Search

Background and Objectives: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <10 is unclear because this subpopulation has been substantially excluded from large clinical trials. The aim of our study was to determine whether MT ± IV thrombolysis (IVT) improves functional outcomes compared with IVT alone in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score <10., Methods: We emulated a hypothetical trial including adult patients with BAO, a baseline NIHSS score <10, and prestroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-2, comparing MT (±IVT) with IVT alone. We acquired data from patients receiving MT (±IVT) within 24 hours of onset from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke and data from patients treated only with IVT within 9 hours of symptom onset from the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register, from 2011 until 2021. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted for prespecified covariates to weight each individual's contribution to the outcome. The primary outcome was 90-day mRS scores 0-2. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS scores 0-1, 90-day mRS scores 4-5, mortality at 90 days, in-hospital death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage., Results: Among the 764 patients recruited from the 2 databases (477 men [62.4%]; mean age [±SD] 67.88 [±13.9] years), 410 (53.7%) received MT±IVT and 354 (46.3%) only IVT. After applying IPW, our population was composed of 710 MT and 707 IVT patients. Of these, 454 MT-treated (63.9%) and 383 IVT-treated (54.2%) patients had a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.56 [95% CI 1.04-2.03]). MT was also associated with a higher rate of mRS scores 0-1 (aOR 2.01 [95% CI 1.37-2.95]) and a lower rate of in-hospital death (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.25-0.78]). Among the subgroups tested, MT had a larger effect on 90-day mRS scores 0-2 for patients with NIHSS scores 6-9 than for patients with a NIHSS score <6 ( p for interaction 0.02)., Discussion: In a large-scale target trial emulation on patients with stroke from BAO and a NIHSS score <10, MT was associated with better functional outcomes compared with IVT alone. Further research is needed to confirm the benefit of MT in patients with a NIHSS score <6., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that MT ± intravenous thrombolysis is associated with better 90-day functional outcomes in patients with BAO and a NIHSS score < 10 compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone.

Background: According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h, which are classified as Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke., Methods: This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA-that is, those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h-who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD 2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days., Results: We included 517 patients-324 (62.7%) male-with a median (interquartile range-IQR) age of 74 (IQR = 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD 2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before ( p  = 0.178) and after matching ( p  = 0.518)., Conclusions: In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.Z. reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. R.O. reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. S.S. reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. DT reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population., Methods: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and three prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24 h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage., Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% vs. 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%-6.1%); p = 0.047, risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07); p = 0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% vs. 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI: 6.4%-13.4%); p < 0.001, risk ratio 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37-1.97); p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and those who received antiplatelet loading dose., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill the criteria of landmark large clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring or Advisory Board; he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. SS reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Sex may impact clinical outcomes in patients with stroke treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We aimed to investigate the sex differences in the short-term outcomes of DAPT within a real-world population of patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack., Methods: We performed a propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric cohort study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]) by including patients with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-10) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of transient ischemic attack, presence of diabetes [ABCD 2 ] ≥4) who initiated DAPT within 48 hours of symptom onset. The primary effectiveness outcome was the 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events. The secondary effectiveness outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal shift, vascular and all-cause mortality, and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcomes included the 90-day risk of moderate-to-severe and any bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 24-hour hemorrhagic transformation. Outcomes were compared between sexes using Cox and generalized ordinal logistic regression analyses, along with calculating risk differences and ratios., Results: From 2278 patients in the READAPT study cohort, we included 1643 mild-to-moderate strokes or high-risk transient