Search

Paola Rogliani,1 Gian Marco Manzetti,1 Shima Gholamalishahi,1 Mario Cazzola,1 Luigino Calzetta2 1Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 2Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, ItalyCorrespondence: Paola Rogliani, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Montpellier 1, Rome, 00133, Italy, Email paola.rogliani@uniroma2.itAbstract: Mucus clearance is crucial for airway protection, and its dysfunction leads to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characterized by mucus hypersecretion (MHS) and impaired clearance. MUC5AC and MUC5B mucin proteins are key components of airway mucus, with MUC5AC being particularly responsive to environmental stimuli, making it a potential COPD biomarker. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a mucolytic agent with known effects on mucus viscosity and clearance, but its precise mechanisms in COPD remain unclear. This systematic review evaluated the impact of NAC on MHS in the airways, reporting significant inhibitory effects on MUC5AC and MUC5B gene and protein expression, as well as a reduction in the number of goblet cells. NAC has demonstrated efficacy in vitro and in animal models of MHS, including COPD models, but data on human bronchial tissue are lacking. This systematic review suggests that NAC acts as a mucolytic and a mucoregulator, directly inhibiting mucus secretion and goblet cell hyperplasia. Given the critical role of MHS in COPD progression, exacerbations, and mortality, these findings highlight the potential of NAC as a targeted therapy for hypersecretion COPD phenotypes. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results of this systematic review, even in human bronchial tissue, to provide translatable evidence in clinical settings. Understanding the intimate mechanism of NAC versus MHS regulation may pave the way for more effective treatments targeting airway mucus dysfunction in COPD, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing morbidity and mortality associated with chronic mucus hypersecretion.Keywords: COPD, mucus hypersecretion, N-acetylcysteine, systematic review

Introduction: β-Blockers are essential for cardiovascular disease management but can induce respiratory issues, particularly with non-selective β-blockers. Their safety in asthmatic patients is debated., Objective: This study investigates the link between different classes of β-blockers and the risk of asthma and asthma-like adverse events (AEs) using data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Methods: Asthma-related AEs linked to β-blockers were analyzed from the FAERS database. The risk associated with different β-blocker classes was evaluated through disproportionality analysis using the reporting odds ratio (ROR)., Results: Among 251,145 AEs reported for β-blockers, 4,104 were asthma-related. Selective β 1 -blockers had a higher asthma risk signal (ROR: 1.15) compared to non-selective β-blockers (ROR: 0.90). Dual α- and β-blockers showed the lowest risk (ROR: 0.51). The Vashistha and Kumar classification detailed risk profiles for various β-blockers, highlighting differences even within the same class. Dual α- and β-blockers, hydrophilic, and lipophilic β-blockers posed lower asthma risks, while selective β1-blockers had higher risks regardless of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity., Conclusion: Risk stratification underscores the need for cautious β-blocker selection in asthmatic patients or those predisposed to asthma. The study highlights significant variability in risk among different β-blocker classes, crucial for clinical decisions and patient outcomes. Drugs like esmolol, metoprolol, nebivolol, and nadolol may be safer for asthmatic patients, whereas betaxolol, bisoprolol, timolol, and propranolol should be avoided. Regular respiratory monitoring is crucial for asthmatic patients on β-blockers, starting treatment at low doses and adjusting to minimize bronchoconstriction risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Furthermore, we declare that this manuscript was not funded/sponsored, and no writing assistance was utilised in its production., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Myeloid neoplasms originate from the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, which is driven by the acquisition of somatic genetic mutations. Within these disorders, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are specifically characterized by morphologic abnormalities (dysplasia) and impaired maturation of myeloid precursors (ineffective hematopoiesis), resulting in peripheral blood cytopenia. Several studies have advanced the field of MDS, with a few landmark papers leading to a paradigm shift, opening new avenues of research and enabling a molecular revolution. These seminal papers include the first description of the 5q- syndrome, the identification of somatic mutations of TET2 in myeloid neoplasms, the detection of common pathway mutations in the splicing machinery, and the discovery of clonal hematopoiesis. The somatic genomic landscape of MDS is now well-defined. Genes that are recurrently mutated include epigenetic regulators, as well as genes of RNA splicing machinery, transcription regulation, DNA repair control, cohesin complex, and signal transduction. Furthermore, several disorders with a germline genetic predisposition to MDS have been identified, collectively accounting for up to 15% of all MDS cases. Genomic profiling can significantly improve the diagnostic approach to MDS, allowing the identification of distinct nosologic entities such as SF3B1-mutant or TP53-mutant MDS. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for MDS (IPSS-M) has already proven to be a valuable tool for individualized risk assessment and treatment decisions. In addition, the recently developed molecular taxonomy of MDS will likely facilitate the implementation of precision medicine approaches for these disorders. This will necessitate the establishment of specialized infrastructures within public health systems, involving close collaboration between healthcare institutions, academia, and the life sciences industry.

