Search

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology is characterized by acute and chronic inflammation, demyelination, axonal injury, and neurodegeneration. After decades of research into MS-related degeneration, recent efforts have shifted toward recovery and the prevention of further damage. A key area of focus is the remyelination process, where researchers are studying the effects of pharmacotherapy on myelin repair mechanisms. Multiple compounds are being tested for their potential to foster remyelination in different clinical settings through the application of less or more complex techniques to assess their efficacy. Objective: To review current methods and biomarkers to track myelin regeneration and recovery over time in people with MS (PwMS), with potential implications for promyelinating drug testing. Methods : Narrative review, based on a selection of PubMed articles discussing techniques to measure in vivo myelin repair and functional recovery in PwMS. Results : Non-invasive tools, such as structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), are being implemented to track myelin repair, while other techniques like evoked potentials, functional MRI, and digital markers allow the assessment of functional recovery. These methods, alone or in combination, have been employed to obtain precise biomarkers of remyelination and recovery in various clinical trials on MS. Conclusions : Combining different techniques to identify myelin restoration in MS could yield novel biomarkers, enhancing the accuracy of clinical trial outcomes for remyelinating therapies in PwMS.

Recognizing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and differentiating NMOSD from multiple sclerosis (MS) and other disorders can be challenging yet it is extremely important to prevent misdiagnosis, defined in this review as the incorrect diagnosis of patients who truly have NMOSD, particularly in aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG)-seronegative cases. The heterogeneity of clinical presentations and wide range of differential diagnoses often lead to missed diagnoses of NMOSD. Misapplication of the 2015 NMOSD criteria and misinterpretation of clinical and neuroradiological findings are relevant factors associated with misdiagnosis in clinical practice. Despite the presence of a specific biomarker for NMOSD (AQP4-IgG), misdiagnosis rates have been reported as high as 35%. Studies indicate that misdiagnosed patients often undergo unnecessary prolonged immunotherapy, leading to health risks and increased morbidity. Accurate definitive diagnosis is crucial as long-term outcomes and treatment approaches differ based on the correct diagnosis, and inappropriate immunotherapy can lead to disability in NMOSD patients. This review outlines factors linked to NMOSD misdiagnosis and briefly discusses strategies to reduce misdiagnosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.