ischemic attacks treated with DAPT (mean age, 69.8±12.0 years; 34.3% women). We matched 531 women and men. The 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events was significantly lower among women than men (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28-0.99]; P =0.039). There were no significant differences in secondary effectiveness outcomes. The 90-day risk of safety outcomes was extremely low and did not differ between women and men (moderate-to-severe bleedings: 0.4% versus 0.8%; P =0.413; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: 0.2% versus 0.4%; P =0.563). Subgroup analysis for primary effectiveness outcome showed a lower 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events among women aged <50 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0 to 5, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score <2, large artery atherosclerosis cause, and no diabetes., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that women with noncardioembolic mild-to-moderate stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack treated with DAPT may have lower short-term risk of recurrent ischemic events than men. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind potential sex-based differences in outcomes after DAPT use., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Background and Purpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved the efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed at evaluating effectiveness and safety of short-term DAPT in real-world, where treatment use is broader than in RCTs., Methods: READAPT (REAl-life study on short-term Dual Antiplatelet treatment in Patients with ischemic stroke or Transient ischemic attack) (NCT05476081) was an observational multicenter real-world study with a 90-day follow-up. We included patients aged 18+ receiving short-term DAPT soon after ischemic stroke or TIA. No stringent NIHSS and ABCD 2 score cut-offs were applied but adherence to guidelines was recommended. Primary effectiveness outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death due to vascular causes, primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the type of ischemic and hemorrhagic events, disability, cause of death, and compliance to treatment., Results: We included 1920 patients; 69.9% started DAPT after an ischemic stroke; only 8.9% strictly followed entry criteria or procedures of RCTs. Primary effectiveness outcome occurred in 3.9% and primary safety outcome in 0.6% of cases. In total, 3.3% cerebrovascular ischemic recurrences occurred, 0.2% intracerebral hemorrhages, and 2.7% bleedings; 0.2% of patients died due to vascular causes. Patients with NIHSS score ⩽5 and those without acute lesions at neuroimaging had significantly higher primary effectiveness outcomes than their counterparts. Additionally, DAPT start >24 h after symptom onset was associated with a lower likelihood of bleeding., Conclusions: In real-world, most of the patients who receive DAPT after an ischemic stroke or a TIA do not follow RCTs entry criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, short-term DAPT remains effective and safe in this population. No safety concerns are raised in patients with low-risk TIA, more severe stroke, and delayed treatment start., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, Bayer, and Astra Zeneca; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports compensations from Novartis and Allergan, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, SS reports compensations from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila. MPa reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc. DT reports compensation from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Data on safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in older patients are limited and controversial, and people aged 80 or older were under-represented in randomized trials. Our aim was to assess EVT effect for ischemic stroke patients aged ⩾80 at a nationwide level., Patients and Methods: The cohort included stroke patients undergoing EVT from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS). Patients were a priori divided into younger and older groups (<80 vs ⩾80). Primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS, 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), successful reperfusion, EVT abortion. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between age groups for baseline features, functional status, stroke severity and neuroradiological features. Logistic regression was implemented to test the weight of age group on the predefined outcomes., Results: Overall, 5872 individuals (1:1 matching, n  = 2936 aged ⩾80 vs n  = 2936 < 80) were matched from 13,922 records. In ⩾80 group 34.1% had good functional outcome, vs 51.2% in <80 group (absolute difference = -17.1%, p  < 0.001), with a 4.4% excess in EVT abortion. Age ⩾80 was a negative independent predictor of good functional outcome (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3-0.5), but had no impact on sICH., Discussion and Conclusion: Age ⩾80 years represents a consistent predictor of worse functional outcome, independently from successful reperfusion and sICH. Cost-effectiveness studies are needed for tailored and implement sustainable care, and research should focus on strategies to improve functional outcome in older age patient groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MR declares support for educational activities from CLS-Behring and PRESTIGE-AF trial. SN declares consulting fees from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Stryker, and Balt. MC declares consultancy or advisory board fees or speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer/Bristol Meyer Squibb and Daiichi Sankyo. AZ received speaker and consultation fees from Alexion, CLS-Behring, Boehringer-Ingelheim. All the other authors report no disclosures.

Background: The outcomes of minor ischemic stroke resulting from small artery occlusion (SAO-MIS) have not yet been characterized after dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) has become the standard of care. We provided updated figures on the short-term prognosis of SAO-MIS treated with early short-term DAPT and compared the outcomes of SAO-MIS versus non-SAO-MIS patients., Methods: This is a prespecified sub-analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT, NCT05476081) including patients with minor (NIHSS≤5) non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke treated with DAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of 90-day symptomatic ischemic stroke or major cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were the 90-day ordinal distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, 90-day excellent functional outcome (mRS of 0 to 1), and 24-h early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes were 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe and any bleedings. All outcomes were compared between SAO-MIS and non-SAO-MIS patients., Results: We included 678 MIS, of whom 253 (37.3 %) were SAO-related. At 90 days, 3 patients with SAO-MIS had primary outcome (1.2 % [95 % CI 0.2 %-3.5 %]), which were all SAO-related ischemic strokes. For the secondary outcomes, most SAO-MIS patients (n = 191, 75.5 %) had 90-day excellent functional outcome and 12 had 24-h END (4.7 % [95 % CI 2.5 %-8.3 %]). Referring to safety outcomes, 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage occurred only in one patient with SAO-MIS (0.4 % [95 % CI 0.0 %- 2.2 %]). Compared to non-SAO-MIS, the 90-day risk of recurrent vascular events was significantly lower among SAO-MIS (aHR 0.24 [95 % CI 0.08-0.68]; p = 0.007), while there were not significant differences in other secondary outcomes, nor in the risk of safety events., Conclusions: Our findings show overall favorable short-term prognosis after SAO-MIS treated with DAPT. Future studies should investigate factors associated with residual stroke risk and long-term outcomes of SAO-MIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Andrea Zini reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. Raffaele Ornello reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Simona Sacco reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by University of L'Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. Maurizio Paciaroni reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. Danilo Toni reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite successful recanalization after Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT), approximately 25 % of patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) due to Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) show unfavorable clinical outcomes, namely Futile Recanalization (FR). We aimed to use a Machine Learning (ML) Non-Contrast brain CT (NCCT) imaging predictive model to identify FR in patients undergoing MT., Materials & Methods: Between July 2022 and December 2022, 70 consecutive patients with LVO undergoing a complete recanalization (eTICI 3) with MT within 8 h from onset at our Centre were analyzed. Two NCCT images per patient of middle cerebral artery vascular territory and patients' clinical characteristics were classified by the presence of ischemic features on 24 h NCCT after MT. Each slice was segmented with "Mazda" software ver.4.6 by placing a Region Of Interest (ROI) on the whole brain by two radiologists in consensus. A total of 381 features were extracted for each slice. The dataset was split into train and test set with a 70:30 ratio., Results: Eleven classification models were trained. An Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) model was obtained by averaging the predictions of models with accuracy on a test set >70 %, with and without patients' clinical characteristics. The EML model combined with clinical data showed an accuracy of 0.76, a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.69 with a NPV of 0.90, a PPV of 0.64, with AUC of 0.84., Conclusion: NCCT and ML analysis shows promise in predicting FR after complete recanalization following MT in AIS patients. Larger studies are required to confirm these preliminary results., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was found to be beneficial in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior tandem occlusion (a-TO). Instead, little is known about the effectiveness of MT in stroke patients with posterior tandem occlusion (p-TO). We aimed to compare MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data of patients registered in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke (IRETAS) who were treated with MT within 24 h from last known well time for acute ischemic stroke with p-TO (n = 275) or a-TO (n = 1853)., Results: After adjustment for unbalanced pre-procedure variables (year 2015-2021, age, sex, NIHSS score, ASPECTS, and time strata for puncture groin) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, p-TO was significantly associated with lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.415, 95% CI 0.268-0.644) and with higher risk of death (OR 2.813, 95% CI 2.080-3.805) at 3 months. After adjustment for unbalanced procedural and post-procedure variables (IVT, general anesthesia, TICI 3, and 24-h HT) and pre-stroke mRS score as pre-defined predictor, association between p-TO and lower probability of mRS score 0-2 (OR 0.444, 95% CI 0.304-0.649) and association between p-TO and with higher risk of death (OR 2.971, 95% CI 1.993-4.429) remained significant., Conclusions: MT within 24 h from last known well time in ischemic stroke patients with p-TO versus a-TO was associated with worse outcomes at 3 months., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus direct MT in different age groups of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation., Methods: Consecutive patients from the prospective endovascular stroke registry of the Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy, between January 2015 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into age groups (≤ 80 years old and > 80 years old); for each age group, they were further divided in the bridging therapy group and the direct MT group. We performed a propensity score analysis according to baseline characteristics. Safety outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 3-month mortality. Efficacy outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI, score ≥ 2b) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, ≤ 2)., Results: We included 761 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO (mean age 73.5 ± 12.8 years; 44.8% males; mean baseline NIHSS 16 ± 5). After propensity score, there were 365 patients ≤ 80 years old (52% bridging therapy) and 187 patients > 80 years old (57% bridging therapy). In both age groups of patients, we found no statistically significant differences in the rates of any ICH, sICH, successful recanalization and 3-month mortality and functional independence between bridging therapy and direct MT groups., Conclusion: In our population, safety and efficacy outcomes of bridging therapy versus direct MT did not differ in both AIS patients ≤ 80 and > 80 years old., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Belgian Neurological Society.)

