1. Collaboration and engagement with decision-makers are needed to reduce evidence complacency in wildlife management.
- Author
-
Kadykalo, Andrew N., Findlay, C. Scott, Spencer, Matthew, Callaghan, Chris L., Cooke, Steven J., and Young, Nathan
- Subjects
- *
WILDLIFE management , *FISHERY management , *NATURAL resources management , *NETWORK governance , *COGNITIVE maps (Psychology) , *ENVIRONMENTAL management - Abstract
There exists an extensive, diverse, and robust evidence base to support complex decisions that address the planetary biodiversity crisis. However, it is generally not sought or used by environmental decision-makers, who instead draw on intuition, experience, or opinion to inform important decisions. Thus, there is a need to examine evidence exchange processes in wildlife management to understand the multiple inputs to decisions. Here, we adopt a novel approach, fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM), to examine perceptions of individuals from Indigenous and Western governments on the reliability of evidence which may influence freshwater fisheries management decisions in British Columbia, Canada. We facilitated four FCM workshops participants representing Indigenous or Western regulatory/governance groups of fisheries managers. Our results show that flows of evidence to decision-makers occur within a relatively closed governance network, constrained to the few well-connected decision-making organizations (i.e., wildlife management agencies) and their close partners. This implies that increased collaboration (i.e., knowledge co-production) and engagement (i.e., knowledge brokerage) with wildlife managers and decision-makers are needed to produce actionable evidence and increase evidence exchange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF