Search

Background Context: Spondylodiscitis management presents significant clinical challenges, particularly in critically ill patients, where the risks and benefits of surgical intervention must be carefully balanced. The optimal timing of surgery in this context remains a subject of debate., Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of early surgery versus delayed surgery or conservative management in critically ill patients with de novo pyogenic spondylodiscitis., Study Design/setting: This is an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 24 centers, primarily in Europe., Patient Sample: The study included 192 critically ill patients (65.63% male) with a median age of 69 years, all severely affected by pyogenic spondylodiscitis characterized by an initial CRP level >200 mg/l or the presence of two out of four Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria upon admission., Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and relapse rates of spondylodiscitis., Methods: Patients were divided into three groups: early surgery (within three days of admission), delayed surgery (after three days of admission), and conservative therapy. Propensity score matching and multivariate regression analyses were performed to adjust for baseline differences and assess the impact of treatment modalities on mortality and other clinical outcomes., Results: Delayed surgery was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality (4.05%) compared to early surgery (27.85%) and conservative therapy (27.78%) (p<0.001). Delayed surgery also resulted in shorter hospital stays (42.76 days) compared to conservative therapy (55.53 days) and early surgery (26.33 days) (p<0.001), and shorter ICU stays (4.52 days) compared to conservative therapy (16.48 days) and early surgery (7.92 days) (p<0.001). The optimal window for surgery, minimizing mortality, was identified as ten to fourteen days post-admission (p=0.02). Risk factors for increased mortality included age (p<0.05), multiple organ failure (p<0.05), and vertebral body destruction (p<0.05), whereas delayed surgery (p<0.05) and the presence of an epidural abscess were associated with reduced mortality (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Delayed surgery, optimally between 10 to 14 days post-admission, was associated with lower mortality in critically ill spondylodiscitis patients. These findings highlight the potential benefits of considering surgical timing to improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The role of brain metastases (BM) surgery is of paramount importance for patients' progression-free and overall survival. "En-bloc" and "piecemeal" resection represent the main surgical techniques. Although en-bloc resection remains the best surgical option, it is not widely adopted or feasible as the first choice. We describe our point of view about the en-bloc surgical technique with an illustrative case and discuss its indications with pros and cons through a comprehensive literature review. Materials and methods: A Medline search up to December 2023 in the Embase and PubMed online electronic databases was made and PRISMA statement was followed. An illustrative case of "en-bloc" resection from our surgical series was also added as a technical note. Results: We describe tips and tricks of our surgical technique and added a surgical video from our series. The literature review disclosed 19 studies. Resulting data suggested that "en-bloc" resection, when feasible, provides lesser risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, local recurrence rates, intraoperative bleeding occurrence and perioperative complications; in addition, it preserves the normal anatomy. Conclusions: En-bloc resection is the gold standard technique for surgical treatment of brain metastases especially for patients with superficial lesions that are small in size and far from eloquent areas.

Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a low-grade tumor of the sinonasal tract with frequent extension to the orbit and skull base. Due to its rare incidence and recent histopathological and molecular characterization, little data are available in regard to its natural history, treatment and surveillance protocol., Methods: A comprehensive literature review in Embase online electronic databases on BSNS was made. The analyzed factors included the patients' sex and age, presenting symptoms and signs, anatomical origin and pattern of growth of the tumor, immunohistochemical and molecular features, time to treatment, type of treatment, surgical approach, extent of resection, peri- and post-operative complications, adjuvant therapies, clinical outcome, recurrence and overall survival rates., Results: This literature review involved 34 studies for an overall series of 149 cases of BSNS. The female (66.9%) and middle-aged populations (median 54.88 years old) were mainly affected. The most frequent clinical onset was nasal obstruction (81%), followed by facial discomfort (44%), epistaxis (15.5%) and ocular impairment (14.3%). Ethmoid sinus (67.8%) and nasal cavity (45.4%) were the most common anatomical site of tumor origin, while an extension to the orbit and skull base was registered in 28.7% and 24.5% of cases. Surgery was the main treatment, especially in the form of endoscopic endonasal approach (56.9%), and allowed for gross total resection in 79% of cases. The recurrence rate was 26.2%; three cases of tumor-related death were reported. Median follow-up was 4.6 years., Conclusions: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a rare and unique tumoral entity in terms of biological and clinical behavior. Based on the current knowledge, surgery plays the leading role in treatment, accounting for gross total tumor resection in most cases, allowing for clinical symptom and sign resolution and presenting a low rate of perioperative complications. The type of approach and the aim of surgery should be assessed case by case according to patient and pathology features and the surgeon's experience, as well as the aim of the treatment. Further studies including large surgical series and with long follow-up are required to define prognostic factors and guidelines of treatment for this peculiar pathological entity.

Glioblastoma is the most fatal and common malignant brain tumor, excluding metastasis and with a median survival of approximately one year. While solid tumors benefit from newly approved drugs, immunotherapy, and prevention, none of these scenarios are opening for glioblastoma. The key to unlocking the peculiar features of glioblastoma is observing its molecular and anatomical features tightly entangled with the host's central nervous system (CNS). In June 2024, we searched the PUBMED electronic database. Data collection and analysis were conducted independently by two reviewers. Results: A total of 215 articles were identified, and 192 were excluded based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining 23 were used for collecting divergent molecular pathways and anatomical features of glioblastoma. The analysis of the selected papers revealed a multifaced tumor with extreme variability and cellular reprogramming that are observable within the same patient. All the variability of glioblastoma could be clustered into three pillars to dissect the physiology of the tumor: 1. necrotic core; 2. vascular proliferation; 3. CNS infiltration. These three pillars support glioblastoma survival, with a pivotal role of the neurovascular unit, as supported by the most recent paper published by experts in the field.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that affects upper and lower motor neurons, leading to progressive muscle weakness, spasticity, atrophy, and respiratory failure, with a life expectancy of 2-5 years after symptom onset. In addition to motor symptoms, patients with ALS have a multitude of nonmotor symptoms; in fact, it is currently considered a multisystem disease. The purpose of our narrative review is to evaluate the different types of pain, the correlation between pain and the disease's stages, the pain assessment tools in ALS patients, and the available therapies focusing above all on the benefits of cannabis use. Pain is an underestimated and undertreated symptom that, in the last few years, has received more attention from research because it has a strong impact on the quality of life of these patients. The prevalence of pain is between 15% and 85% of ALS patients, and the studies on the type and intensity of pain are controversial. The absence of pain assessment tools validated in the ALS population and the dissimilar study designs influence the knowledge of ALS pain and consequently the pharmacological therapy. Several studies suggest that ALS is associated with changes in the endocannabinoid system, and the use of cannabis could slow the disease progression due to its neuroprotective action and act on pain, spasticity, cramps, sialorrhea, and depression. Our research has shown high patients' satisfaction with the use of cannabis for the treatment of spasticity and related pain. However, especially due to the ethical problems and the lack of interest of pharmaceutical companies, further studies are needed to ensure the most appropriate care for ALS patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no financial or other conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2024 Vincenzo Pota et al.)