Search

Background Long-term antidepressant (AD) use, much longer than recommended by guidelines, may cause harms and generate unnecessary costs. Community pharmacists have frequent contact with AD users and advise them on appropriate and safe medication use. GPs recognised pharmacists as potential sources of additional support for the AD discontinuation process, but there is a lack of knowledge about pharmacists’ views. Aim To explore pharmacists’ perspectives on discontinuing long-term use of ADs and supporting patients during the discontinuation process and their barriers and facilitators. Method Qualitative study in Belgian pharmacists. The authors conducted 14 semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were analysed thematically. Results The first theme ‘Antidepressants at the pharmacy: a persistent taboo’ described the challenges pharmacists encounter in initiating discussions with patients about their ADs and mental health, and the persistent taboo around ADs at pharmacies. Second, pharmacists were concerned about the risks associated with AD discontinuation but recognise that harm from continuing ADs may outweigh concerns. Third, although pharmacists can be a starting point for discontinuation, they hesitate to do this and question if this is their role. They prefer that GPs have this responsibility. Conclusion Deprescribing long-term ADs is a challenging concept for pharmacists, especially when there is no patient request. The taboo around ADs and the fear of relapse of symptoms in a stable patient are important barriers for pharmacists when considering discontinuation. Pharmacist education and confidence-building is essential to involve the pharmacist in the discontinuation process. Findings also highlight a strong need for multidisciplinary collaboration and agreements with GPs to reduce unnecessary antidepressant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rational prescribing is essential for the quality of health care. However, many final-year medical students and junior doctors lack prescribing competence to perform this task. The availability of a list of medicines that a junior doctor working in Europe should be able to independently prescribe safely and effectively without supervision could support and harmonize teaching and training in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) in Europe. Therefore, our aim was to achieve consensus on such a list of medicines that are widely accessible in Europe. For this, we used a modified Delphi study method consisting of three parts. In part one, we created an initial list based on a literature search. In part two, a group of 64 coordinators in CPT education, selected via the Network of Teachers in Pharmacotherapy of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, evaluated the accessibility of each medicine in his or her country, and provided a diverse group of experts willing to participate in the Delphi part. In part three, 463 experts from 24 European countries were invited to participate in a 2-round Delphi study. In total, 187 experts (40%) from 24 countries completed both rounds and evaluated 416 medicines, 98 of which were included in the final list. The top three Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code groups were (1) cardiovascular system (n = 23), (2) anti-infective (n = 21), and (3) musculoskeletal system (n = 11). This European List of Key Medicines for Medical Education could be a starting point for country-specific lists and could be used for the training and assessment of CPT., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)