Search

Objectives: Whether pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg (T/C) in individuals with hematologic disease (HD) may lead to a reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection (BTI)/hospitalization, or death in the Omicron era remains to be established. Methods: An observational study included participants with HD who received PrEP. BTIs were defined as SARS-CoV-2 positivity by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The incidence of BTIs (95% CI) and of BTIs/hospitalization/death was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and as the number of BTIs per 100 person-years of follow-up according to the circulating variant of concern (VoC). A Poisson regression model was used to evaluate the association between the rate of incidence and circulating VoCs after controlling for demographics and clinical factors. Results: We included 550 HD patients: 71% initiated T/C PrEP when BA.5 was the most prevalent, followed by XBB/EG, BA.2, and BA.1 (19%, 7%, and 3%, respectively). Overall, the 1-year incidence estimate of BTIs/hospitalization/death was 24% (18.7-29.4%). A greater risk of incident infections was observed when BA.5 and XBB/EG sub-lineages circulated (aRR 5.05 [2.17, 11.77]; P < .001 and 3.82 [1.50, 9.7]; P = 0.005, compared to BA.1, respectively). Conclusions: The 1-year incidence of SARS-CoV-2 BTIs/hospitalization/death was 24% which is in line with what was observed in other similar studies. The risk appeared to be higher when more recent Omicron sub-lineages were circulating suggesting a reduction of in vitro neutralization.

Objective. We aimed to report the real-world use and outcomes over time in immunocompromised individuals receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods. This observational study included participants who received T/C PrEP, categorized into three groups: (i) No COVID-19 (NoC), i.e., participants who never had COVID-19; (ii) Hybrids (H), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 before PrEP; and (iii) Break-through Infections (BTIs), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 after PrEP. The study measured several immune markers at the administration of T/C (T0) at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 9 (T3) months afterward. These markers included: anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies; BA.5-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs); mucosal IgG; and T cell immunity. The incidence rate ratios for BTIs were analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Results. A total of 231 participants with a median age of 63 years (IQR 54.0–73.0). were included. Among these, 84% had hematological diseases and received a median of three vaccine doses. N = 72 participants belonged to the NoC group, N = 103 to the H group, and n = 56 to the BTI group (24%), with most BTIs being mild/moderate. The incidence rate (IR) of BTIs was 4.2 per 100 patient-months (95% CI 3.2–5.4), with no associated risk factors identified. There was a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels 3 months after the T/C administration in all groups, followed by a decline at 6 months, whereas at the same time points, geometric mean titers (GMTs) of anti-BA.5 nAbs were low for all groups and were around or below the detection threshold. No significant changes were observed in IFN-γ levels. The mucosal immune response was observed only 3 months after the PrEP administration. Conclusion. We provided a real-world experience model on the clinical efficacy of T/C PrEP in preventing severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave through a comprehensive virological and immunological study. While waiting for the arrival of new monoclonal antibodies that can effectively neutralize the most recent variants, T/C PrEP remains the only viable strategy in the available armamentarium today to prevent COVID-19 complications in an extremely fragile population with suboptimal immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines.

Ponatinib may be effective in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients after failure of first/second line therapies. Although its efficacy for minimum plasma concentrations (Cmin) is >21.3 ng/mL (equal to 40 nM), ponatinib may cause adverse events (AE) that require dose optimization. The present study was aimed at investigating any possible correlations among ponatinib dose, plasma concentration, molecular response (MR), and tolerability in a real-world setting. Clinical and laboratory records (including MR and drug plasma concentrations) of 32 CML patients treated with ponatinib were harvested and analyzed. Twenty-seven patients (71%) had ponatinib Cmin values > 21.3 ng/mL, but Cmin values > 10.7 ng/mL (considered efficacious in BCR-Abl unmutated patients) were achieved by 80% of the patients receiving ≥30 mg/day and 45% of the subjects treated with 15 mg/day. No significant correlations were identified among clinical efficacy, tolerability, daily dose, and plasma concentration. Notably, patients who underwent dose tapering for tolerability or safety reasons did not experience treatment failure. In a real-world setting, adjustment of ponatinib daily doses lower than those registered may maintain therapeutic efficacy while reducing the risk of vascular events and improving tolerability. Further studies are warranted to confirm the present results in a larger cohort of patients.

Background: While the outcomes of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients aged over 65 years have been extensively evaluated in real-life experiences, limited data exist for the very elderly population (i.e., aged ≥ 75 years), especially for next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TKIs in this particular setting of patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort of 123 newly diagnosed CP-CML very elderly patients. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 80 years (range: 75–96). In the first line, 86.1% of patients received imatinib, 7.1% dasatinib, 5.6% nilotinib, and 0.81% received bosutinib. A total of 31 patients (25.2%) switched to second-line therapy, nine patients to a third line, and one patient to a fourth line of therapy. Resistance to treatment was the primary reason for switching therapy in both the first (64.5%) and second lines (77.7%). At diagnosis, reduced doses were administered in 36.5% of patients, in 61.2% in the second line, and in all patients in subsequent lines of therapy. In the first-line setting, 71.9% of patients achieved an early molecular response (EMR, i.e., 3-month BCR::ABL1IS < 10%); at 6, 12, and 24 months, MR3 was reached by 35.7%, 55.7%, and 75.0% of patients, respectively, with 16.6%, 35.7%, and 51.7% achieving a deep molecular response (DMR) at the same time points. Treatment-free remission (TFR) was successfully attempted in 11 patients. During the follow-up period, adverse events (AEs) were observed in 78.8% of patients, including 22 cases of cardiovascular AEs. Toxicity grade ≥ 3 was more commonly observed in patients treated with standard doses of TKIs compared to reduced doses (p = 0.033). Overall, the median follow-up was 46.62 months (range: 1.8–206.2), and 43 patients died due to non-CML-related causes. Three patients died due to disease progression to advanced (n = 1) and blastic (n = 2) phases. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 71.9% (95% CI: 0.63–0.81), with no significant difference between the patients treated with standard doses of TKIs compared to those treated with reduced doses (p = 0.35). Conclusions: TKIs appear to be safe and effective even in very elderly CML patients, and dose optimization strategies yield satisfactory molecular responses for adequate disease control with an improved safety profile.