Background: The predictors of intracranial haemorrhagic transformation (HT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are not well known., Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the possible clinical and radiological predictors of HT in patients, irrespective of clinical indication for this treatment., Design: This study is a monocentric cohort retrospective study., Methods: We enrolled consecutive AIS patients, from our prospective register, admitted to Stroke Unit between June 2021 and June 2023 undergoing DAPT with Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel within 72 h from symptoms onset. According to current guidelines, DAPT indication was for patients with a minor stroke, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and carotid angioplasty stenting. We collected clinical, demographical and radiological data. We used ABC/2 method to measure stroke volume in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences performed within 48 h. The primary outcome was the presence of HT at non-contrast brain computed tomography, performed 7 days after commencing DAPT., Results: One hundred ninety-four patients were included. Twenty-eight (14.4%) presented HT. Higher NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and MRI/DWI lesion volume related to increased risk of HT ( p  < 0.001). Reperfusion therapy and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), stent placement and a loading dose (LD) of dual antiplatelet or Clopidogrel were associated with a higher occurrence of HT ( p  < 0.05). Furthermore, we individuated an NIHSS cut-off value >4 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.65) and a volume cut-off value >8.2 ml (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.80) associated with an increased risk of HT (respectively, adjusted odds ratio (adj. OR) 6.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.3-32.7, p  = 0.024 and adj. OR 11.0, CI 3.1-39.2, p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: In clinical practice, MT treatment, antiplatelet LD administration, stent placement and clinical severity may relate to a higher risk of HT in patients with AIS and DAPT in the acute phase. In particular, we found that lesion volume cut-off could help to identify patients at greater risk of HT, regardless of the indication for DAPT., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Background: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS., Methods and Results: This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P <0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes., Conclusions: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Background: Although a benefit from mechanical thrombectomy has been proven, the best treatment strategy for tandem occlusions (TOs) remains unclear. We conducted a survey that aimed to investigate the trends of pharmacological strategy in the setting of emergent carotid stenting for TOs in the Italian neuro-endovascular community., Methods: We administered a 13-multiple choice-questions survey to the Chiefs of the centers participating to the Italian Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke (IRETAS), focused on the technical aspects and on the management of the antiplatelet therapy for emergent carotid tenting in TOs. An internal coherence control was performed by the coordinating investigator., Results: We obtained responses from 56/66 centers (84.8%). The main results of the survey showed that most of the center treat TOs using a retrograde approach, deploying a closed-cell stent. A single antiplatelet therapy is preferred at the moment of the deployment of the stent., Conclusions: This survey showed that the current practice regarding the acute management of TOs, in particular the antiplatelet therapy, remains heterogeneous in the Italian neurovascular community. Specific evidences are urgently needed in order to achieve a consensus on the acute management of TOs., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Objectives: Few experiences on vertebrobasilar occlusion over underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease have been reported in literature and the optimal strategy on how to perform a mechanical thrombectomy is unclear. The aim of this paper is to bring our experience based on patients admitted with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion with underlying atheromatous lesions., Materials and Methods: Several data were collected from August 2009 to October 2022 including clinical history, pre- and post-treatment neurological objectivity, diagnostic images and angiographic procedural images, and clinical outcome at 6 months. We selected 13 patients from August 2009 to October 2022, 12 men and 1 woman, aged 40 to 82 years (mean age, 62.6 years)., Results: Mechanical