This review explores the concept of synergy in pharmacology, emphasizing its importance in optimizing treatment outcomes through the combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Synergy, defined as an effect greater than the expected additive effect elicited by individual agents according to specific predictive models, offers a promising approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse events. The historical evolution of synergy research, from ancient civilizations to modern pharmacology, highlights the ongoing quest to understand and harness synergistic interactions. Key concepts, such as concentration-response curves, additive effects, and predictive models, are discussed in detail, emphasizing the need for accurate assessment methods throughout translational drug development. Although various mathematical models exist for synergy analysis, selecting the appropriate model and software tools remains a challenge, necessitating careful consideration of experimental design and data interpretation. Furthermore, this review addresses practical considerations in synergy assessment, including preclinical and clinical approaches, mechanism of action, and statistical analysis. Optimizing synergy requires attention to concentration/dose ratios, target site localization, and timing of drug administration, ensuring that the benefits of combination therapy detected bench-side are translatable into clinical practice. Overall, the review advocates for a systematic approach to synergy assessment, incorporating robust statistical analysis, effective and simplified predictive models, and collaborative efforts across pivotal sectors, such as academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies. By overcoming critical challenges and maximizing therapeutic potential, effective synergy assessment in drug development holds promise for advancing patient care. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Combining drugs with different mechanisms of action for synergistic interactions optimizes treatment efficacy and safety. Accurate interpretation of synergy requires the identification of the expected additive effect. Despite innovative models to predict the additive effect, consensus in drug-drug interactions research is lacking, hindering the bench-to-bedside development of combination therapies. Collaboration among science, industry, and regulation is crucial for advancing combination therapy development, ensuring rigorous application of predictive models in clinical settings., (Copyright © 2024 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Asthma management often includes inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), with additional controllers like long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) for severe cases. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the pharmacological interaction between various concentrations of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UME) in isolated human airways to determine the nature of their interaction, whether synergistic or additive. Medium bronchi and small airways obtained from patients undergoing lobectomy were passively sensitized to mimic asthmatic conditions. The effects of FF and UME, alone and in combination, on airway relaxation were evaluated using histamine-induced contraction and electrical field stimulation. Pharmacological interactions were analyzed using the Bliss Independence theory. Results indicated that FF induced a partial, concentration-dependent relaxation of sensitized airways, while UME induced a larger relaxation in medium bronchi but a weaker effect in small airways. The combination of FF and UME resulted in significantly greater relaxation than either drug alone, demonstrating synergism at high concentrations in medium bronchi but only additive effects in small airways. This study suggests that higher doses of FF might be necessary in a fixed dose combination to achieve optimal synergistic bronchodilation with UME. Future research should focus on clinical trials to confirm these findings and explore the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions, potentially improving personalized asthma therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MGM participated as a faculty member and advisor in scientific meetings and courses under the sponsorship of ABC Farmaceutici, Almirall, AstraZeneca, Chiesi Farmaceutici, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, was a consultant to Chiesi Farmaceutici and GSK, and her department was funded by GSK and Novartis. LC has participated as advisor in scientific meetings under the sponsorship of Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, received nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, received a research grant partially funded by Chiesi Farmaceutici, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Almirall; has been a consultant to ABC Farmaceutici, Edmond Pharma, Zambon, Verona Pharma, and Ockham Biotech; his department was funded by Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Novartis, and Zambon. MC participated as a faculty member and advisor in scientific meetings and courses under the sponsorship of Abdi Ibrahim, Alkem, Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Cipla, Eurodrug, GSK, Glenmark, Lallemand, Mankind Pharma, Menarini Group, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Recipharm, Sanofi, Teva, Verona Pharma and Zambon, and was a consultant to ABC Farmaceutici, AstraZeneca, Chiesi Farmaceutici, GSK, Lallemand, Novartis, Ockham Biotech, Recipharm, Verona Pharma and Zambon. PR has participated as a faculty member and advisor in scientific meetings