhibits a success probability scaling linearly with the channel transmission. Furthermore, we show that while unbalanced channel losses can degrade the shared entanglement, this effect can be compensated by optimally adjusting the initial entangled states. Our results highlight the potential of photon-number encoding for realizing robust entanglement distribution in lossy quantum networks., Comment: 7 pages, 6 figures, 39 references

The symmetric logarithmic derivative Cram\'er-Rao bound (SLDCRB) provides a fundamental limit to the minimum variance with which a set of unknown parameters can be estimated in an unbiased manner. It is known that the SLDCRB can be saturated provided the optimal measurements for the individual parameters commute with one another. However, when this is not the case the SLDCRB cannot be attained in general. In the experimentally relevant setting, where quantum states are measured individually, necessary and sufficient conditions for when the SLDCRB can be saturated are not known. In this setting the SLDCRB is attainable provided the SLD operators can be chosen to commute on an extended Hilbert space. However, beyond this relatively little is known about when the SLD operators can be chosen in this manner. In this paper we present explicit examples which demonstrate novel aspects of this condition. Our examples demonstrate that the SLD operators commuting on any two of the following three spaces: support space, support-kernel space and kernel space, is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for commutativity on the extended space. We present a simple analytic example showing that the Nagaoka-Hayashi Cram\'er-Rao bound is not always attainable. Finally, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the attainability of the SLDCRB in the case when the kernel space is one-dimensional. These results provide new information on the necessary and sufficient conditions for the attainability of the SLDCRB., Comment: Comments very welcome

The ability of quantum states to be in superposition is one of the key features that sets them apart from the classical world. This `coherence' is rigorously quantified by resource theories, which aim to understand how such properties may be exploited in quantum technologies. There has been much research on what the resource theory of coherence can reveal about quantum metrology, almost all of which has been from the viewpoint of Fisher information. We prove however that the relative entropy of coherence, and its recent generalisation to POVMs, naturally quantify the performance of Bayesian metrology. In particular, we show how a coherence measure can be applied to an ensemble of states. We then prove that during parameter estimation, the ensemble relative entropy of coherence is equal to the difference between the information gained, and the optimal Holevo information. We call this relation the CXI equality. The ensemble coherence lets us visualise how much information is locked away in superposition inaccessible with a given measurement scheme, and quantify the advantage that would be gained by using a joint measurement on multiple states. Our results hold regardless of how the parameter is encoded in the state, encompassing unitary, dissipative, and discrete settings. We consider both projective measurements, and general POVMs. This work suggests new directions for research in quantum resource theories, provides a novel operational interpretation for the relative entropy of coherence and its POVM generalisation, and introduces a new tool to study the role of quantum features in metrology., Comment: 10 pages main + 4 pages supplementary