Search

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is a hyperinflammatory syndrome. The biomarkers of inflammation best suited to triage patients with COVID‐19 are unknown. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study of adult patients hospitalized specifically for COVID‐19 from February 1, 2020 to October 19, 2022. Biomarkers measured included soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6, procalcitonin, ferritin, and D‐dimer. In‐hospital outcomes examined include death and the need for mechanical ventilation. Patients admitted in the United States (US, n = 1962) were used to compute area under the curves (AUCs) and identify biomarker cutoffs. The combined European cohorts (n = 1137) were used to validate the biomarker cutoffs. In the US cohort, 356 patients met the composite outcome of death (n = 197) or need for mechanical ventilation (n = 290). SuPAR was the most important predictor of the composite outcome and had the highest AUC (0.712) followed by CRP (0.642), ferritin (0.619), IL‐6 (0.614), D‐dimer (0.606), and lastly procalcitonin (0.596). Inclusion of other biomarkers did not improve discrimination. A suPAR cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI: 92.4%–98.0%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.5% (95% CI: 87.5%–96.9%) for the composite outcome. Patients with suPAR < 4.0 ng/mL comprised 10.6% of the cohort and had a 0.8% probability of the composite outcome. Applying this cutoff to the validation cohort yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% (90.4%–96.7%) and NPV of 95.5% (93.1%–97.8%) for the composite outcome. Among commonly measured biomarkers, suPAR offered stronger discriminatory ability and may be useful in triaging low‐risk patients with COVID‐19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We sought to determine whether the biomarkers of chronic inflammation predict cognitive decline in a prospective observational study. We measured baseline serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in 282 participants of the University of Michigan Memory and Aging Project. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale for up to five time points. SuPAR and hs-CRP levels were not significantly higher in participants with mild cognitive impairment ( n  = 97) or dementia ( n  = 59), compared to those with normal cognitive function ( n  = 126). Overall, 14% of participants experienced significant cognitive decline over the study period. The change in MoCA or CDR scores over time did not differ significantly according to baseline suPAR or hs-CRP levels. Chronic systemic inflammation, as measured by serum suPAR or hs-CRP levels, is unlikely to contribute significantly to cognitive decline., Competing Interests: SSH is a member of the scientific advisory board of Walden Biosciences. Other authors do not have a conflict of interest. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)