and courses under the sponsorship of Almirall, AstraZeneca, Biofutura, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini Group, Mundipharma, Novartis, Recipharm, Sanofi, and Zambon, and her department was funded by Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Novartis, and Zambon. CP is a consultant to Eurodrug, Recipharm, Ananda Developments and Microa, and has equity in Verona Pharma. BR, CB, FF and FTG declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Abstract: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic abnormalities of myeloid cells and peripheral cytopenias. Although genetic abnormalities underlie the pathogenesis of these disorders and their heterogeneity, current classifications of MDS rely predominantly on morphology. We performed genomic profiling of 3233 patients with MDS or related disorders to delineate molecular subtypes and define their clinical implications. Gene mutations, copy-number alterations, and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity were derived from targeted sequencing of a 152-gene panel, with abnormalities identified in 91%, 43%, and 11% of patients, respectively. We characterized 16 molecular groups, encompassing 86% of patients, using information from 21 genes, 6 cytogenetic events, and loss of heterozygosity at the TP53 and TET2 loci. Two residual groups defined by negative findings (molecularly not otherwise specified, absence of recurrent drivers) comprised 14% of patients. The groups varied in size from 0.5% to 14% of patients and were associated with distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes. The median bone marrow (BM) blast percentage across groups ranged from 1.5% to 10%, and the median overall survival ranged from 0.9 to 8.2 years. We validated 5 well-characterized entities, added further evidence to support 3 previously reported subsets, and described 8 novel groups. The prognostic influence of BM blasts depended on the genetic subtypes. Within genetic subgroups, therapy-related MDS and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms had comparable clinical and outcome profiles to primary MDS. In conclusion, genetically-derived subgroups of MDS are clinically relevant and might inform future classification schemas and translational therapeutic research., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Asthma and cardiovascular disease (CVD) often co-exist. When a patient has both conditions, management requires an approach that addresses the unique challenges of each condition separately, while also considering their potential interactions. However, specific guidance on the management of asthma in patients with CVD and on the management of CVD in patients with asthma is still lacking. Nevertheless, health care providers need to adopt a comprehensive approach that includes both respiratory and CVD health. The management of CVD in patients with asthma requires a delicate balance between controlling respiratory symptoms and minimising potential cardiovascular (CV) risks. In the absence of specific guidelines for the management of patients with both conditions, the most prudent approach would be to follow established guidelines for each condition independently. Careful selection of asthma medications is essential to avoid exacerbation of CV symptoms. In addition, optimal management of CV risk factors is essential. However, close monitoring of these patients is important as there is evidence that some asthma medications may have adverse effects on CVD and, conversely, that some CVD medications may worsen asthma symptoms. On the other hand, there is also increasing evidence of the potential beneficial effects of asthma medications on CVD and, conversely, that some CVD medications may reduce the severity of asthma symptoms. We aim to elucidate the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of asthma medications in patients with CVD, and the potential pulmonary risks and benefits for patients with asthma who are prescribed CVD medications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Gefapixant, a P2X 3 receptor antagonist, shows considerable potential in managing refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Clinical trials have consistently demonstrated its efficacy in significantly reducing cough frequency and alleviating associated symptoms. However, its adverse effect profile, particularly taste disturbances such as dysgeusia and hypogeusia, the incidence of which is dose-dependent, poses a significant challenge to patient compliance and overall treatment satisfaction., Areas Covered: The authors review the mechanism of action of gefapixant, the dose-dependent nature of its adverse effects and the findings from various clinical trials, including Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 studies. The authors also cover its regulatory status, post-marketing data, and its main competitors., Expert Opinion: Gefapixant represents a significant advancement in treating chronic cough. However, balancing efficacy and tolerability is crucial. Lower effective doses and potential combination therapies may mitigate taste disturbances. Patient education and close monitoring during treatment are also important for optimal outcomes. Further research is needed to refine dosing strategies to minimize side effects while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This research and personalized treatment approaches are key to optimizing gefapixant therapy, ensuring improved management of chronic cough while reducing adverse effects. However, pharmaceutical trials and proposals must be adapted to align with each regulatory body's specific requirements and concerns.

