Search

Early survival prediction is vital for the clinical management of cancer patients, as tumors can be better controlled with personalized treatment planning. Traditional survival prediction methods are based on radiomics feature engineering and/or clinical indicators (e.g., cancer staging). Recently, survival prediction models with advances in deep learning techniques have achieved state-of-the-art performance in end-to-end survival prediction by exploiting deep features derived from medical images. However, existing models are heavily reliant on the prognostic information within primary tumors and cannot effectively leverage out-of-tumor prognostic information characterizing local tumor metastasis and adjacent tissue invasion. Also, existing models are sub-optimal in leveraging multi-modality medical images as they rely on empirically designed fusion strategies to integrate multi-modality information, where the fusion strategies are pre-defined based on domain-specific human prior knowledge and inherently limited in adaptability. Here, we present an Adaptive Multi-modality Segmentation-to-Survival model (AdaMSS) for survival prediction from multi-modality medical images. The AdaMSS can self-adapt its fusion strategy based on training data and also can adapt its focus regions to capture the prognostic information outside the primary tumors. Extensive experiments with two large cancer datasets (1380 patients from nine medical centers) show that our AdaMSS surmounts the state-of-the-art survival prediction performance (C-index: 0.804 and 0.757), demonstrating the potential to facilitate personalized treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Direct volume rendering (DVR) is an important tool for scientific and medical imaging visualization. Modern GPU acceleration has made DVR more accessible; however, the production of high‐quality rendered images with high frame rates is computationally expensive. We propose a deep learning method with a reduced computational demand. We leveraged a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) to upsample DVR images (a rendered scene), with a reduced sampling rate to obtain similar visual quality to that of a fully sampled method. Our dvrGAN is combined with a colour‐based loss function that is optimized for DVR images where different structures such as skin, bone, etc. are distinguished by assigning them distinct colours. The loss function highlights the structural differences between images, by examining pixel‐level colour, and thus helps identify, for instance, small bones in the limbs that may not be evident with reduced sampling rates. We evaluated our method in DVR of human computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) volumes. Our method retained image quality and reduced computation time when compared to fully sampled methods and outperformed existing state‐of‐the‐art upsampling methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Amyloidosis, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and markers of small vessel disease (SVD) vary across dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) presenilin-1 (PSEN1) mutation carriers. We investigated how mutation position relative to codon 200 (pre-/postcodon 200) influences these pathologic features and dementia at different stages., Methods: Individuals from families with known PSEN1 mutations (n = 393) underwent neuroimaging and clinical assessments. We cross-sectionally evaluated regional Pittsburgh compound B-positron emission tomography uptake, magnetic resonance imaging markers of SVD (diffusion tensor imaging-based white matter injury, white matter hyperintensity volumes, and microhemorrhages), and cognition., Results: Postcodon 200 carriers had lower amyloid burden in all regions but worse markers of SVD and worse Clinical Dementia Rating ® scores compared to precodon 200 carriers as a function of estimated years to symptom onset. Markers of SVD partially mediated the mutation position effects on clinical measures., Discussion: We demonstrated the genotypic variability behind spatiotemporal amyloidosis, SVD, and clinical presentation in DIAD, which may inform patient prognosis and clinical trials., Highlights: Mutation position influences Aβ burden, SVD, and dementia. PSEN1 pre-200 group had stronger associations between Aβ burden and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had stronger associations between SVD markers and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had worse dementia score than pre-200 in late disease stage. Diffusion tensor imaging-based SVD markers mediated mutation position effects on dementia in the late stage., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)