Search

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) encompasses heterogeneous mastocytosis subtypes and is associated with poor outcomes. Although midostaurin was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be approved for AdvSM patients, long-lasting responses are limited. The mutation-Adjusted Risk Score (MARS), the International Prognostic Scoring System for mastocytosis (IPSM) and the Global Prognostic Score for Systemic Mastocytosis (GPSM) have been established to characterize the outcomes of patients with overall AdvSM. However, given the outcome's dependency on the AdvSM subtype, prognostic characterization within each subtype is critical. We aimed to study the predictive ability using Harrell's concordance index of prognostic scores according to the AdvSM subtype. We conducted a nationwide retrospective study using the French mastocytosis reference center's registry and included all midostaurin-treated patients with C finding. Overall, 170 patients were identified: 46 aggressive SM (ASM), 11 mast cell leukemia (MCL), and 113 SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN). All risk scores improved their discriminative value for overall survival (OS) when combined with the AdvSM subtype. The best predictive value was for adjusted MARS (C-index = 0.689), followed by GPSM (C-index = 0.677) and IPSM (C-index = 0.618). In a multivariable analysis, MARS stratification and the AdvSM subtype were both prognostic for OS. Accordingly, five subgroups of patients with AdvSM and a different median OS were identified: 9.9 months for MCL, 24 months for intermediate/high-risk SM-AHN, 33 months for intermediate/high-risk ASM, 58 months for low-risk SM-AHN and was not reached for low-risk ASM (p < 0.001). The AdvSM subtype and the MARS are the most predictive of OS and should prompt specific management., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Not available.

Background: Bidirectional interactions between eosinophils and mast cells (MCs) have been reported in various allergic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) eosinophilia, and to a lesser extent blood eosinophilia, is common in systemic mastocytosis (SM), but its significance remains unknown., Objective: We described blood and BM eosinophil characteristics in SM., Methods: A large collection of BM biopsy samples was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and whole-slide imaging. Eosinophil and extracellular granules were detected by eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) staining and MCs by KIT staining. Complementary analyses were conducted using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence., Results: Eosinophil infiltrates and large areas of eosinophil degranulation were observed within or around BM MC infiltrates in SM. EPX staining surface, highlighting intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation, was higher in nonadvanced SM (n = 37 BM biopsy samples) compared with both controls (n = 8, P = .0003) and advanced SM (n = 24, P = .014). In nonadvanced SM, positive correlations were observed between serum tryptase levels and percentages of eosinophil counts in BM aspirations (Spearman r coefficient r = 0.38, P = .038), eosinophils count in BM biopsy samples (r = 0.45, P = .007), EPX staining (r = 0.37, P = .035), and eosinophil degranulation (r = 0.39, P = .023). Eosinophil counts in BM biopsy samples also correlated with MC counts (r = 0.47, P = .006) and KIT staining surface (r = 0.49, P = .003). BM MCs expressed IL-5 receptor and other usual eosinophil cytokine/chemokine receptors, and blood eosinophils displayed several increased surface markers compared with controls, suggesting an activated state., Conclusion: Our data suggest possible cross talk between MCs and eosinophils, supporting MC tryptase release and MC activation-related symptoms. This suggests a rationale for targeting eosinophils in nonadvanced SM not fully controlled by other therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Funding provided by GSK (ISS 10889). The authors are solely responsible for final content and interpretation. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: O. Hermine received research funds from Blueprint, AB Science, Alexion, and BMS; and is cofounder and shareholder of Innatherys and AB Science. D. Launay received consulting fees from AstraZeneca. G. Lefèvre received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Sanofi; and research funds from AstraZeneca and GSK. J. Rossignol received consulting fees from Blueprint and research funds from Novartis. D. Staumont-Salle received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by the accumulation of atypical mast cells (MCs) in organs. Liver histology of SM has been marginally described and accurate histological classification is critical, given the consequences of aggressive SM diagnosis. We aimed to describe the histological features associated with liver SM using updated tools., Methods: Using the database of the French Reference Centre for Mastocytosis, we retrospectively