Background : Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, which can be assessed non-invasively through flow-mediated dilation (FMD). In this study, we evaluated the potential impact of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy on FMD of COPD patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods : Medical records of COPD patients undergoing FMD assessment upon admission to our Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit were reviewed in this retrospective post hoc analysis. Results : A total of 46 patients with COPD (median age 71.5 years, 28.3% postmenopausal females) were included in the final analysis. Among these, 27 participants were currently receiving ICS therapy, while 19 were not. At baseline, the two groups showed no difference in the main clinical and functional variables. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in vascular reactivity parameters, with a median FMD of 3.12% (IQR: 2.23-4.45) in ICS users and 3.39% (IQR: 2.45-4.08) in ICS nonusers ( p = 0.544). After PR, a significant improvement in the main rehabilitation and patient-reported outcomes was observed in all groups, with a significant improvement in FMD documented in both patients treated with steroids (from 3.12%; IQR: 2.23-4.45 to 4.77%; IQR: 3.25-5.63, p = 0.022) and in those who were not (from 3.39%; IQR: 2.45-4.08 to 5.04%; IQR: 3.98-6.06, p = 0.005). FMD changes were of comparable magnitude among groups. Conclusions : Our preliminary findings do not indicate a significant impact of medications containing ICS on the endothelial function of COPD patients, suggesting that the potential beneficial effect of PR on this surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk is independent of inhaled therapy.

Introduction: COPD is a leading cause of global mortality, particularly under-recognized and under-diagnosed. In 2020, it was the sixth leading cause of death in the US and has contributed to 4.72% of all-cause mortality (ACM) according to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Factors influencing COPD-related mortality include smoking, aging populations, comorbidities, sarcopenia, physical capacity, and lack of effective treatments., Areas Covered: This review discusses various factors influencing COPD-related mortality and analyzes observational studies and pivotal RCTs evaluating the impact of different therapies on ACM., Expert Opinion: COPD significantly impacts ACM, necessitating effective management strategies. Smoking cessation is crucial in reducing mortality risk. Exacerbation management and comorbidity treatment are essential to improve patient outcomes. Various therapeutic interventions, such as smoking cessation, vaccination, long-term oxygen therapy, and lung volume reduction surgery, have shown benefits in reducing mortality. Pharmacotherapies might reduce the risk of mortality, although the current scientific evidences remain inconclusive. Advances in pharmacological interventions, tailored treatment plans, and physical activity programs are vital. More robust and long-term studies, focusing on real-world data and addressing biases in treatment allocation, are needed to conclusively determine the efficacy of different therapies in reducing ACM in COPD patients.

Abstract: Mutations in UBA1, which are disease-defining for VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, have been reported in patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we define the prevalence and clinical associations of UBA1 mutations in a representative cohort of patients with MDS. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction profiling of a selected cohort of 375 male patients lacking MDS disease-defining mutations or established World Health Organization (WHO) disease classification identified 28 patients (7%) with UBA1 p.M41T/V/L mutations. Using targeted sequencing of UBA1 in a representative MDS cohort (n = 2027), we identified an additional 27 variants in 26 patients (1%), which we classified as likely/pathogenic (n = 12) and of unknown significance (n = 15). Among the total 40 patients with likely/pathogenic variants (2%), all were male and 63% were classified by WHO 2016 criteria as MDS with multilineage dysplasia or MDS with single-lineage dysplasia. Patients had a median of 1 additional myeloid gene mutation, often in TET2 (n = 12), DNMT3A (n = 10), ASXL1 (n = 3), or SF3B1 (n = 3). Retrospective clinical review, where possible, showed that 82% (28/34) UBA1-mutant cases had VEXAS syndrome-associated diagnoses or inflammatory clinical presentation. The prevalence of UBA1 mutations in patients with MDS argues for systematic screening for UBA1 in the management of MDS., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: Modification of the immune system with biologics raises theoretical concerns about the risk of infections but it is still unclear whether currently routinely used biologics in severe asthma may facilitate the development of pneumonia. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab are associated with pneumonia in a real-world setting., Methods: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was performed using adverse event (AE) reports submitted to FAERS from January 2020 to September 30, 2023. MedDRA was used to identify infections and infestations and then pneumonia cases. ROR and PRR were used to measure disproportionality., Results: The percentage of reported cases of pneumonia compared to infections and infestations was highest for mepolizumab (36.8%), followed by omalizumab (32.6%), benralizumab (19.2%) and dupilumab (5.7%). We found a moderate or strong signal for increased risk of pneumonia with mepolizumab (ROR = 3.74, 95%CI 3.50-4.00), omalizumab (ROR = 3.26, 95%CI 3.06-3.49) and benralizumab (ROR = 2.65, 95%CI 2.49-2.83)., Conclusions: Mepolizumab, omalizumab and benralizumab, but not dupilumab, were associated with high odds of reporting pneumonia. Our results represent only potential associations between these biologics and pneumonia but not causality. The nature of the FAERS database is such that the cause of the reported events is uncertain. Therefore, we can only roughly estimate the incidence of AEs by the signal strength (ROR value). Nevertheless, although causality could not be assessed, the signal from our study is interesting. We believe it deserves to be further substantiated by real-world studies with robust designs.