Search

Introduction Females, versus males, have shown a slower decline in smoking prevalence, greater smoking-related mortality and morbidity, and tend to have more difficulty achieving and maintaining abstinence. Identifying sex-specific risk factors is needed to improve outcomes. Though ovarian hormones have been evaluated for their role in smoking and relapse, measures tend to be static and infrequent, failing to capture the influence of increasing or decreasing levels. Aims and Methods The present study evaluated the effect of static and fluctuating levels of ovarian hormones (ie, progesterone, estradiol, and estrogen to progesterone [E/P] ratio) on stress reactivity, cigarette craving, and smoking during a laboratory relapse paradigm. Female participants (assigned female at birth) reporting daily cigarette smoking (N  = 91, ages 18–45) were recruited from the community. Participants provided daily salivary ovarian hormone levels leading up to a laboratory session, in which stress was induced and stress reactivity, cigarette craving, latency to smoke, and ad-libitum smoking were measured. Results Static levels of estradiol were associated with stress reactivity (β  = 0.28, SE = 0.13) and static E/P ratio was associated with smoking in the laboratory (HR = 1.4). Preceding 3-day changes in estradiol and E/P ratio, but neither static levels nor preceding 3-day changes in progesterone were associated with stress reactivity, cigarette craving, or smoking in a relapse paradigm. Conclusions Ovarian hormones are among several sex-specific factors involved in the complex neuroendocrine response to stress, and their interaction with other biological, social, and psychological factors in the real-world environment is not yet fully understood. Implications Findings of the present study provide novel information regarding the role of ovarian hormones among female participants who smoke daily in stress reactivity and smoking in the context of a laboratory relapse paradigm and highlight several avenues for future research. We found that same-day estradiol levels were associated with increased subjective stress reactivity and same-day estrogen to progesterone ratio was associated with increased likelihood of smoking in a relapse paradigm. Ovarian hormones are among several sex-specific factors contributing to the complex neuroendocrine response to stress, and their interaction with other biological, social, and psychological factors in the real-world environment is not yet fully understood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction This study sought to compare medication efficacy in participants with medical comorbidities who smoke in the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) trial, a double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled randomized controlled trial. Aims and Methods Participants were from the U.S. cohort of the main trial and randomized (1:1:1:1) to varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patch, or placebo for 12 weeks with follow-up through week 24. Medical comorbidity data were derived from the baseline medical screening questionnaire and categorized into four subgroups (cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes). Within each comorbidity, generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the association between treatment and continuous abstinence rates from weeks 9–12 to 9–24. Similar models were used to test the effect of number of comorbidities on abstinence. Results Varenicline resulted in the highest week 12 abstinence rates across all pharmacotherapies and compared to placebo in all comorbidity subgroups: Cardiac (40.0% vs. 3.6%; odds ratios [OR] = 23.3 [5.1–107.1]), respiratory (24.7% vs. 12.8%; OR = 2.2 [1.3–3.8]), vascular (29.1% vs. 10.4%; OR = 3.6 [2.3–5.7]), and diabetes (30.9% vs. 8.3%; OR = 6.5 [2.3–19.0]). This was maintained at week 24 for those with cardiac (23.3% vs. 1.8%; OR = 21.7 [2.7–178.2]), vascular (18.9% vs. 7.1%; OR = 3.1 [1.8–5.3]), and diabetes (20.6% vs. 4.2%; OR = 8.4 [2.1–33.7]) comorbidities. Treatment contrasts within some comorbidity subgroups revealed superior efficacy of varenicline over other pharmacotherapies. All pharmacotherapies increased the odds of abstinence regardless of number of comorbidities. Conclusions Varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with manageable cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes conditions to quit smoking, supporting recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as first-line pharmacotherapy. Bupropion and NRT demonstrated efficacy for some comorbidity subgroups. Implications This secondary analysis of the EAGLES trial demonstrated that varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes diagnoses to quit smoking. This demonstration of varenicline efficacy among individuals with comorbid medical conditions supports recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as a first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the popularity and ease of single-item craving assessments, we developed a multi-item measure and compared it to common single-item assessments in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) context. Two weeks of EMA data were collected from 48 emerging adults (56.25% female, 85.42% White) who frequently used cannabis. Eight craving items were administered, and multilevel factor analyses were used to identify the best fitting model. The resulting scale’s factors represented purposefulness/general desire and emotionality/negative affect craving. Convergent validity was examined using measures of craving, cannabis use disorder symptoms, frequency of use, cannabis cue reactivity, cannabis use, negative affect, and impulsivity. The scale factors were associated with cue-reactivity craving, negative affect, impulsivity, and subfactors of existing craving measures. For researchers interested in using a single item to capture craving, one item performed particularly well. However, the new scale may provide a more nuanced assessment of mechanisms underlying craving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of e-cigarettes has been increasing, especially since the introduction of 'pod' devices to the marketplace since 2018. Most adults who vape report interest in quitting. The present study examined level of interest in e-cigarette cessation between users with varying cigarette smoking histories and device types., Methods: Data obtained from wave 5 (2018-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (n=34 309). Analyses were conducted on adult current established e-cigarette users, categorised on cigarette smoking history (current, former or never) and device type (disposable, cartridge/pod, tank or mod). Participants reported if they planned to ever quit e-cigarettes, attempted to quit in the past year and attempted to quit by cutting back in the past year., Results: Of the 2922 established e-cigarette users, 68.21% reported plans to quit vaping; 17.27% reported attempting to quit e-cigarettes in the past year; and 29.28% reported attempting to quit by cutting back in the past year. Cartridge users had higher odds of interest in quitting than tank and mod users. Disposable and cartridge users had higher odds of reporting a past year quit attempt than tank and mod users. Individuals with no smoking history had higher odds of reporting a past year quit attempt or cutting back relative to those reporting dual use (of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes) and former smoking., Conclusions: Tobacco control should consider the type of e-cigarette device that is being used, alongside users' cigarette smoking history, when developing interventions and other resources for vaping cessation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: In the past 3 years, BT has testified on behalf of plaintiffs who have filed litigation against the tobacco industry., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Despite decades of progress, cigarette smoking remains a significant contributor to disease burden. This effect is especially pronounced for specific priority populations, such as individuals who live in rural communities, in that the burden of tobacco smoking is greater among these groups than in urban areas and the general population. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of two novel tobacco treatment interventions delivered through remote telehealth procedures to individuals who smoke in the state of South Carolina. Results also include exploratory analyses of smoking cessation outcomes. Study I evaluated savoring, a strategy based on mindfulness practices, alongside nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Study II evaluated retrieval-extinction training (RET), a memory-modification paradigm alongside NRT. In Study I (savoring), recruitment and retention data showed high interest and engagement in the intervention components, and participants who received this intervention decreased cigarette smoking throughout the course of the treatment ( p s < .05). In Study II (RET), results showed high interest and moderate engagement in treatment, although exploratory outcome analyses did not demonstrate significant treatment effects on smoking behaviors. Overall, both studies showed promise in generating interest among individuals who smoke in participating in remotely delivered, telehealth smoking cessation interventions with novel therapeutic targets. A brief savoring intervention appeared to have effects on cigarette smoking throughout treatment, whereas RET did not. Gaining insight from the present pilot study, future studies may improve the efficacy of these procedures and incorporate the treatment components into more robust available treatments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).