Search

Background: Despite the widespread implementation of telemedicine, there are limited data regarding its impact on key components of care for patients with incurable or high‐risk cancer. For these patients, high‐quality care requires detailed conversations regarding treatment priorities (advance care planning) and clinical care to minimize unnecessary acute care (unplanned hospitalizations). Whether telemedicine affects these outcomes relative to in‐person clinic visits was examined among patients with cancer at high risk for 6‐month mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with cancer with any tumor type treated at the University of Pennsylvania who were newly identified between April 1 and December 31, 2020, to be at high risk for 6‐month mortality via a validated machine learning algorithm. Separate modified Poisson regressions were used to assess the occurrence of advance care planning and unplanned hospitalizations for telemedicine as compared to in‐person visits. Additional analyses were done comparing telemedicine type (video or phone) as compared to in‐person clinic visits. Results: The occurrence of advance care planning was similar between telemedicine and in‐person visits (6.8% vs. 6.0%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.92–1.69). In regard to telemedicine subtype, patients exposed to video encounters were modestly more likely to have documented advance care planning in comparison to those seen in person (7.5% vs. 6.0%; aRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03–2.11). The 3‐month risk for unplanned hospitalization was comparable for telemedicine compared to in‐person clinic encounters (21% vs. 18%; aRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.81–1.38). Conclusions: In this study, care delivered by telemedicine, compared to in‐person clinic visits, produced comparable rates of advance care planning conversations without increasing hospitalizations, which suggests that vulnerable patients can be managed safely by telemedicine. In this study, care delivered by telemedicine, compared to in‐person clinic visits, produced comparable rates of advance care planning conversations without increasing hospitalizations, which suggests that vulnerable patients can be managed safely by telemedicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Less than half of the patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo comprehensive molecular testing. We designed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based "nudge intervention" to prompt plasma-based molecular testing at the time of initial medical oncology consultation., Methods: A nonrandomized prospective trial was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania's academic practice and two affiliated community practices. Molecular genotyping was performed by tissue- and/or plasma-based next generation sequencing methods. Comprehensive testing was defined as testing for EGFR , ALK , BRAF , ROS1 , MET , RET , KRAS , and NTRK . Guideline-concordant treatment was defined as the use of the appropriate first-line (1L) therapy as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Proportion of patients with comprehensive molecular genotyping results available at any time, molecular results available before 1L therapy, and guideline-concordant 1L treatment were compared between the preintervention and postintervention cohorts using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test., Results: Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, 376 in the preintervention cohort and 157 in the postintervention cohort. After implementation of the EMR-based nudge, a higher proportion of patients underwent comprehensive molecular testing in the postintervention versus the preintervention cohort (100% v 88%, P = <.001), had results of comprehensive molecular testing available before initiating 1L treatment (97.3% v 91.6%, P = .026), and received NCCN guideline-concordant care (89.8% v 78.2%, P = .035)., Conclusion: Across three practice sites in a large health system, implementation of a provider team-focused EMR-based nudge intervention was feasible, and led to a higher number of patients with NSCLC undergoing comprehensive molecular genotyping. These findings demonstrate that behavioral nudges can promote molecular testing and should be studied further as a tool to improve guideline-concordant care in both community and academic sites.

Drawing from insights from communication science and behavioral economics, the University of Pennsylvania Telehealth Research Center of Excellence (Penn TRACE) is designing and testing telehealth strategies with the potential to transform access to care, care quality, outcomes, health equity, and health-care efficiency across the cancer care continuum, with an emphasis on understanding mechanisms of action. Penn TRACE uses lung cancer care as an exemplar model for telehealth across the care continuum, from screening to treatment to survivorship. We bring together a diverse and interdisciplinary team of international experts and incorporate rapid-cycle approaches and mixed methods evaluation in all center projects. Our initiatives include a pragmatic sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of telehealth strategies to increase shared decision-making for lung cancer screening and 2 pilot projects to test the effectiveness of telehealth to improve cancer care, identify multilevel mechanisms of action, and lay the foundation for future pragmatic trials. Penn TRACE aims to produce new fundamental knowledge and advance telehealth science in cancer care at Penn and nationally., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)