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often involves type 1 (T1) inflammation, but 40% of patients have T2 inflammation, which worsens outcomes. Dupilumab, targeting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, shows promise in phase 3 trials. The new NOTUS trial 1 showed effectiveness in reducing exacerbations and improving lung function. However, its predominantly white population limits generalizability. Future research should include diverse populations and assess different therapies combined with dupilumab to improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The investigation of ensifentrine, an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 inhibitor, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance therapy presents a significant clinical interest. Despite promising results from recent Phase III trials, a comprehensive synthesis of its therapeutic efficacy in COPD is lacking. This protocol outlines the first registered systematic review and meta-analysis in PROSPERO to assess the impact of ensifentrine on trough forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV 1 ) and acute exacerbations of COPD. By conducting a rigorous literature search and employing solid methodologies, this endeavour aims to provide robust evidence on the real efficacy of ensifentrine. Anticipated outcomes include a significant improvement in trough FEV 1 and a reduction in AECOPD risk among ensifentrine-treated patients compared to controls, corroborating its bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory properties. The meta-analysis expects to reveal consistent results across different trials, enhancing confidence in the findings. Additionally, subgroup analyses may unveil factors influencing the efficacy of ensifentrine, guiding optimal therapeutic strategies. Overall, this protocol holds the potential to inform clinical practice and regulatory decisions, positioning ensifentrine as a valuable addition to COPD management., Competing Interests: No conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), originally developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, have attracted attention for their potential therapeutic benefits in asthma due to their anti-inflammatory properties and effects on airway smooth muscle function. However, concerns have been raised about the possibility of GLP1RAs inducing or exacerbating asthma symptoms., Methods: We reviewed data from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) adverse event (AE) reporting system (FAERS) to examine reports of cases of asthma observed in the real-world during treatment with GLP1RAs., Results: Analysis of the FAERS reporting system database has shown that certain GLP1RAs, particularly exenatide, semaglutide and liraglutide, were associated with a higher proportion of respiratory AEs, particularly asthma or asthma-like events. This association was statistically significant at least for semaglutide and liraglutide. Serious asthma-related events and deaths were also reported, with exenatide having the highest proportion of deaths., Conclusions: The reasons for the observed differences in the AE profiles of the GLP1RAs remain unclear and may involve various factors such as pharmacological properties, patient characteristics and reporting biases. The complex interplay between the therapeutic benefits of GLP1RAs and the potential respiratory risks requires careful monitoring by clinicians, underpinned by ongoing research efforts to improve patient care and safety.

Introduction: In the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inhalation therapy plays a pivotal role. However, clinicians often face the dilemma of choosing between single and multiple inhaler therapies for their patients. This choice is critical because it can affect treatment efficacy, patient adherence, and overall disease management., Areas Covered: This article examines the advantages and factors to be taken into consideration when selecting between single and multiple inhaler therapies for COPD., Expert Opinion: Both single and multiple inhaler therapies must be considered in COPD management. While single inhaler therapy offers simplicity and convenience, multiple inhaler therapy provides greater flexibility and customization. Clinicians must carefully evaluate individual patient needs and preferences to determine the most appropriate inhaler therapy regimen. Through personalized treatment approaches and shared decision-making, clinicians can optimize COPD management and improve patient well-being. Nevertheless, further research is required to compare the effectiveness of single versus multiple inhaler strategies through rigorous clinical trials, free from industry bias, to determine the optimal inhaler strategy. Smart inhaler technology appears to have the potential to enhance adherence and personalized management, but the relative merits of smart inhalers in single inhaler regimens versus multiple inhaler regimens remain to be determined.

