Search

The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R-len) stands as an established treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). However, the reproducibility of clinical trial results in routine clinical practice is unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, we reviewed our experience with patients diagnosed with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) treated with this combination. Eighty-four patients underwent treatment with R-len, 69 (82%) affected by FL and 15 (18%) by MZL. The median age at the time of treatment initiation was 65 years (range, 39-94), 38 patients (45%) had a pre-treatment FLIPI score of 3-5, 19 (23%) had a bulky disease, 29 (37%) had a lymphoma refractory to the last treatment line, while in 20 (24%) cases the disease was refractory to rituximab. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 82%, and 52% achieved a complete response (CR). The best CR rates for FL and MZL patients were 55% and 40%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 22 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 22 months (95% CI 19-36) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 83% (95% CI 74-93). The median duration of CR (DoCR) was 46 months (95% CI 22-NR). Factors associated with shorter PFS in multivariate analysis were bulky disease and rituximab refractoriness. The most common adverse events (AE) included hematologic toxicity, fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea and constipation. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common severe toxicities (grade ≥3 in 25% and 4%, respectively). No new safety signals were reported. Real-life results of R-len in patients with R/R iNHL appear consistent with those reported in prospective studies, and further support its use as comparator arm in controlled clinical trials.

Despite continuous improvements in the management and treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), approximately 35% of the patients experience relapse or are refractory to frontline chemotherapy. For these patients, outcomes are far from satisfactory, and a real unmet need exists to both improve frontline treatment and create better options for relapsed/refractory disease. Polatuzumab vedotin is an anti-CD79b antibody conjugated to the monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) microtubule inhibitor. The molecule has recently been under the spotlights for the promising results of the frontline combination with rituximab cyclophosphamide doxorubicin and prednisone (R-CHP) in the phase III POLARIX study, demonstrating improved progression-free survival over standard R-CHOP. A remarkable improvement in terms of complete response rate and overall survival with polatuzumab vedotin has also been achieved by combining polatuzumab with rituximab and bendamustine (pola-BR) over the standard BR for relapsed/refractory patients. Based on the results of these studies, health authorities in several countries granted approval for polatuzumab vedotin both for patients with previously untreated and for relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this review, we summarize the data of major studies recently concluded with polatuzumab vedotin, and we provide an overview of the ongoing combination trials for frontline and relapsed/refractory DLBCL, outlining reported toxicities.

Not available.

The dark current is a fundamental figure of merit to characterize the performance of high-sensitivity, low-noise mid- and far-infrared barrier photodetectors. In the context of HgCdTe barrier photodetectors, the trend is to use very low doping concentrations, in an attempt to minimize recombination processes. In the present work, through TCAD simulations, we delve deeper into the design of low-dark-current $p{\mathrm{B}}n$ detectors, showing the possible existence of an optimum doping. This occurrence is investigated and interpreted also by means of closed-form expressions for the lifetimes, emphasizing the role of the interplay between Auger and Shockley-Read-Hall generation processes.

IntroductionThe use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for assessing and treating cognitive and motor disorders is promoting home-based telerehabilitation. This approach involves ongoing monitoring within a motivating context to help patients generalize their skills. It can also reduce healthcare costs and geographic barriers by minimizing hospitalization. This systematic review focuses on investigating key aspects of telerehabilitation protocols for children with neurodevelopmental or neurological disorders, including technology used, outcomes, caregiver involvement, and dosage, to guide clinical practice and future research.MethodThis systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The PICO framework was followed to define the search strategy for technology-based telerehabilitation interventions targeting the pediatric population (aged 0–18) with neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders. The search encompassed Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Independent reviewers were responsible for selecting relevant papers and extracting data, while data harmonization and analysis were conducted centrally.ResultsA heterogeneous and evolving situation emerged from our data. Our findings reported that most of the technologies adopted for telerehabilitation are commercial devices; however, research prototypes and clinical software were also employed with a high potential for personalization and treatment efficacy. The efficacy of these protocols on health or health-related domains was also explored by categorizing the outcome measures according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Most studies targeted motor and neuropsychological functions, while only a minority of papers explored language or multi-domain protocols. Finally, although caregivers were rarely the direct target of intervention, their role was diffusely highlighted as a critical element of the home-based rehabilitation setting.DiscussionThis systematic review offers insights into the integration of technological devices into telerehabilitation programs for pediatric neurologic and neurodevelopmental disorders. It highlights factors contributing to the effectiveness of these interventions and suggests the need for further development, particularly in creating dynamic and multi-domain rehabilitation protocols. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of promoting home-based and family-centered care, which could involve caregivers more actively in the treatment, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes for children with neurological or neurodevelopmental conditions.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO (CRD42020210663).

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains incurable and its ability to acquire resistance to front-line therapeutics has proved challenging. Bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins, particularly bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), are integral to gene expression in CLL and offer a promising therapeutic target. In this study, we examined the activity of the BRD4 inhibitor OPN-51107 alone and in combination with the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, in CLL cell lines and patient-derived CLL samples. We demonstrate that OPN-51107 induces anti-tumor activity in both CLL cell lines and patient-derived samples, including relapsed/refractory (R/R) samples and those with high-risk features (i.e. ATM and/or TP53 deletions). Importantly, the combination of OPN-51107 and venetoclax exhibited synergistic cytotoxicity in ibrutinib-resistant CLL cells and patient-derived CLL samples regardless of R/R or deletion status. This study establishes the preclinical efficacy of using OPN-51107 and venetoclax in combination in therapy-resistant and/or high-risk CLL, lending support for its further development as a combination therapy.

