7 results on '"Forster, Piers"'
Search Results
2. Efficacy of climate forcings in transient CMIP6 simulations
- Author
-
Myhre, Gunnar, primary, Byrom, Rachael E., additional, Andrews, Timothy, additional, Forster, Piers M., additional, and Smith, Christopher J., additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence
- Author
-
Forster, Piers M., primary, Smith, Chris, additional, Walsh, Tristram, additional, Lamb, William F., additional, Lamboll, Robin, additional, Hall, Bradley, additional, Hauser, Mathias, additional, Ribes, Aurélien, additional, Rosen, Debbie, additional, Gillett, Nathan P., additional, Palmer, Matthew D., additional, Rogelj, Joeri, additional, von Schuckmann, Karina, additional, Trewin, Blair, additional, Allen, Myles, additional, Andrew, Robbie, additional, Betts, Richard A., additional, Borger, Alex, additional, Boyer, Tim, additional, Broersma, Jiddu A., additional, Buontempo, Carlo, additional, Burgess, Samantha, additional, Cagnazzo, Chiara, additional, Cheng, Lijing, additional, Friedlingstein, Pierre, additional, Gettelman, Andrew, additional, Gütschow, Johannes, additional, Ishii, Masayoshi, additional, Jenkins, Stuart, additional, Lan, Xin, additional, Morice, Colin, additional, Mühle, Jens, additional, Kadow, Christopher, additional, Kennedy, John, additional, Killick, Rachel E., additional, Krummel, Paul B., additional, Minx, Jan C., additional, Myhre, Gunnar, additional, Naik, Vaishali, additional, Peters, Glen P., additional, Pirani, Anna, additional, Pongratz, Julia, additional, Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, additional, Seneviratne, Sonia I., additional, Szopa, Sophie, additional, Thorne, Peter, additional, Kovilakam, Mahesh V. M., additional, Majamäki, Elisa, additional, Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka, additional, van Marle, Margreet, additional, Hoesly, Rachel M., additional, Rohde, Robert, additional, Schumacher, Dominik, additional, van der Werf, Guido, additional, Vose, Russell, additional, Zickfeld, Kirsten, additional, Zhang, Xuebin, additional, Masson-Delmotte, Valérie, additional, and Zhai, Panmao, additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Recent reductions in aerosol emissions have increased Earth’s energy imbalance
- Author
-
Hodnebrog, Øivind, primary, Myhre, Gunnar, additional, Jouan, Caroline, additional, Andrews, Timothy, additional, Forster, Piers M., additional, Jia, Hailing, additional, Loeb, Norman G., additional, Olivié, Dirk J. L., additional, Paynter, David, additional, Quaas, Johannes, additional, Raghuraman, Shiv Priyam, additional, and Schulz, Michael, additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A perspective on the next generation of Earth system model scenarios: towards representative emission pathways (REPs).
- Author
-
Meinshausen, Malte, Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, Beyer, Kathleen, Bodeker, Greg, Boucher, Olivier, Canadell, Josep G., Daniel, John S., Diongue-Niang, Aïda, Driouech, Fatima, Fischer, Erich, Forster, Piers, Grose, Michael, Hansen, Gerrit, Hausfather, Zeke, Ilyina, Tatiana, Kikstra, Jarmo S., Kimutai, Joyce, King, Andrew D., Lee, June-Yi, and Lennard, Chris
- Subjects
PARIS Agreement (2016) ,CONTRACTS ,GOVERNMENT policy on climate change ,PHYSIOLOGICAL adaptation ,EARTH (Planet) ,GROUP work in research - Abstract
In every Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment cycle, a multitude of scenarios are assessed, with different scope and emphasis throughout the various Working Group reports and special reports, as well as their respective chapters. Within the reports, the ambition is to integrate knowledge on possible climate futures across the Working Groups and scientific research domains based on a small set of "framing pathways" such as the so-called representative concentration pathways (RCPs) in the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5) and the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios in the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). This perspective, initiated by discussions at the IPCC Bangkok workshop in April 2023 on the "Use of Scenarios in AR6 and Subsequent Assessments", is intended to serve as one of the community contributions to highlight the needs for the next generation of framing pathways that is being advanced under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) umbrella, which will influence or even predicate the IPCC AR7 consideration of framing pathways. Here we suggest several policy research objectives that such a set of framing pathways should ideally fulfil, including mitigation needs for meeting the Paris Agreement objectives, the risks associated with carbon removal strategies, the consequences of delay in enacting that mitigation, guidance for adaptation needs, loss and damage, and for achieving mitigation in the wider context of societal development goals. Based on this context, we suggest that the next generation of climate scenarios for Earth system models should evolve towards representative emission pathways (REPs) and suggest key categories for such pathways. These framing pathways should address the most critical mitigation policy and adaptation plans that need to be implemented over the next 10 years. In our view, the most important categories are those relevant in the context of the Paris Agreement long-term goal, specifically an immediate action (low overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway and a delayed action (high overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway. Two other key categories are a pathway category approximately in line with current (as expressed by 2023) near- and long-term policy objectives, as well as a higher-emission category that is approximately in line with "current policies" (as expressed by 2023). We also argue for the scientific and policy relevance in exploring two "worlds that could have been". One of these categories has high-emission trajectories well above what is implied by current policies and the other has very-low-emission trajectories which assume that global mitigation action in line with limiting warming to 1.5 °C without overshoot had begun in 2015. Finally, we note that the timely provision of new scientific information on pathways is critical to inform the development and implementation of climate policy. Under the Paris Agreement, for the second global stocktake, which will occur in 2028, and to inform subsequent development of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) up to 2040, scientific inputs are required by 2027. These needs should be carefully considered in the development timeline of community modelling activities, including those under CMIP7. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing.