Introduction: The safety of β 2 -AR antagonists in the treatment of patients with COPD continues to be a topic of research and discussion within the medical community. Emerging evidence suggests potentially benefits in the management of this complex respiratory condition. However, antagonists that display a preference for β 2 -AR over β 1 -AR present a complex therapeutic challenge in COPD management, necessitating an understanding of differences in their pharmacological profiles and clinical implications., Areas Covered: An overview of the mechanisms of action of β 2 -AR antagonists and their potential impact on respiratory function, their pharmacological interactions, clinical implications, and future perspectives in COPD., Expert Opinion: β-Blockers have the potential to become a versatile class of therapeutic agents with benefits beyond their original cardiovascular use. However, the one-size-fits-all approach of prescribing β-blockers regardless of their receptor selectivity to COPD patients with concomitant heart disease may not be appropriate. Instead, it is advisable to develop an individualized treatment strategy based on a thorough assessment of the patient's overall health. The use of non selective β 2 -AR antagonists, functioning as inverse agonists at β 2 -ARs, has garnered interest and debate, but further research efforts should focus on elucidating the optimal use of β-AR antagonists in COPD, balancing cardiovascular benefits with potential respiratory risks to enhance outcomes and quality of life for individuals living with this debilitating respiratory condition.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has traditionally been considered the archetype of progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs), but several other f-ILDs can also manifest a progressive phenotype. Integrating genomic signatures into clinical practice for f-ILD patients may help to identify patients predisposed to a progressive phenotype. In addition to the risk of progressive pulmonary fibrosis, there is a growing body of literature examining how pharmacogenomics influences treatment response, particularly regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of antifibrotic and immunomodulatory agents. In this narrative review, we discuss current studies in IPF and other forms of pulmonary fibrosis, including systemic autoimmune disorders associated ILDs, sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. We also provide insights into the future direction of research in this complex field.

The sirtuin family is a heterogeneous group of proteins that play a critical role in many cellular activities. Several degenerative diseases have recently been linked to aberrant sirtuin expression and activity because of the involvement of sirtuins in maintaining cell longevity and their putative antiaging function. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis associated with systemic autoimmune disorders are severe diseases characterized by premature and accelerated exhaustion and failure of alveolar type II cells combined with aberrant activation of fibroblast proliferative pathways leading to dramatic destruction of lung architecture. The mechanisms underlying alveolar type II cell exhaustion in these disorders are not fully understood. In this review, we have focused on the role of sirtuins in the pathogenesis of idiopathic and secondary pulmonary fibrosis and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a debilitating and progressive lung disease of unknown aetiology, characterized by the relentless deposition of fibrotic tissue. Biomarkers may play a pivotal role as indicators of disease presence, progression, and treatment response. Sirtuins, a family of enzymes with ADP ribosyltransferase or deacetylase activity, have been implicated in several diseases, including pulmonary fibrosis., Methods: A cross-sectional, prospective, observational single-center study was conducted to investigate the potential role of serum SIRTs levels as biomarkers in patients with IPF. Demographic, clinical, and functional data and serological samples were collected from 34 patients with IPF followed at the Interstital Lung and Rare Diseases Outpatient Clinic of the Vanvitelli Pneumology Clinic, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy and from 19 age-matched controls., Results: Serum SIRT-1 levels were significantly reduced in IPF patients compared to controls (median IPF 667 [435-858] pg/mL versus controls 925 [794-1173] pg/mL; p < 0.001 ). In contrast, serum SIRT-3 levels were significantly increased in IPF patients compared to controls (median IPF 338 [230-500] pg/mL versus controls 154 [99.8-246] pg/mL; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in serum SIRT-6 and SIRT-7 levels between IPF and controls. In addition, we found a significant positive correlation between SIRT-1 and lung function parameters such as FEV 1 % (ϱ=0.417;p = 0.016), FVC% (ϱ=0.449;p = 0.009) and DL CO % (ϱ=0.393;p = 0.024), while a significant negative correlation was demonstrated between SIR-1 and GAP score, demonstrating a significant reduction in SIRT-1 in advanced Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) stages 2-3 compared to GAP stage 1 (p = 0.008)., Conclusions: This prospective, cross-sectional study showed that SIRT-1 was associated with lung function and IPF severity and that both SIRT-1 and SIRT-3 could be considered as potential biomarkers of IPF, whereas SIRT-6 and SIRT-7 were not associated with IPF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In asthma, inflammation affects both the proximal and