The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R-len) stands as an established treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). However, the reproducibility of clinical trial results in routine clinical practice is unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, we reviewed our experience with patients diagnosed with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) treated with this combination. Eighty-four patients underwent treatment with R-len, 69 (82%) affected by FL and 15 (18%) by MZL. The median age at the time of treatment initiation was 65 years (range, 39-94), 38 patients (45%) had a pre-treatment FLIPI score of 3-5, 19 (23%) had a bulky disease, 29 (37%) had a lymphoma refractory to the last treatment line, while in 20 (24%) cases the disease was refractory to rituximab. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 82%, and 52% achieved a complete response (CR). The best CR rates for FL and MZL patients were 55% and 40%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 22 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 22 months (95% CI 19-36) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 83% (95% CI 74-93). The median duration of CR (DoCR) was 46 months (95% CI 22-NR). Factors associated with shorter PFS in multivariate analysis were bulky disease and rituximab refractoriness. The most common adverse events (AE) included hematologic toxicity, fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea and constipation. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common severe toxicities (grade ≥3 in 25% and 4%, respectively). No new safety signals were reported. Real-life results of R-len in patients with R/R iNHL appear consistent with those reported in prospective studies, and further support its use as comparator arm in controlled clinical trials.

Despite continuous improvements in the management and treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), approximately 35% of affected patients experience relapse or are refractory to frontline chemotherapy. For these patients, outcomes are far from satisfactory, and a real unmet need exists both to improve frontline treatment and to create better options for relapsed/refractory disease. Polatuzumab vedotin is an anti-CD79b antibody conjugated to the monomethyl auristatin E microtubule inhibitor. The molecule has recently been under the spotlight for the promising results of the frontline combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone in the phase III POLARIX study, demonstrating improved progression-free survival over standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone. Remarkable improvements in terms of complete response rate and overall survival have also been achieved with polatuzumab vedotin by combining the antibody with the standard rituximab and bendamustine regimen for relapsed/refractory patients. Based on the results of these studies, health authorities in several countries granted approval for polatuzumab vedotin to be used as treatment both for patients with previously untreated DLBCL and for those with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this review, we summarize the data of major studies recently concluded with polatuzumab vedotin, and we provide an overview of the ongoing combination trials for frontline and relapsed/refractory DLBCL, outlining reported toxicities.

Osseous involvement by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL-bone) is a heterogeneous disease. There is limited data regarding response assessment by positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose, which may demonstrate residual avidity despite a complete response. We analyzed clinical data of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and identified all cases with DLBCL-bone. End of treatment scans were reviewed by two independent experts classifying osseous lesions into Deauville (DV) ≤3; DV ≥4, or reactive uptake in the bone marrow (M), site of fracture (F) or surgery (S). We compared outcomes of DLBCL-bone to other extranodal sites (EN) matched on International Prognotic Index features and regimen. Of 1,860 patients with DLBCL (bone 16%; EN 45%; nodal 39%), 41% had localized disease and 59% advanced. Only 9% (n=27) of patients with initial bone involvement had residual fluorodeoxyglucose avidity at the osseous site. In half of these cases, the uptake was attributed to F/S/M, and of the remaining 13, only two were truly refractory (both with persistent disease at other sites). Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were found to be similar for early- stage nodal DLBCL and DLBCL-bone, but inferior in EN-DLBCL. Advanced-stage disease involving the bone had a similar 5-year PFS to nodal disease and EN-DLBCL. After matching for International Prognotic Index and treatment regiments, PFS between bone and other EN sites was similar. Osseous involvement in DLBCL does not portend a worse prognosis. End of treatment DV ≥4 can be expected in 5-10% of cases, but in the absence of other signs of refractory disease, may be followed expectantly.

Tenalisib, a selective phosphoinositide-3-kinase δ/γ, and salt-inducible-kinase-3 inhibitor has shown efficacy and was well-tolerated in patients with T-cell lymphoma (TCL). In vitro studies suggest a synergistic anti-tumor potential for the combination of tenalisib with the histone-deacetylase inhibitor, romidepsin. This multicenter, open-label, phase I/II study was designed to characterize the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of oral tenalisib twice-daily and intravenous romidepsin administered on days 1, 8 and 15 in 28-day cycles in adults with relapsed/refractory TCL. Phase I/dose escalation determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/optimal doses of tenalisib and romidepsin. The phase II/dose expansion assessed the safety and anti-tumor activity of the combination at MTD/optimal dose. Overall, 33 patients were enrolled. In dose escalation, no dose-limiting toxicity was identified. Hence, the recommended doses for dose expansion were tenalisib 800 mg twice daily orally, and romidepsin 14 mg/m2 intravenous. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade reported in >15% of patients were nausea, thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, decreased appetite, neutropenia, vomiting, fatigue, anemia, dysgeusia, weight loss, diarrhea, and hypokalemia. Twenty-three patients (69.7%) had related grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events. The overall objective response rate in evaluable patients was 63.0% (peripheral TCL: 75% and cutaneous TCL: 53.3%), with a complete response and partial response of 25.9% and 37.0% respectively. The median duration of response was 5.03 months. Co-administration of tenalisib and romidepsin did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of romidepsin. Overall, tenalisib and romidepsin combination demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile supporting its further development for relapsed/refractory TCL (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03770000).