identified patients with a liver biopsy (LB) and a diagnosis of SM. All LB procedures were performed according to the local physician in charge and centrally reviewed by an expert pathologist., Results: A total of 28 patients were included: 6 had indolent SM, 9 had aggressive SM, and 13 had SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm. Twenty-five (89%) patients presented hepatomegaly, and 19 (68%) had portal hypertension. The LB frequently showed slight sinusoid dilatation (82%). Fibrosis was observed in 3/6 indolent SM and in almost all advanced SM cases (21/22), but none of them showed cirrhosis. A high MC burden (>50 MCs/high-power field) was correlated with elevated blood alkaline phosphatase levels (p = .030). The presence of portal hypertension was associated with a higher mean fibrosis grade (1.6 vs. 0.8 in its absence; p = .026). In advanced SM, the presence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) was associated with decreased overall survival (9.5 vs. 46.3 months, p = .002)., Conclusions: MC infiltration induced polymorphic hepatic lesions and the degree of fibrosis is associated with portal hypertension. NRH identifies a poor prognosis subgroup of patients with advanced SM. Assessing liver histology can aid in SM prognostic evaluation., (© 2024 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) corresponds to a rare and heterogeneous spectrum of diseases characterized by the accumulation of atypical mast cells (MCs). Advanced mastocytosis (Adv-SM) is associated with poor survival; in contrast, patients with non-advanced SM (non-Adv-SM) usually have a normal life expectancy but may experience poor quality of life. Despite recent therapeutic progress including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, new treatment options are needed for refractory and/or intolerant patients with both severely symptomatic and Adv-SM. In vitro, the mTOR pathway is activated in MCs from patients bearing the KIT D816V mutation. Furthermore, rapamycin induces the apoptosis of KIT D816V MCs selectively. In this nationwide study, we report the outcomes of patients diagnosed with SM and treated with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (imTOR) within the French National Reference Center for mastocytosis (CEREMAST). All patients registered were relapsing, treatment-refractory, or ineligible for other cytoreductive therapy. Non-Adv-SM patients received imTOR as a monotherapy (rapamycin/everolimus), and Adv-SM patients received imTOR as a monotherapy or in combination with cytarabine. The objective response rate (ORR) in non-Adv-SM was 60% (partial response in 40% and major response in 20%), including reductions in skin involvement, mediator release symptoms, and serum tryptase. In the Adv-SM group, the ORR was 20% (including one major response and one partial response, both in patients with a KIT D816V mutation), which enabled a successful bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in one patient. Our results suggest that imTOR treatment has potential benefits in patients with SM harboring a KIT D816V mutation., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Mastocytosis and monoclonal mast cell (MC) activation syndrome (MMAS) are heterogeneous conditions characterized by the accumulation of atypical MCs. Despite the recurrent involvement of KIT mutations, the pathophysiologic origin of mastocytosis and MMAS is unclear. Although hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT, related to TPSAB1 gene duplication) is abnormally frequent in these diseases, it is not known whether the association is coincidental or causal., Objective: We evaluated the prevalence of HαT in all mastocytosis subtypes and MMAS and assessed the pathophysiologic association with HαT., Methods: Clinical data, laboratory data, KIT mutations, TPSAB1 duplication (assessed by droplet digital PCR), and HαT prevalence were retrospectively recorded for all patients with mastocytosis and MMAS registered in the French national referral center database and compared to a control cohort. To increase the power of our analysis for advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM), we pooled our cohort with literature cases., Results: We included 583 patients (27 with MMAS and 556 with mastocytosis). The prevalence of HαT in mastocytosis was 12.6%, significantly higher than in the general population (5.7%, P = .002) and lower than in MMAS (33.3%, P = .02). HαT + patients were more likely to have anaphylactic reactions and less likely to have cutaneous lesions than HαT - patients (43.0% vs 24.4%, P = .006; 57.7% vs 75.6%, respectively, P = .006). In the pooled analysis, the prevalence of HαT was higher in advSM (11.5%) than in control cohorts (5.2%, P = .01)., Conclusion: Here we confirm the increase incidence of anaphylaxis in HαT + mastocytosis patients. The increased prevalence of HαT in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis (including advSM) is suggestive of pathophysiologic involvement., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)