Search

Background: Although several techniques for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) have been introduced, there have still been reports on various complications such as delayed union, nonunion, refracture, wrist pain, plate irritation, and chronic regional pain syndrome. This study aimed to compare the differences in radiological and clinical outcomes of patients in which intramedullary bone grafting was performed in addition to plate stabilization with those without additional bone grafting during ulnar shortening osteotomies (USOs)., Methods: Between November 2014 and June 2021, 53 wrists of 50 patients with idiopathic UIS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether intramedullary bone grafting was performed. Among the 53 wrists, USO with an intramedullary bone graft was performed in 21 wrists and USO without an intramedullary bone graft was performed in 32 wrists. Demographic data and factors potentially associated with bone union time were analyzed., Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups when comparing postoperative radioulnar distance, postoperative ulnar variance, amount of ulnar shortening, and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Compared to the without-intramedullary bone graft group, bone union time of the osteotomy site was significantly shortened, from 8.8 ± 3.0 weeks to 6.7 ± 1.3 weeks in the with-intramedullary bone graft group. Moreover, there were no cases of nonunion or plate-induced symptoms. Both in univariable and multivariable analyses, intramedullary bone grafting was associated with shorter bone union time., Conclusions: USO with an intramedullary bone graft for idiopathic UIS has favorable radiological and clinical outcomes. The advantage of this technique is the significant shortening of bone union time., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.)

Purpose: We attempted a technique for patients with congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis involving simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy of the synostosis site and distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal along with correction of the metacarpal joint abduction contracture. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and its outcomes., Methods: We reviewed the medical records of children with congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis treated surgically at our institute. Eight hands of six children with an average age of 5.0 (range, 1.7-9.3) years were treated by simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy, distraction lengthening, and tenotomy of abductor digiti minimi. We measured the metacarpal head-to-capitate area ratios from serial radiographs and analyzed them according to age. We also measured the change in the intermetacarpal angle (IMA) and metacarpal length ratio during an average of 8.1 (range, 1.4-16.8) years of follow-up. These changes were compared with changes in seven hands of five children with an average age of 8.1 (range, 1.5-15.6) years treated by the same method, but without a distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal and followed up for an of average 12.1 (range, 4.1-19.8) years, as a control group., Results: Abnormal metacarpal head-to-capitate area ratio before surgery was normalized in all patients within the first 2 years after surgery. The IMA change averaged 39.8°, and the metacarpal length ratio changed by 17%. The control group showed an average IMA change of 36.6° and metacarpal length ratio change of 6%., Conclusions: Simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy of the synostosis site and distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal with correction of metacarpal joint abduction contracture can restore the radiographic parameters in congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis. The normalized ossification of the fifth metacarpal head indicates that the surgical procedure is probably safe., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic V., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)