Search

Background: In the absence of direct evidence supporting how to use nasal endoscopy findings to judge chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control, experts' practice patterns could provide guidance., Methodology: Participants consisted of a diverse group of twenty-nine rhinologists. Participants were presented with every possible combination of bilateral nasal endoscopy findings represented by the modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK; range: 0-12) endoscopic scoring system and Nasal Polyp Score (NPS; range: 0-8). Reflecting the practical consequence of CRS disease control assessment, participants were asked whether they would consider CRS treatment escalation based on each scenario in the absence of any CRS symptoms, and how strongly they considered escalating therapy. The same scenarios were then presented in the context of 1 burdensome CRS symptom and participants again were asked whether they would consider treatment escalation., Results: The median threshold total MLK score for considering treatment escalation was ≥4 and 75.9% of participants' MLK thresholds were within 1 point of 4. The median threshold total NPS for considering treatment escalation was ≥3 and 62.5% of participants' NPS thresholds were within 1 point of 3. Endoscopy score thresholds decreased in the presence of 1 burdensome symptom and generally increased when requiring stronger affirmation for considering CRS treatment escalation., Conclusion: Reflecting the practice patterns of a diverse group of rhinologists, MLK score ≥4 or NPS ≥3 may serve as thresholds for considering CRS treatment escalation. Alternatively, MLK score.

Background: The objective of this study was to identify how - and to what extent - overall symptom severity (OSS) score reflects individual chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms and whether it can be measured using alternatives to the standard visual analog scale (VAS)., Methods: CRS patients from four sites across three continents rated their OSS scores, severities of nasal obstruction, nasal drainage, decreased sense of smell, facial pain/pressure and sleep disturbance using a standard VAS, VAS with labeled tick marks at every 1 centimeter, and by writing down their OSS on a scale of 0 - 100 (which was divided by 10), all of which lead to severity scores ranging from 0 - 10 in 0.1 intervals. Quality of life was measured using the SNOT-22 and EQ-5D VAS., Results: In 311 CRS patients, OSS score was significantly correlated with SNOT-22 and EQ-5D VAS. OSS score was most greatly associated with the mean of all individual symptom severity scores. From individual CRS symptoms, OSS was most greatly associated with nasal obstruction followed by nasal drainage and facial pain/pressure severities. These results held true for participants with and without nasal polyps. Measurement of OSS and individual symptom severity scores using a standard VAS, tick-marked VAS, and write-in option had near-perfect consistency., Conclusions: We demonstrate for the first time that OSS largely reflects the mean of individual CRS symptom severities, although OSS is=== most weighted by nasal obstruction severity. OSS and individual symptom severity scores can be measured using a standard VAS, tick-marked VAS or write-in prompt with near-perfect consistency.

Objectives: Recently, a set of consensus criteria and near-consensus criteria for the evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control was identified by an international multidisciplinary panel of key stakeholders. The objective of this study is to evaluate patient perspectives on these disease control criteria., Methods: This is a qualitative phenomenological study using constant comparative methodology. Twenty-one one-on-one interviews, ranging from 6 to 15 min and based on a standardized semi-structured script, with CRS patients from diverse backgrounds were performed. The authors analyzed transcripts of the interviews to identify recurrent themes in patient responses. Conclusions were drawn based on these themes., Results: All participants agreed with the consensus criteria (overall symptom severity, nasal obstruction severity, patients' self-assessed CRS control, and need for CRS-related oral corticosteroids), and most participants agreed with near-consensus criteria (nasal endoscopy, smell loss and nasal drainage severities, impairment of day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life) identified by the international multidisciplinary panel. Some patients disagreed with inclusion of smell loss due to common etiologies-such as post-viral or iatrogenic causes-that would not necessarily be an indicator of active sinonasal inflammation. One theme that emerged was the need for a facial pain/pressure criterion to be added., Conclusions: CRS patients overwhelmingly affirmed recently described consensus and near-consensus criteria for CRS disease control with the caveat that a question asking about facial pain/pressure should be included as well. Recently, identified consensus criteria for CRS disease control should be interpreted within the context of patient perspectives., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.)

Background: Overall symptom severity (OSS) and patient-reported chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) control are global measures of CRS identified as consensus, essential criteria for CRS disease control assessment. We sought to determine the functional relationship between these two metrics., Methods: Using an international multicenter mixed-methods design, 260 CRS patients were recruited. OSS score was measured using a visual analog scale. Patient-reported CRS control was measured as "controlled," "partly controlled," and "uncontrolled." Twelve participants underwent semi-structured interviews to discuss OSS and patient-reported CRS control., Results: The majority of interviewed participants felt OSS and patient-reported CRS control measured different constructs-while OSS only measured symptoms, patient-reported CRS control was more global, including not only symptom severity but also concepts such as medication usage, activity impairment, and exacerbations. Nevertheless, OSS score was strongly correlated with (ρ = 0.67, p < 0.001) and highly predictive of patient-reported CRS control. OSS score of >4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-4.2) had 74.7% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as not controlled. OSS score of >6.6 (95% CI: 4.1-7.1) had 77.0% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as uncontrolled. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score was also predictive of patient-reported CRS disease control but OSS was significantly more predictive., Conclusions: Patients conceptually view patient-reported CRS control as a more global measure that subsumes OSS. Quantitatively, however, OSS is highly correlated with patient-reported CRS control, possibly reflecting their redundancy. For ease of use, we recommend patient-reported CRS control be reflected by OSS <4 for controlled, 4 ≤ OSS < 7 for partly controlled, and OSS ≥7 for uncontrolled CRS., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society.)