Search

As a potential sequela of cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) significantly impacts the lives of patients and caregivers and places a substantial burden on the healthcare system. With an increasing incidence over time and a cumulative effect on cognition, HE adversely effects quality of life, morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. HE can range from minimal or covert (MHE/CHE) to overt and symptomatic (OHE). HE has profound impacts on the health and wellbeing of patients and their families and caregivers. Effective treatments could improve the quality of life for all those affected. In this article, we discuss the existing treatments for HE and focus on the potential role of albumin in the treatment of HE. Currently approved therapies for HE (lactulose and rifaximin) are focused on decreasing the formation of ammonia in the gastrointestinal tract. Among the many agents with alternative mechanisms being investigated for treatment of HE, albumin has been studied in clinical trials with acute (≤ 3 days), short-term (up to 2 weeks) prolonged (> 2 weeks) and long-term administration (months). Current studies indicate that acute or short-term administration of albumin does not provide significant benefit for patients with OHE. However, there is increasing evidence that prolonged or long-term albumin therapy can help improve cognition in OHE and prevent recurrence. Additional studies are needed to substantiate these positive findings for longer term administration of albumin in HE and to increase our comprehension of the pharmacologic basis of the effects of albumin.

Background: Opioids in step III of the WHO analgesic ladder are the standard of care for treating cancer pain. However, a significant minority of patients do not benefit from therapy. Genetics might play a role in predisposing patients to a good or poor response to opioids. Here, we investigated this issue by conducting a genome‐wide association study (GWAS). Methods: We genotyped 2057 European advanced cancer patients treated with morphine, buprenorphine, fentanyl and oxycodone. We carried out a whole‐genome regression model (using REGENIE software) between genotypes and the opioid response phenotype, defined as a numerical score measuring patient pain intensity. Results: The GWAS identified five non‐coding variants on chromosome 20 with a p‐value <5.0 × 10−8. For all of them, the minor allele was associated with lower pain intensity. These variants were intronic to the PCMTD2 gene and were 200 kbp downstream of OPRL1, the opioid related nociceptin receptor 1. Notably according to the eQTLGen database, these variants act as expression quantitative trait loci, modulating the expression mainly of PCMTD2 but also of OPRL1. Variants in the same chromosomal region were recently reported to be significantly associated with pain intensity in a GWAS conducted in subjects with different chronic pain conditions. Conclusions: Our results support the role of genetics in the opioid response in advanced cancer patients. Further functional analyses are needed to understand the biological mechanism underlying the observed association and lead to the development of individualized pain treatment plans, ultimately improving the quality of life for cancer patients. Significance Statement: This genome‐wide association study on European advanced cancer patients treated with opioids identifies novel regulatory variants on chromosome 20 (near PCMTD2 and OPRL1 genes) associated with pain intensity. These findings enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of opioid response, suggesting new potential markers for opioid efficacy. The study is a significant advancement in pharmacogenomics, providing a robust dataset and new insights into the genetic factors influencing pain intensity, which could lead to personalized cancer pain management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]