thrombectomy with a thromboaspiration was performed in all patients as beginning of the procedure. In three patients, the procedures resulted in excellent angiographic result and clinical outcome, while in three patients, we observed a failure of the procedural and clinical outcome. For residual intracranial stenosis in three patients, an angioplasty was performed obtaining an ischemic area related to the posterior circulation. In four patients, a stent was placed, in three patients, we obtained a good clinical outcome with a mRS between 0 and 2, while one treatment resulted in death, probably due to a late endovascular treatment., Conclusions: Endovascular treatment with stent deployment appears to result in an excellent outcome in patients with occlusion of the vertebrobasilar circulation in cases of occlusion on atheromatic plaque. The degree of residual stenosis after thrombospiration can significantly affect subsequent type of treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: We aim to assess the association between procedural time and outcomes in patients in unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation acute stroke., Methods: We conducted a cohort study on prospectively collected data from patients with M1 and/or M2 segment of middle cerebral artery occlusion with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 0-1 at the end of procedure. Primary outcome was 90-day poor outcome. Secondary outcomes were early neurological deterioration (END), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to ECASS II and sICH according to SITS-MOST., Results: Among 852 patients, after comparing characteristics of favourable and poor outcome groups, logistic regression analysis showed age (OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001), previous TIA/stroke (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.12-0.74; p = 0.009), M1 occlusion (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.13-2.50; p = 0.01), baseline NIHSS (OR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.06-1.13; p < 0.001) and procedural time (OR:1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.003) as independent predictors poor outcome at 90 days. Concerning secondary outcomes, logistic regression analysis showed NIHSS (OR:0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.008), general anaesthesia (OR:2.59; 95%CI: 1.52-4.40; p < 0.001), procedural time (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; p = 0.002) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 1.89; 95%CI: 1.02-3.52; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of END. Bridging therapy (OR:2.93; 95%CI: 1.21-7.09; p = 0.017) was associated with sICH per SITS-MOST criteria whereas M1 occlusion (OR: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.18-0.69; p = 0.002), bridging therapy (OR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.07-3.82; p = 0.03) and intraprocedural complications (OR: 5.55; 95%CI: 2.72-11.31; p < 0.001) were independently associated with sICH per ECASS II criteria. No significant association was found between the number of MT attempts and analyzed outcomes., Conclusions: Regardless of the number of MT attempts and intraprocedural complications, procedural time was associated with poor outcome and END. We suggest a deeper consideration of procedural time when treating anterior circulation occlusions refractory to MT., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Approximately 30% of patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion have pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≥2. We aimed to investigate the safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with AIS with moderate pre-stroke disability (mRS score 3) in an extended time frame (ie, 6-24 hours from the last time known well)., Methods: Data were collected from five centers in Europe and the USA from January 2018 to January 2023 and included 180 patients who underwent EVT in an extended time frame. Patients were divided into two groups of 90 each (Group 1: pre-mRS 0-2; Group 2: pre-mRS 3; 71% women, mean age 80.3±11.9 years). Primary outcomes were: (1) 3-month good clinical outcome (Group 1: mRS 0-2, Group 2: mRS 0-3) and ΔmRS; (2) any hemorrhagic transformation (HT); and (3) symptomatic HT. Secondary outcomes were successful and complete recanalization after EVT and 3-month mortality., Results: No between-group differences were found in the 3-month good clinical outcome (26.6% vs 25.5%, P=0.974), any HT (26.6% vs 22%, P=0.733), and symptomatic HT (8.9 vs 4.4%, P=0.232). Unexpectedly, ΔmRS was significantly smaller in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (1.64±1.61 vs 2.97±1.69, P<0.001). No between-group differences were found in secondary outcomes., Conclusion: Patients with pre-stroke mRS 3 are likely to have similar outcomes after EVT in the extended time frame to those with pre-stroke mRS 0-2, with no difference in safety., Competing Interests: Competing interests: T.N. Nguyen discloses advisory board for Brainomix, Aruna Bio; Associate Editor of Stroke. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a treatable X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA gene variants leading to alpha-galactosidase A deficiency. FD is a rare cause of stroke, and it is still controversial whether in stroke patients FD should be searched from the beginning or at the end of the diagnostic workup (in cryptogenic strokes)., Methods: Fabry-Stroke Italian Registry is a prospective, multicentric screening involving 33 stroke units. FD was sought by measuring α-galactosidase A activity (males) and by genetic tests (males with reduced enzyme activity and females) in patients aged 18-60 years hospitalized for TIA, ischemic stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage. We diagnosed FD in patients with 1) already known pathogenic GLA variants; 2) novel GLA variants if additional clinical, laboratory, or family-derived criteria were present., Results: Out of 1906 patients, we found a GLA variant in 15 (0.79%; 95%CI 0.44-1.29) with a certain FD diagnosis in 3 (0.16%; 95%CI 0.03-0.46) patients, none of whom had hemorrhage. We identified 1 novel pathogenic GLA variant. Ischemic stroke etiologies in carriers of GLA variants were: cardioaortic embolism (33%), small artery occlusion (27%), other causes (20%), and undetermined (20%). Mild severity, recurrence, previous TIA, acroparesthesias, hearing loss, and small artery occlusion were predictors of GLA variant., Conclusion: In this large multicenter cohort the frequency of FD and GLA variants was consistent with previous reports. Limiting the screening for GLA variants to patients with cryptogenic stroke may miss up to 80% of diagnoses. Some easily recognizable clinical features could help select patients for FD screening., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest IR received travel grants and speaker's honoraria from Takeda, Sanofi, and Amicus; PN received speaker's honoraria from Takeda, Sanofi, and Amicus; MZ received fees as consultant and advisory board member from Takeda, Sanofi, and Amicus; SS received personal fees as speaker or advisor (Abbott, Allergan-Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Teva), research grants (Allergan, Novartis, Uriach), and fees for CME/education (Medscape, Neurodiem Ology Medical Education); UA received speaker's fees and honoraria from EISAI; AM received speaker's honoraria and travel grants from Takeda, Sanofi, and Amicus; DI received speaker's honoraria from Takeda. Other authors declared that they have no competing interests for FSIR study., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of M2 segment treated with thromboaspiration., Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with ischemic stroke of M2 segment undergoing endovascular thromboaspiration. The time period analyzed was from October 2015 until February 2021. Thromboaspiration was performed with AXS Catalyst 5 (Stryker) or AXS Catalyst 6 (Stryker) catheters. The following parameters were assessed: risk factors for ischemic stroke, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (entry and discharge), pre-procedural fibrinolysis, pre-procedural and 24-h Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, recanalization time, number of passages for recanalization, Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale score, periprocedural complications, Modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days from procedure and mortality., Results: 90 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 75 ± 11.1 with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at entry 13 ± 5 and 8 ± 4 at discharge. Pre-procedural fibrinolysis were performed in 40 patients. Pre-procedural Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were 8.8 ± 1.3 and 6.9 ± 2.4 after 24 h from the procedure. Time of recanalization from onset of symptoms was 300 ± 82 min. Number of passages for recanalization were 1.8 ± 1.1. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale score ≥ 2b were obtained in 90 % of procedures. After 90 days 33 % of patient obtained an Modified Rankin Scale between 0 and 1 (between 0 and 2 was 40 %). We didn't detect any complication in 64 % of cases (subarachnoid haemorrhage in 2 %, HI1 and HI 2 in 15 %, PH1 in 9 % of patients, PH2 in 6 % of patients)., Conclusions: This paper confirms the usefulness and safety of thrombospiration in patients with ischemic stroke in the M2 segment with low intra-operative risks, high technical success and positive impact on the outcome of the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)