distal airways and can cause significant hyperinflation, which is thought to be a major cause of dyspnea., Methods: This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the effect of three months of treatment with different biologic drugs (benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) on pulmonary hyperinflation in a cohort of patients with severe asthma already receiving regular triple inhaled therapy. Changes in RV, RV/TLC ratio, FRC and FRC/TLC ratio were the primary efficacy measures. Secondary outcomes included FEV 1 , FVC, FEV 1 /FVC ratio, IC, IC/TLC ratio, asthma control test, the percentage of eosinophils in the blood and fractional F ENO ., Results: Benralizumab led to significant changes (p < 0.001) in RV, RV/TLC, FRC, and FRC/TLC. Dupilumab demonstrated a notable reduction in RV (p = 0.017) and RV/TLC (p = 0.002), but the decreases in FRC and FRC/TLC were merely numerical and not as pronounced as those induced by benralizumab. Omalizumab's positive impact on RV (p = 0.057) and RV/TLC (p = 0.085), as well as FRC (p = 0.202) and FRC/TLC (p = 0.096), was also predominantly numerical, with a tendency towards efficacy, albeit excluding the effect on FRC. Treatment with biologics resulted in improvements in all other lung function parameters assessed and a decrease in F ENO levels., Conclusion: This study, although limited by small sample size, lack of a placebo control, and unbalanced group sizes, suggests that biological agents are effective in reducing lung hyperinflation even after a relatively short treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS)., Methods: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio., Results: Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports., Conclusion: Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The pharmacotherapy of asthma is a dynamic process that changes as our knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology and treatment of this disease continues to evolve. This implies the need for continuous revision of the recommendations of asthma guidelines and strategies., Areas Covered: This review summarizes the latest key practical information on the pharmacological management of asthma in adults. We provide the background to the 2023 update of the GINA strategy report, focusing on changes and discussing areas of uncertainty. We review current and emerging pharmacotherapy for uncontrolled asthma, including synthetic agents and new biologics, and provide expert perspectives and opinions on the treatment of uncontrolled asthma., Expert Opinion: The current pharmacological treatment of asthma, based on a step-by-step, control-based approach, with ICSs, LABAs and LAMAs being the mainstay generally provides good symptom control. Biologic therapies are often effective in treating T2 high severe asthma. However, there is still room for improvement, such as the discovery of new molecules that specifically target chronic inflammation and, most importantly, the ability to provide solutions to the various areas of uncertainty that still exist. Also finding solutions to improve the accessibility and affordability of rescue ICS in resource-constrained settings is critical.

Isolated airway smooth muscle has been extensively investigated since 1840 to understand the pharmacology of airway diseases. There has often been poor predictability from murine experiments to drugs evaluated in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the use of isolated human airways represents a sensible strategy to optimise the development of innovative molecules for the treatment of respiratory diseases. This review aims to provide updated evidence on the current uses of isolated human airways in validated in vitro methods to investigate drugs in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders. This review also provides historical notes on the pioneering pharmacological research on isolated human airway tissues, the key differences between human and animal airways, as well as the pivotal differences between human medium bronchi and small airways. Experiments carried out with isolated human bronchial tissues in vitro and ex vivo replicate many of the main anatomical, pathophysiological, mechanical and immunological characteristics of patients with asthma or COPD. In vitro models of asthma and COPD using isolated human airways can provide information that is directly translatable into humans with obstructive lung diseases. Regardless of the technique used to investigate drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders (i.e., isolated organ bath systems, videomicroscopy and wire myography), the most limiting factors to produce high-quality and repeatable data remain closely tied to the manual skills of the researcher conducting experiments and the availability of suitable tissue., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Airway epithelial cells (AECs) are a major component of local airway immune responses. Direct effects of type 2 cytokines on AECs are implicated in type 2 asthma, which is driven by epithelial-derived cytokines and leads to airway obstruction. However, evidence suggests that restoring epithelial health may attenuate asthmatic features., Methods: We investigated the effects of passive sensitisation on IL-5, NF-κB, HDAC-2, ACh, and ChAT in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpCs) and the effects of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UME) alone and in combination on these responses., Results: IL-5 and NF-κB levels were increased, and that of HDAC-2 reduced in sensitised HEBpCs. Pretreatment with FF