- Author
-
Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, Niklas, Miersch, Klaas, Khanna, Tarun M., Bachelet, Marion, Bruns, Stephan B., Callaghan, Max, Edenhofer, Ottmar, Flachsland, Christian, Forster, Piers M., Kalkuhl, Matthias, Koch, Nicolas, Lamb, William F., Ohlendorf, Nils, Steckel, Jan Christoph, and Minx, Jan C.
- Subjects
CARBON pricing ,CLIMATE change ,ELASTICITY (Economics) ,GREENHOUSE gas mitigation ,EVIDENCE gaps ,CLIMATOLOGY ,CLIMATE change denial - Abstract
Today, more than 70 carbon pricing schemes have been implemented around the globe, but their contributions to emissions reductions remains a subject of heated debate in science and policy. Here we assess the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing emissions using a rigorous, machine-learning assisted systematic review and meta-analysis. Based on 483 effect sizes extracted from 80 causal ex-post evaluations across 21 carbon pricing schemes, we find that introducing a carbon price has yielded immediate and substantial emission reductions for at least 17 of these policies, despite the low level of prices in most instances. Statistically significant emissions reductions range between –5% to –21% across the schemes (–4% to –15% after correcting for publication bias). Our study highlights critical evidence gaps with regard to dozens of unevaluated carbon pricing schemes and the price elasticity of emissions reductions. More rigorous synthesis of carbon pricing and other climate policies is required across a range of outcomes to advance our understanding of "what works" and accelerate learning on climate solutions in science and policy. Carbon pricing policies are adopted in many countries around the world to mitigate climate change. This systematic review shows that significant emission reductions of between 5 and 21% are achieved by at least 17 out of 21 reviewed policy schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Sea-surface temperature pattern effects have slowed global warming and biased warming-based constraints on climate sensitivity.
- Author
-
Armour, Kyle C., Proistosescu, Cristian, Yue Dong, Hahn, Lily C., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Edward, Pauling, Andrew G., Wills, Robert C. Jnglin, Andrews, Timothy, Stuecker, Malte F., Po-Chedley, Stephen, Mitevski, Ivan, Forster, Piers M., and Gregory, Jonathan M.
- Subjects
CLIMATE sensitivity ,GLOBAL warming ,TEMPERATURE effect ,WIND power industry - Abstract
The observed rate of global warming since the 1970s has been proposed as a strong constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR)--key metrics of the global climate response to greenhouse-gas forcing. Using CMIP5/6 models, we show that the inter-model relationship between warming and these climate sensitivity metrics (the basis for the constraint) arises from a similarity in transient and equilibrium warming patterns within the models, producing an effective climate sensitivity (EffCS) governing recent warming that is comparable to the value of ECS governing long-term warming under CO
2 forcing. However, CMIP5/6 historical simulations do not reproduce observed warming patterns. When driven by observed patterns, even high ECS models produce low EffCS values consistent with the observed global warming rate. The inability of CMIP5/6 models to reproduce observed warming patterns thus results in a bias in the modeled relationship between recent global warming and climate sensitivity. Correcting for this bias means that observed warming is consistent with wide ranges of ECS and TCR extending to higher values than previously recognized. These findings are corroborated by energy balance model simulations and coupled model (CESM1-CAM5) simulations that better replicate observed patterns via tropospheric wind nudging or Antarctic meltwater fluxes. Because CMIP5/6 models fail to simulate observed warming patterns, proposed warming-based constraints on ECS, TCR, and projected global warming are biased low. The results reinforce recent findings that the unique pattern of observed warming has slowed global-mean warming over recent decades and that how the pattern will evolve in the future represents a major source of uncertainty in climate projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.