Search

The eyelid margin is vital to ocular surface integrity. Much peerreviewed literature has been established in eyelid margin inflammation, better known as blepharitis. The purpose was to review and understand the impact of eyelid margin disease. Anterior blepharitis causes inflammation at the eyelash base, ciliary follicles, and the palpebral skin. Posterior blepharitis occurs when there is inflammation with the posterior eyelid margin disease. In common usage, the term "blepharitis" used alone almost always refers to anterior blepharitis. Classification of eyelid margin disease should be based on etiopathogenesis, location, primary vs secondary, and chronicity. Blepharitis has several etiopathologies (infectious, inflammatory, and squamous). Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) can refer to the functional and/or structural problems with the meibomian gland. Meibomitis (or meibomianitis) occurs when there is inflammation associated with the MGD. The presence of blepharitis and/orMGD(with or without inflammation) can affect the ocular surface and thereby affect anterior segment and cataract surgeries. This review article evaluates the differential diagnoses of eyelid margin disease, including various forms of blepharitis, MGD, and meibomitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "EEG patterns in long-term Brahmakumari meditators and their possible significance" discusses a study on the EEG patterns of long-term Brahmakumari meditators. The study found that during meditation, the meditators exhibited increased theta and alpha waves in specific areas of the brain, indicating a deep state of relaxation and calmness. The article acknowledges the limitations of the study, such as the small sample size, but overall, the findings support previous research on the effects of meditation on brain activity. [Extracted from the article]

Disability is a multifaceted and universal phenomenon that cuts across all cultures and religions. It poses unique challenges for individuals, families, and communities. It is shaped by a multitude of factors such as society, culture, economy, religion, etc. Sikhism, the fifth largest religion in the world, originated in the northern part of India in the 15th century with the first Sikh guru Nanak Dev (1469–1539). In the context of Sikhism, disability and religious teachings become important areas of exploration. This research paper attempts to understand how Sikhism addresses and engages with disability by highlighting both the theoretical foundations and practical manifestations. The theoretical foundations of Sikhism, i.e., equality, solidarity, and inclusiveness, are based on the supreme scripture Guru Granth Sahib, and the practical manifestations, i.e., rituals and norms, take their lead from Rehat Maryada, i.e., the Sikh code of conduct and conventions, which have been constructed by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC). The present paper examines the outlook of Sikhism towards disability in theory as per Guru Granth Sahib and in practice as per Sikh Rehat Maryada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 65-year-old man had uneventful cataract surgery in the right eye with a toric diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) placed fully within the capsule bag. On postoperative day 1 and week 1, the IOL was well positioned and his eye was healing normally. The plan was to proceed with cataract surgery in the left eye in the near future. One month postoperatively, he presented with blurred vision, glare, and halos and was noted to have iris prolapse out of the temporal clear corneal main incision. Of interest, the patient reported some itching and eye rubbing in the early postoperative period. He was taken back to surgery by the referring doctor, and despite 2 heroic attempts to reposit and save the iris tissue, there was significant iris loss causing transillumination defects and debilitating glare and halos. Ocular examination revealed an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 - 2 J3 and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) 20/30 J1 in the right eye and UDVA of 20/60 J3 and binocular CDVA of 20/25 J1 in the left eye. Manifest refraction was -0.25 -1.25 × 155 in the right eye and plano -2.25 × 090 in the left eye. Fortunately, there was no relative afferent pupillary defect, and intraocular pressures were normal off all drops. On slitlamp examination of the right eye, pertinent findings revealed a protective ptosis, trace conjunctival injection with 1 large subconjunctival polypropylene flange at 8:30 o'clock 1.5 mm from the limbus and 1 exposed irregular polypropylene flange eroded through the conjunctiva at 10 o'clock 0.5 mm from the limbus (Figures 1 and 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202408000-00019/figure1/v/2024-07-30T221851Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202408000-00019/figure2/v/2024-07-30T221851Z/r/image-tiff). There was a localized area of erythema and scleral thinning surrounding the exposed flange. The cornea was edematous over the main incision. The iris was disinserted with atrophic changes and a residual iridodialysis extending from 8:30 to 10 o'clock. The trifocal IOL was fully in the capsule bag with trace fibrosis of the capsule and rotated approximately 7 degrees off the capsulotomy tab, designating the intended axis of 1 degree. The anterior chamber was deep and quiet, and the posterior segment was unremarkable with a 0.45 cup-to-disc ratio. Pertinent examination findings in the left eye included a 2 + NS cataract and a 0.45 cup-to-disc ratio. The remainder of the examination was otherwise unremarkable. What testing and surgical plan would you offer this patient? How would you counsel regarding postoperative expectations?, (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)