reversed the effects of passive sensitisation by concentration-dependent reduction of IL-5, resulting in decreased NF-κB levels and restored HDAC-2 activity. Addition of UME enhanced these effects. Sensitized HEBpCs also exhibited higher ACh and ChAT levels. Pretreatment with UME significantly reduced ACh levels, and addition of FF caused a further small reduction., Conclusion: This study confirmed that passive sensitisation of AECs results in an inflammatory response with increased levels of IL-5 and NF-κB, reduced levels of HDAC-2, and higher levels of ACh and ChAT compared to normal cells. Combining FF and UME was found to be more effective in reducing IL-5, NF-κB, and ACh and restoring HDAC-2 compared to the individual components. This finding supports adding a LAMA to established ICS/LABA treatment in asthma and suggests the possibility of using an ICS/LAMA combination when needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are global health challenges leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. While existing guidelines emphasize evidence-based treatments, the potential therapeutic role of thermal water (TW) inhalation remains under-investigated., Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA-P guidelines and sought to evaluate the impact of TW in asthma and COPD. A thorough literature search, performed up to May 2023, encompassed in vitro, in vivo, randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-RCT, and observational studies., Results: The review included 12 studies reporting different findings. In vitro studies suggested TW could enhance antioxidant capacity and cell proliferation. In a murine model of non-atopic asthma, TW inhalation reduced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation. RCTs in COPD patients indicated mixed effects, including improved quality of life, reduced airway oxidant stress, and enhanced exercise tolerance. Asthma patients exposed to water aerosols exhibited improved lung function and reduced airway inflammation. Non-RCTs showed improved lung function and antioxidant activity after TW therapy. Additionally, observational studies reported enhanced lung function and reduced airway inflammation., Conclusion: The current evidence suggests potential benefits of TW therapy in asthma and COPD. However, limited high-quality RCTs and concerns regarding occupational TW exposure necessitate further investigation. While TW therapy offers a non-invasive treatment, its therapeutic potential still needs definitive demonstration. Future research should therefore prioritize well-designed RCTs to thoroughly establish the efficacy and safety of TW as a potential therapeutic intervention for asthma and COPD.

Asthma is a complex respiratory condition characterized by chronic airway inflammation and variable expiratory airflow limitation, affecting millions globally. Among athletes, particularly those competing at elite levels, the prevalence of respiratory conditions is notably heightened, varying between 20% and 70% across specific sports. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common issue among athletes, impacting their performance and well-being. The prevalence rates vary based on the sport, training environment, and genetics. Exercise is a known trigger for asthma, but paradoxically, it can also improve pulmonary function and alleviate EIB severity. However, athletes' asthma phenotypes differ, leading to varied responses to medications and challenges in management. The unique aspects in athletes include heightened airway sensitivity, allergen, pollutant exposure, and temperature variations. This review addresses EIB in athletes, focusing on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. The pathogenesis of EIB involves complex interactions between physiological and environmental factors. Airway dehydration and cooling are key mechanisms, leading to osmotic and thermal theories. Airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness are common factors. Elite athletes often exhibit distinct inflammatory responses and heightened airway sensitivity, influenced by sport type, training, and environment. Swimming and certain sports pose higher EIB risks, with chlorine exposure in pools being a notable factor. Immune responses, lung function changes, and individual variations contribute to EIB in athletes. Diagnosing EIB in athletes requires objective testing, as baseline lung function tests can yield normal results. Both EIB with asthma (EIBA) and without asthma (EIBwA) must be considered. Exercise and indirect bronchoprovocation tests provide reliable diagnoses. In athletes, exercise tests offer effectiveness in diagnosing EIB. Spirometry and bronchodilation tests are standard approaches, but the diagnostic emphasis is shifting toward provocation tests. Despite its challenges, achieving an optimal diagnosis of EIA constitutes the cornerstone for effective management, leading to improved performance, reduced risk of complications, and enhanced quality of life. The management of EIB in athletes aligns with the general principles for symptom control, prevention, and reducing complications. Non-pharmacological approaches, including trigger avoidance and warming up, are essential. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of asthma therapy in athletes. Short-acting beta agonists (SABA) are discouraged as sole treatments. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) and mast cell stabilizing agents (MCSA) are potential options. Optimal management improves the athletes' quality of life and allows them to pursue competitive sports effectively.