1. Elective outpatient middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma is safe.
- Author
-
McGrath M, Gallagher A, Raub S, Carroll KT, Abecassis ZA, Ruiz Rodriguez JF, Philbrick BD, Kellner CP, Sioutas GS, Scott K, Srinivasan VM, Burkhardt JK, Shaikh HA, Khalife J, Tonetti DA, Lam N, Ares WJ, Gomez-Paz S, Budohoski K, Grandhi R, and Levitt MR
- Abstract
Background: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a safe and effective treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH); however, the appropriate level of postoperative care is unknown., Objective: To evaluate whether elective MMAE for cSDH could be safely performed in an outpatient setting., Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with cSDH who underwent elective MMAE. Patients were categorized as either inpatient (admitted for ≥1 night of hospitalization after MMAE) or outpatient (discharged on the same day of MMAE). Patient demographics, radiological data, procedural details, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was periprocedural complications, and secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits or unplanned readmission within 24 hours, 1-7 days, and 8-30 days after MMAE., Results: Elective MMAE procedures were carried out in 190 patients, of which 45.3% (n=86) were outpatient procedures and 54.7% (n=104) inpatient. There were 7 (3.7%) periprocedural complications (one outpatient, six inpatient; P=0.12). Five patients presented to the ED and were readmitted within 24 hours of MMAE (three outpatient, two inpatient). Six patients presented to the ED 1-7 days after MMAE (three outpatient, three inpatient); three were subsequently admitted (one outpatient and two inpatient). Nine patients presented to the ED 8-30 days after MMAE (two outpatient and seven inpatient); three were subsequently readmitted (all inpatient). No elective outpatient MMAE resulted in a readmission attributable to the procedure within the examined time frame., Conclusion: Elective MMAE can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure without increased risk of postprocedural adverse events in most eligible patients with cSDH., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CPK: Research grant support from Integra, Penumbra, Viz.AI, Siemens, Medtronic, Minnetronix, Longeviti, Irras, ICE Neurosystems, CVAID, Endostream, and Microtransponder; equity interest in Precision Recovery, Borealis, E8, Borvo, and Metis Innovative. Metis Innovative is an investment group that has coordinated investments in Synchron, Proprio, Fluid Biomed, Von Vascular, and Precision Recovery. JKB: Consulting for Stryker, Microvention, Cerenovus, Q’Apel, Balt and Siemens. RG: Consulting for Cerenovus, Stryker, Balt, Rapid Medical and Medtronic. MRL: Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; equity interest in Proprio, Synchron, Hyperion Surgical, Stroke Diagnostics, Fluid Biomed, Apertur; consulting for Aeaean Advisers, Metis Innovative, Stereotaxis, Genomadix, AIDoc; data safety monitoring board of Arsenal Medical; editorial board of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF