1. Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings.
- Author
-
BOYD, CHRISTINA L., COLLINS JR., PAUL M., and RINGHAND, LORI A.
- Subjects
- *
SELECTION & appointment of U.S. Supreme Court justices , *RACISM , *PEOPLE of color , *SEX discrimination , *LEGISLATIVE hearings - Abstract
In this research letter, we examine whether gender and racial bias affect interruption rates at one of the most visible events in American politics: US Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Using original data from 1939 to 2022, we find that male and white participants are more likely to interrupt women and person of color speakers, respectively, relative to male and white speakers. This finding holds for both senators and nominees as interrupters. Our results provide evidence that biased interruptive behavior occurs in even the most public and salient of political settings and that it can be mitigated (or intensified) by shared (or opposite) partisanship among speaking pairs. We also find interruption inequalities are not isolated to women as the interrupted, revealing that people of color in political and legal settings are subject to heightened rates of interruptions as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF